Three Ways to Be Happy: Pleasure, Engagement, and Meaning—Findings from Australian and US Samples
- 1.8k Downloads
This study examined the contributions of orientations to happiness (pleasure, engagement and meaning) to subjective well-being. A sample of 12,622 adults from the United States completed on-line surveys measuring orientations to happiness, positive affect, negative affect, and life satisfaction. A sample of 332 adults from Australia also completed these surveys as well as a measure of the big five factor personality traits. Hierarchical regressions generally supported the hypothesis that the three orientations to happiness predict subjective well-being (satisfaction with life, positive affect and negative affect) beyond sociodemographic variables and personality. Meaning and engagement explained the greatest variance in all three components of subjective well-being. Overall, these findings support the importance of a eudaimonic approach in addition to the hedonic approach to achieving happiness. Moreover, findings were relatively consistent in both the Australian and US samples.
KeywordsOrientations to happiness Subjective well-being Life satisfaction Positive and negative affect Positive psychology Pleasure Engagement Meaning
Thanks to Dr Vella-Brodrick’s 2006 PSY3062 happiness research students for assistance with the Australian data collection.
- Bryant, F. B., & Veroff, J. (2007). Savoring: A new model of positive experience. Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Chamberlain, K. (1988). On the structure of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 20, 581–604.Google Scholar
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper-Collins.Google Scholar
- Csikszentmihalyi, M., Abuhamdeh, S., & Nakamura, J. (Eds.). (2005). Flow. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
- Debats, D. L., Van der Lubbe, P. M., & Wezeman, F. R. (1993). On the psychometric properties of the Life Regard Index (LRI): A measure of meaningful life: An evaluation in three independent samples based on the Dutch version. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 337–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Diener, E., & Lucas, E. (1999). Personality and subjective well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.). Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 213–229). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
- Frankl, V. E. (1963). Man’s search for meaning, an introduction to logotherapy. Oxford, England: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar
- Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
- Mackay, H. (2004). Right and wrong: How to decide for yourself. Sydney, NSW: Hodder.Google Scholar
- Zika, S., & Chamberlain, K. (1992). On the relation between meaning in life and psychological well-being. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 133–145.Google Scholar