Burnout and Wellbeing: Testing the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory in New Zealand Teachers
The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) is a public domain questionnaire measuring the degree of physical and psychological fatigue experienced in three sub-dimensions of burnout: personal, work-related, and client-related burnout. This study first examines the reliability and validity of the CBI in measuring burnout in New Zealand secondary school teachers, and then the relationship between burnout and wellbeing among this population. The CBI had acceptable reliability (internal consistency and homogeneity) as well as factorial and criterion-related validity. As expected, burnout was negatively related to wellbeing measures (wellbeing index, school connection, and perceived general health). The findings indicate that this burnout questionnaire is a valid instrument to use with New Zealand secondary teachers, and also highlight the potential impact of burnout on the health and wellbeing of teachers.
KeywordsBurnout Wellbeing Copenhagen Burnout Inventory Secondary school teachers New Zealand Validity Reliability
- Bauer, J., Unterbrink, T., Hack, A., Pfeifer, R., Buhl-Grießhaber, V., Müller, U., Wesche, H., Frommhold, M., Seibt, R., Scheuch, K., & Wirsching, M. (2007). Working conditions, adverse events and mental health problems in a sample of 949 German teachers. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 80, 442–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Biggs, A., & Brough, P. (2006). A test of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory and psychological engagement. Australian Journal of Psychology, 58(Suppl.), 114.Google Scholar
- Carmines, E. G., & McIver, J. D. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables: Analysis of covariance structures. In G. W. Bohinstedt & E. F. Borgatta (Eds.), Social measurement: Current issues (pp. 65–115). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
- Cinamon, R. G., Rich, Y., & Westman, M. (2007). Teachers’ occupation-specific work-family conflict. Career Development Quarterly, 55, 249–261.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the bahavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Jöreskog, K. G. (1999). How large can a standardized coefficient be? from http://www.ssicentral.com/lisrel/techdocs/HowLargeCanaStandardizedCoefficientbe.pdf. Retrieved May 17, 2006.
- Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). PRELIS 2: User’s reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
- Levesque, M., Blais, M. R., & Hess, U. (2004). Dynamique motivationnelle de l’épuisement et du bien-être chez des enseignants africains [Motivational dynamic of burnout and well-being in African teachers]. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science Revue canadienne des Sciences du comportement, 36, 190–201.Google Scholar
- Maslach, C. (1976). Burned-out. Human Behavior, 5, 16–22.Google Scholar
- Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1986). Maslach Burnout Inventory manual (2nd ed.). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
- Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Odagiri, Y., Shimomitsu, T., Ohya, Y., & Kristensen, T. S. (2004). Overcommitment and high effort are strongly associated with burnout among Japanese nurses. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 11(Suppl.), 214.Google Scholar
- Timms, C., Graham, D., & Caltabiano, M. (2006). Gender implications of perceptions of trustworthiness of school administration and teacher burnout/job stress. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 41, 343–358.Google Scholar
- Watson, P., Clark, T., Denny, S. et al. (2003). A health profile of New Zealand youth who attend secondary school. New Zealand Medical Journal, 116. from http://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/116-1171/380/ Retrieved May 17, 2006.
- WHO Regional Office for Europe (1998). Wellbeing measures in primary health care/The Depcare Project (Report on a WHO Meeting, Stockholm, Sweden). Copenhagen: WHO.Google Scholar