Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 90, Issue 2, pp 195–209 | Cite as

Public Policies and Suicide Rates in the American States

  • Patrick Flavin
  • Benjamin Radcliff
Article

Abstract

We are interested in the relationship between public policies and outcomes measuring quality of life. There is no outcome more final than the ending of one’s own life. Accordingly, we test the relationship between public policy regimes and suicide rates in the American states. Controlling for other relevant factors (most notably a state’s stock of social capital), we find that states with higher per capita public assistance expenditures tend to have lower suicide rates. This relationship is of significant magnitude when translated into potential lives saved each year. We also find that general state policy liberalism and the governing ideologies of state governments are linked to suicide rates. In response to a growing literature on the importance of non-political factors such as social connectedness in determining quality of life, these findings demonstrate that government policies remain important determinates as well.

Keywords

Public policy Social capital Suicide American state politics Welfare spending 

References

  1. Atkinson, A. (1999). The economic consequences of rolling back the welfare state. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Berry, W. D., Ringquist, E. J., Fording, R. C., & Hanson, R. L. (1998). Measuring citizen and government ideology in the American States, 1960–93. American Journal of Political Science, 42(1), 327–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Breault, K. D. (1986). Suicide in America: A test of Durkheim’s theory of religious and family integration, 1933–1980. American Journal of Sociology, 92(3), 628–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brenner, M. H. (1977). Personal stability and economic security. Social Policy, 9, 2–14.Google Scholar
  5. Buckingham, A. (2000). Welfare reform in Britain, Australia, the United States. In P. Saunders (Ed.), Reforming the Australian welfare state. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.Google Scholar
  6. Cavanagh, J. T., Carson, A. J., Sharpe, M., & Lawrie, S. M. (2003). Psychological autopsy studies of suicide: A systematic review. Psychological Medicine, 33(3), 395–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement: Organizations and Institutions: Sociological and Economic Approaches to the Analysis of Social Structure), S95–S120.Google Scholar
  8. Durkheim, E. (1897 (1951)). Suicide: A study in sociology. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  9. Erikson, R. S., Wright, G. C., & McIver, J. P. (1993). Statehouse democracy: Public opinion and policy in the American states. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Fiala, R., & LaFree, G. (1988). Cross-national determinants of child homicide. American Sociological Review, 53(3), 432–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garland, A. F., & Zigler, E. (1993). Adolescent suicide prevention. Current research and social policy implications. American Psychologist, 48(2), 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gartner, R. (1991). Family structure, welfare spending, and child homicide in developed democracies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53(1), 231–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gray, V., Lowery, D., Fellowes, M., & McAtee, A. (2004). Public opinion, public policy, and organized interests in the American states. Political Research Quarterly, 57(3), 411–420.Google Scholar
  15. Grollman, E. A. (1988). Suicide: Prevention, intervention, postvention. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  16. Helliwell, J. F. (2007). Well-being and social capital: Does suicide pose a puzzle? Social Indicators Research, 81(3), 455–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hirschman, A. O. (Ed.). (1992). Rival views of market society and other recent essays. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kenworthy, L. (1999). Do social-welfare policies reduce poverty? A cross-national assessment. Social Forces, 77(3), 1119–1139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lane, R. (1978). Autonomy, felicity, futility: The effects of the market economy on political personality. Journal of Politics, 40(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lewis, G., & Sloggett, A. (1998). Suicide, deprivation and unemployment: A record-linkage study. British Medical Journal, 317(7168), 1283–1286.Google Scholar
  21. Lindblom, C. (1977). Politics and markets: The world’s political-economic systems. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  22. Lobao, L., & Hooks, G. (2003). Public employment, welfare transfers, and economic well-being across local populations: Does a lean and mean government benefit the masses? Social Forces, 82(2), 519–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McIntosh, J. L. (2007). U.S.A. SUICIDE: State and regional data, 1990–1999 and 2000. Accessed online at http://mypage.iusb.edu/~jmcintos/SuicideStates.html. Accessed 13 Feb 2007.
  24. Merton, R. K. (1964). Anomie, anomia, and social interaction: Contexts of deviant behavior. In M. Clinard (Ed.), Anomie and deviant behavior. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  25. Messner, S. F., & Rosenfield, R. (1997). Political restraint of the market and levels of criminal homicide: A cross-national application of institutional-anomie theory. Social Forces, 75(4), 1393–1416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miller, H. L., Coombs, D. W., Leeper, J. D., & Barton, S. N. (1984). An analysis of the effects of suicide prevention facilities on suicide rates in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 74(4), 340–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Muntaner, C., & Lynch, J. (1999). Income inequality, social cohesion, and class relations: A critique of Wilkinson’s Neo-Durkheimian research program. International Journal of Health Services, 29(1), 59–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pescosolido, B. A., & Georgianna, S. (1989). Durkheim, suicide, and religion: Toward a network theory of suicide. American Sociological Review, 54(1), 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and survival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  31. Radcliff, B. (2001). Politics, markets, and life satisfaction: The political economy of human happiness. American Political Science Review, 95(4), 939–952.Google Scholar
  32. Sharkansky, I. (1969). The utility of Elazar’s political culture: A research note. Polity, 2(1), 66–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zimmerman, S. L. (2002). States’ spending for public welfare and their suicide rates, 1960 to 1995: What is the problem? Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 190(6), 349–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of Notre DameNotre DameUSA

Personalised recommendations