Social Indicators Research

, Volume 89, Issue 3, pp 557–564 | Cite as

Normative Life Satisfaction in Chinese Societies

  • Zhenghui Chen
  • Gareth DaveyEmail author


Research over several decades about subjective life satisfaction has led to the conclusion that the majority of people seem to be satisfied with their lives when their social and physical needs are met. In empirical studies which have used self-report instruments, this trend is reflected in respondents’ consistent preference for the positive end of scales. This led to the suggestion that there is a normative range for life satisfaction, which should hold true for general population data and, therefore, serve as a reference point, or a gold standard, for comparison (Cummins Social Indicators Research, 35, 179–200, 1995, Social Indicators Research, 43, 307–334, 1998). Subsequent research has shown that Western and non-Western samples generally conform to the normative range, but more data are needed from Chinese societies. In an attempt to remedy this situation, this paper investigates normative life satisfaction there. This paper reanalyses published and unpublished data from various Chinese societies (People’s Republic of China, Hong Kong, Macau, Singapore, and Taiwan) in order to confirm whether or not they lie within the normative range for non-Western countries. The results provide support for the relevance of Cummins’s normative range in Chinese societies. That the normative range generalised to the present study is a very useful finding, as it supports its utility for Chinese samples, and adds support to a theoretical explanation – i.e. the Wellbeing Homeostatisis theory—in Chinese groups.


China Life satisfaction Normative range 


  1. Biswas-Diener, R., Vittersø, J., & Diener, E. (2005). Most people are pretty happy, but there is cultural variation: The Inughuit, the Amish, and the Maasai. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 205–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boucher, J., & Osgood, C. (1969). The Pollyanna hypothesis. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 8, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chan, Y., & Lee, R. (2006). Network size, social support and happiness in later life: A comparative study of Beijing and Hong Kong. Journal of Happiness Studies 7(1), 87–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheung, C.-K., & Leung, K.-K. (2004). Forming life satisfaction among different social groups during the modernization of China. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5, 23–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheung, C., & Leung, K. (in press). Ways by which comparable income affects life satisfaction in Hong Kong. Social Indicators Research.Google Scholar
  6. Cummins, R. (1995). On the trail of the gold standard for subjective wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 35, 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cummins, R. (1998). A second approximation to an international standard for life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 43, 307–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cummins, R. (2003). Normative life satisfaction: measurement issues and a homeostatic model. Social Indicators Research, 64, 225–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cummins, R. A., & Nistico, H. (2002). Maintaining life satisfaction: The role of positive cognitive bias. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 37–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2000). New directions in subjective well-being research: The cutting edge. Indian Journal of Clinical Psychology, 27, 21–33.Google Scholar
  11. Diener, E., & Diener, C. (1996). Most people are happy. Psychological Science, 7, 181–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (Eds.) (2000). Culture and subjective well-being. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Diener, E., Emmons, R., Larson, R., & Griffith, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gill, W. (1984). Monitoring the subjective well-being of chronically ill patients over time. Community Health Studies, 8, 288–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goldings, H. (1954). On the avowal and projection of happiness. Journal of Personality, 23, 30–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huang, L., & Xing, Z. (2005). An initial research on the wellbeing index applied to citizens in China. Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical Science, l14(5), 464–465.Google Scholar
  17. Ibrahim, M, & Chung, M. (2003). Quality of life of residents living near industrial estates in Singapore. Social Indicators Research, 61(2), 203–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. International Wellbeing Group. (2006). Personal wellbeing index. Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University.Google Scholar
  19. Keng, K. A., & Hooi, W. S. (1995) Assessing quality of life in Singapore: An explaratory study. Social Indicators Research, 35(1), 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lau, A., Cummins, R., & McPherson, W. (2005). An investigation into the cross-cultural equivalence of the Personal Wellbeing Index. Social Indicators Research, 75, 403–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Le, Z., & Dou, Z. (2006). Wellbeing index study in Shenzhen, China. Shenzhen: Shenzhen Academy of Social Sciences.Google Scholar
  22. Lu, L. (2001). Understanding happiness: A look into the Chinese folk psychology. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2, 407–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lu, L., & Gilmour, R. (2004). Culture and conceptions of happiness: Individual oriented and social oriented SWB. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5, 269–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Macau Inter-University Institute (2007). Macau quality of life report 1. Macau: Macau Inter-University Institute.Google Scholar
  25. Swinyard, W., Kau A.-K., & Phua H.-Y. (2001). Happiness, materialism, and religious experience in the US and Singapore. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2(1), 13–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tiliouine, H., Cummins, R., & Davern, M. (2006). Measuring wellbeing in developing countries: The case of Algeria. Social Indicators Research, 75, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. World Values Survey. (1990, 1994, 1995, 2001). Retrieved from
  28. Zheng, X., Sang, D., & Wang, L. (2004). Acculturation and subjective well-being of Chinese students in Australia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5, 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentBeijing Normal UniversityZhuhaiChina
  2. 2.Psychology DepartmentUniversity of ChesterChesterUK

Personalised recommendations