The Best and Worst Times of Life: Narratives and Assessments of Subjective Well-Being by Anamnestic Comparative Self Assessment (ACSA) in the Eastern Cape, South Africa
- 149 Downloads
The Anamnestic Comparative Self Assessment (ACSA) measure of subjective well-being (SWB) aims to reduce the problems of cultural bias and relativity to external standards by allowing people to define the endpoints or ‘anchors’ of the measurement scale. In medical terminology anamnestic denotes ‘based on memory’. The ACSA uses subjects’ memories of the best and worst periods in their lives to define the anchors of the scale. They then assess their current quality of life relative to these personal anchors. The South African pilot study tested the match between self-assessment of SWB with ACSA and the conventional single-item measures of life satisfaction and happiness used in the South African Quality of Life Trends Study and analysed the narratives of the best and worst times of life. The quota sample of 46 consisted of 26 residents of Makana district in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa, and 20 patients undergoing treatment in the local TB hospital. Mean SWB ratings with all three measures of life satisfaction, happiness and ACSA were between 5 and 6 on a 0–10-point scale. Ratings on all three scales were positively correlated. However, on ACSA the TB patients rated their current SWB 1.84 points lower than the community respondents, suggesting a greater sensitivity of this measure. It was observed that the starting points of the life stories produced by respondents to define the anchor periods for ACSA were related to their current assessment of SWB. A typology was developed that combined the starting point of the life stories with current SWB. The majority of community respondents matched the ‘Achiever’ type who scored positively on ACSA (i.e., above the mid-point of the scale) and whose life stories started with the worst period of their lives and proceeded to the best period. The TB patients were the only respondents to represent the ‘Survivor’ type whose morale had recovered after misfortune in life. ‘Survivors’ started their narratives with the best period in their lives, then moved to the worst (often health-related) one, and gave positive ACSA ratings. Based on the qualitative analysis of narratives, it is concluded that ACSA is a sensitive measurement instrument and therefore particularly useful for monitoring the effects of treatments and social interventions in longitudinal studies. However, further research is required to verify its cross-cultural validity.
KeywordsAnamnestic Comparative Self Assessment (ACSA) Subjective well-being Happiness Life satisfaction Narratives Life review Anchor periods South Africa
The research reported here was financially supported by grant ZEIN2005ZVV48 from the Vlaamse Interuniversitaire Raad-Universitaire Ontwikkelingssamenwerking (VLIR-UOS). Views are those expressed by the authors and should not be attributed to the sponsors. The authors thank Nomtunsi Api and Zizo Siwendu for assistance with fieldwork and Professor Sarah Radloff for assistance with statistics. They gratefully acknowledge the hospitality of the SANTA Temba TB hospital in Grahamstown East/Rhini.
- Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
- Bernheim, J. L. (1983). ‘L’auto-évaluation anamnestique comparative (ACSA). 1. Description d’une méthode de mesure de la qualité subjective de la vie des malades cancéraux. Psychologie Médicale, 15, 1615–1617.Google Scholar
- Bemheim, J. L., & Buyse, M. (1984). The anamnestic comparative self-assessment for measuring the subjective quality of life of cancer patients. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 1, 25–38.Google Scholar
- Bernheim, J. L., Theuns, P., Mazaheri, M., Calcoen, P., Heylighen, F., & Rose, M. (2005). Bridging cultural relativity in quality of life by Anamnestic Comparative Self-Assessment (ACSA). In Proceedings Australian Quality of Life Conference. http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/conferences/abstracts_papers/2004/7.
- Booysen, F. le R., van Rensburg, H. C. J., Bachmann, M., Louwagie, G., & Fairall, L. (2007). The heart in HAART: Quality of life of patients enrolled in the public sector antiretroviral treatment programme in the Free State Province of South Africa. Social Indicators Research, 81(2), 283–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Cantril, H. (1965). The pattern of human concerns. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
- Cramm, J. (2006). Determinants of (non-)compliance with treatment for people with tuberculosis in the Eastern Cape: A Q-methodological study. Masters thesis, Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
- Diener, E., & Suh, E.M. (Eds.) (2000). Culture and subjective well-being. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Erstad, I. (2006). The resurgence of tuberculosis in South Africa: an investigation into socio-economic aspects of the disease in a context of structural violence in Grahamstown, Eastern Cape. Master of Arts thesis, Rhodes University, Grahamstown.Google Scholar
- Graham, C. (2006). Measuring quality of life in Latin America: Some insights from happiness economics and the latinobarometro. Paper presented at the 7th International Society for Quality of Life Studies conference, 17–20 July, Grahamstown, South Africa.Google Scholar
- Inglehart, R. (2004). World values survey. http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/news/index.html.
- Møller, V. (2007a). Researching quality of life In a developing country: Lessons from the South African case. In I. Gough & J.A. McGregor (Eds.), Wellbeing in developing countries: From theory to research (pp. 242–258). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Møller, V. (2007c). South Africa coming to terms with difference. In P. Molt & H. Dickow (Eds.), Comparing cultures and conflicts, festschrift for Theodor Hanf (pp. 461–475). Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
- Møller, V., & Ferreira, M. (1992). Successful ageing in South Africa: Opportunity structures and subjective well-being. Southern African Journal of Gerontology, 1(1), 5–8.Google Scholar
- Neugarten, B. L., Havighurst, R. J., & Tobin, S. S. (1961). The measurement of life satisfaction. Journal of Gerontology, 16, 134–143.Google Scholar
- Staudinger, U. M. (2001). ‘Life reflection: A socialcognitive analysis of life review’. Review of General Psychology, 5, 148–160.Google Scholar
- Veenhoven, R. (2006). International scale interval study: improving the comparability of responses to survey questions about happiness. Paper presented at the 7th International Society for Quality of Life Studies conference, 17–20 July, Grahamstown, South Africa.Google Scholar