Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 86, Issue 3, pp 355–380 | Cite as

The Quality of the Urban Environment Around Public Housing Buildings in Montréal: An Objective Approach Based on GIS and Multivariate Statistical Analysis

  • Philippe Apparicio
  • Anne-Marie Séguin
  • Daniel Naud
Article

Abstract

The question of the “insertion” in space of public housing into the surrounding urban environment is not new. It has often been examined from the perspective of the social environment, but more rarely from that of the physical environment and the accessibility of public and private services and facilities. To qualify the immediate urban environment around Montréal’s public housing buildings in its complexity, we are proposing a methodological approach based on the use of several spatial databases in GIS: (1) the Montréal public housing database, (2) individual census data for the Montréal CMA, (3) a satellite image, (4) a land use map, and (5) location data on a series of public and private services and facilities. Use of these spatial data enables us to identify various combinations of advantages and disadvantages within the urban living environment in which Montréal’s public housing buildings have been located, according to three dimensions: the social environment, the physical environment, and the accessibility of services and facilities. Our final results show that only a small proportion of public housing tenants (7%) live in residual spaces, that is, in quite unattractive areas of the city which combine a number of urban disadvantages: a degraded physical environment, a high level of social deprivation, and few or no services and facilities.

Keywords

Urban quality of life Geographical information systems Spatial analysis Public housing Montréal Built environment 

References

  1. Andrews, F. M. (1974). Social indicators of perceived life quality. Social Indicators Research, 1(3), 279–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews, F. M., & Inglehart, R. F. (1979). The structure of subjective well-being in nine western societies. Social Indicators Research, 6(11), 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1974). Developing measures of perceived life quality: Results from several national surveys. Social Indicators Research, 1(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Apparicio, P., Cloutier, M. S., & Shearmur, R. (2007). The case of Montreal’s missing food deserts: Evaluation of accessibility to food supermarkets. International Journal of Health Geographics, 6(1), 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Apparicio, P., & Séguin, A. M. (2006a). L’insertion des HLM montréalaises dans le milieu social environnant. L’espace géographique, 36(1), 63–85.Google Scholar
  6. Apparicio, P., & Séguin, A. M. (2006b). Measuring the accessibility of services and facilities for residents of public housing in Montreal. Urban Studies, 43(1), 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Apparicio, P., & Séguin, A. M. (2006c). L’accessibilité aux services et aux équipements: Un enjeu d’équité pour les personnes âgées résidant en HLM à Montréal. Cahiers de géographie du Québec, 50(139), 23–44.Google Scholar
  8. Aureli, E., & Baldazzi, B. (1998). Households and territory. The location of the population of Rome in relation to housing supply characteristics. Social Indicators Research, 44(1), 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baldazzi, B., Corrado, H. C., & Ferruzza, A. (1998). The quality of life in some local metropolitan labour markets in Italy. Social Indicators Research, 44(1), 71–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Balfour, J., & Kaplan, G. A. (2002). Neighborhood environment and loss of physical function in older adults: Evidence from the Alameda county study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 155(6), 507–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blumenfeld, H. (1969). Criteria for judging the quality of the urban environment. In H. J. Schmandt, & W. Bloomberg (Eds.), The Quality of Urban Life (Urban Affairs Annual Review, Vol. 3), pp. 137–164.Google Scholar
  12. Bonnes, M., Bonaiuto, M., & Ercolani, A. P. (1991). Crowding and residential satisfaction in the urban-environment—a contextual approach. Environment and Behavior, 23(5), 531–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buck, N. (2001). Identifying neighbourhood effects on social exclusion. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2251–2275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bunge, M. (1975). What is a quality of life indicator? Social Indicators Research, 2(1), 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cicerchia, A. (1996). Indicators for the measurement of the quality of urban life—What is the appropriate territorial dimension? Social Indicators Research, 39(3), 321–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. City of Edmonton (2004). Community Indicators (Quality of Life Measures) (2nd ed.). Edmonton: Community Services.Google Scholar
  17. Communauté urbaine de Montréal (2001) Carte d’occupation du sol (édition 2000)—document d’accompagnement (Communauté urbaine de Montréal, Division de l’aménagement, Service de la mise en valeur du territoire, Montréal).Google Scholar
  18. Cook, C. C. (1988). Components of neighborhood satisfaction: Responses from urban and suburban single-parent women. Environment and Behavior, 20(2), 115–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cummins, R. A. (1999). A psychometric evaluation of the comprehensive quality of life scale—Fifth Edition. In L. L. Yuan, B. Yuen, & C. Low (Eds.), Urban Quality of Life: Critical Issues and Options (pp. 13–31). School of Building and Real Estate, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
  20. Cutter, S. L. (1985). Rating places: A geographer’s view on quality of life. Washington DC: Association of Geographers Resource Publications in Geography.Google Scholar
  21. De Hollander, A. E. M., & Staatsen, B. A. M. (2003). Health, environment and quality of life: An epidemiological perspective on urban development. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65(1), 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Detwyler, T. R., & Marcus, M. G. (1972). Urbanization and environment: The physical geography of the city. Belmont: Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
  23. Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40(1–2), 189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dubin, R. A., & Sung, C. (1990). Specification of hedonic regressions: Non-nested tests on measures of neighborhood quality. Journal of Urban Economics, 27(1), 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Edwards, J., Walters, S., & Griffiths, R. K. (1994). Hospital admissions for asthma in preschool children: Relationship to major roads in Birmingham, United Kingdom. Archives of Environmental Health, 49(4), 223–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ellen, I. G., & Turner, M. A. (1997). Does neighborhood matter? Assessing recent evidence. Housing Policy Debate, 8(4), 833–866.Google Scholar
  27. Findlay, A., Morris, A., & Rogerson, R. (1988). Where to live in Britain in 1988: Quality of life in British cities. Cities, 5(3), 268–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fotheringham, A. S., & Wong, D. W. S. (1991). The modifiable areal unit problem in multivariate statistical analysis. Environment and Planning A, 23(7), 1025–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Frick, D., & Hoefert, H.-W. (1986). The quality of urban life. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  30. Gehrmann, F. (1978). Valid empirical measurement of the quality of life indicator? Social Indicators Research, 5(1), 73–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gillingham, R., & Reece, W. S. (1978). Analytical problems in the measurement of the quality of life indicator. Social Indicators Research, 7(1), 91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Houston, D., Wu, J., Ong, P., & Winer, A. (2004). Structural disparities of urban traffic in Southern California: Implications for vehicle-related air pollution exposure in minority and high-poverty neighborhoods. Journal of Urban Affairs, 26(5), 565–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jacob, S. G., & Willits, F. K. (1994). Objective and subjective indicators of community evaluation: A Pennsylvania assessment. Social Indicators Research, 32(2), 161–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jelinski, D. E. (1996). The modifiable areal unit problem and implications for landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology, 11(3), 129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kazemipur, A., & Halli, S. S. (1997). Plight of immigrants: The spatial concentration of poverty in Canada. Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 20(1–2), 217–238.Google Scholar
  36. Kazemipur, A., & Halli, S. S. (2001). The changing colour of poverty in Canada. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 38(2), 216–238.Google Scholar
  37. Kennedy, L. W., Northcott, H. C., & Kinzel, C. (1978). Subjective evaluation of well-being: Problems and prospects. Social Indicators Research, 5(1–4), 457–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kuo, F. E. (2001). Coping with poverty. Impacts of environment and attention in the inner city. Environment and Behavior, 33(1), 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kuz, T. J. (1978). Quality of life, an objective and subjective variable analysis. Regional Studies, 12(4), 409–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lake, I. R., Lovett, A. A., Bateman, I. J., & Langford, I. H. (1998). Modelling environmental influences on property prices in an urban environment. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 22(2), 121–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ley, D., & Smith, H. (1997). Immigration and poverty in Canadian cities, 1971–1991. Journal of Regional Science, 20(1–2), 29–48.Google Scholar
  42. Lo, C. P. (1997). Application of Landsat TM data for quality of life assessment in an urban environment. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 21(3–4), 259–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Loo, C. (1986). Neighborhood satisfaction and safety. Environment and Behaviour, 18(1), 109–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mackrous, R. (2000). De la priorité aux gens du quartier à l’universalité d’accès, Paper presented at the colloquium ‘L’insertion des immigrants dans le logement social à l’heure de la réorganisation municipale: Problématiques et enjeux’ (Centre de recherche interuniversitaire de Montréal sur l’immigration, l’intégration et la dynamique urbaine, Montréal), pp. 48–60.Google Scholar
  45. Mather, P. M. (2004). Computer processing of remotely-sensed images: An introduction. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  46. McCrea, R., Stimson, R., & Western, J. (2005). Testing a moderated model of satisfaction with urban living using data for Brisbane-south east Queensland, Australia. Social Indicators Research, 72(2), 121–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nicolai, T., Carr, D., Duhme, H., Von Ehrenstein, O., Wagner, C., & Von Mutius, E. (2003). Urban traffic and pollutant exposure related to respiratory outcomes and atopy in a large sample of children. European Respiratory Journal, 21(6), 956–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Northridge, M. E., Sclar, E. D., & Biswas, P. (2003). Sorting out the connections between the built environment and health: A conceptual framework for navigating pathways and planning healthy cities. European Respiratory Journal, 80(4), 556–568.Google Scholar
  49. OCDE (1978). Indicateurs d’environnement urbain. Paris: Organisation de coopération et de développement économiques.Google Scholar
  50. Office municipal d’habitation de Montréal, 2000. Une équipe à l’écoute. Rapport annuel 2000. Montréal: OMHM.Google Scholar
  51. Olfert, S. (2003). Quality of leisure indicators. Saskatoon: Community—University Institute for Social Research, Saskatchewan University.Google Scholar
  52. Omuta, G. E. D. (1988). The quality of urban life and the perception of livability: A case study of neighbourhoods in Benin City, Nigeria. Social Indicators Research, 20(4), 417–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Openshaw, S. (1983). The modifiable areal unit problem. Norwich: GeoBooks, Concepts and Techniques in Modern Geography.Google Scholar
  54. Orford, S. (1999). Valuing the built environment: GIS and house price analysis. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  55. Pacione, M. (1982a). Evaluating the quality of the residential environment in a deprived council estate (Clydeside, Scotland). Geoforum, 13(1), 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pacione, M. (1982b). The use of objective and subjective measures of life quality in human geography. Progress in Human Geography, 6, 495–514.Google Scholar
  57. Pacione, M. (1986). Quality of life in Glasgow: An applied geographical analysis. Environment and Planning A, 18(11), 1499–1520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pacione, M. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human wellbeing—A social geographical perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65(1–2), 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Picot, G., & Hou, F. (2003). The rise in low-income rates among immigrants in Canada. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
  60. Proshansky, H. M., & Fabian, K. F. (1986). Psychological aspects of the quality of urban life. In D. Frick, & H. W. Hoefert (Eds.), Quality of urban life. Social, psychological, and physical conditions (pp. 19–29). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  61. Rossi, R. J., & Gilmartin, K. J. (1980). The handbook of social indicators: Sources, characteristics, and analysis. New York: Garland STPM Press.Google Scholar
  62. Russ-Eft, D. (1979). Identifying components comprising neighborhood quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 6(4), 349–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schmandt, H. J., & Bloomberg, W. (1969). The quality of urban life. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  64. Schneider, M. (1975). The quality of life in large American cities: Objective and subjective social indicators. Social Indicators Research, 1(4), 495–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Séguin, A. M., & Divay, G. (2004). Lutte territorialisée à la pauvreté: examen critique du modèle de revitalisation urbaine intégrée. Lien social et politiques, 52(3), 67–79.Google Scholar
  66. Sénécal, G., Hamel, P. J., & Vachon, N. (2005). Forme urbaine, qualité de vie, environnements naturels et construits. Éléments de réflexion et test de mesure pour la région métropolitaine de Montréal. Cahiers de géographie du Québec, 49(136), 19–44.Google Scholar
  67. Sirgy, M. J., & Cornwell, T. (2002). How neighborhood features affect quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 59(1), 79–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sirgy, M. J., Rahtz, D. R., Cicic, M., & Underwood, R. (2000). A method for assessing residents’ satisfaction with community-based services: A quality-of-life perspective. Social Indicators Research, 49(3), 279–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Small, M. L., & Newman, K. (2001). Urban poverty after the truly disadvantaged: The rediscovery of the family, the neighborhood, and culture. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Smargiassi, A., Berrada, K., Fortier, I., & Kosatsky, T. (2005). Traffic intensity, dwelling value, and hospital admissions for respiratory disease among the elderly in Montreal (Canada): A case-control analysis. Journal of Epidemiology Community Health, 60(6), 507–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Smith, D. (1973). The geography of social well-being in the United States: An introduction to territorial social indicators. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  72. Statistics Canada (2003). 2001 Census Dictionary. Ottawa: Minister of Industry.Google Scholar
  73. Stimson, R. J., Western, J., Mullins, P., & Simpson, R. (2000). Urban metabolism as a framework for investigating quality of life and sustainable development in the Brisbane-Southeast Queensland metro region. In L. L. Yuan, B. Yuen, & C. Low (Eds.), Urban quality of life. Critical Issues and Options (pp. 143–168). School of Building and Real Estate, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
  74. Sun, Y. (2005). Development of neighbourhood quality of life indicators. Saskatoon: Community—University Institute for Social Research, Saskatchewan University.Google Scholar
  75. Talen, E. (1998). Visualizing fairness. Equity maps for planners. Journal of American Planning Association, 64(1), 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ülengin, B., Ülengin, F., & Güvenç, Ü. (2002). Living environment preferences of the inhabitants of Istanbul: A modified hierarchical information integration model. Social Indicators Research, 57(1), 13–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ville de Montréal (2000). Répertoire des établissements et des emplois à Montréal. Ville de Montréal, CLD de Montréal, Emploi-Québec, Industrie et Commerce Québec, Développement économique Canada.Google Scholar
  78. Ward, J. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(301), 238–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wasserman, I. M., & Chua, L. A. (1980). Objective and subjective social indicators of the quality of life in American SMSA’s: A reanalysis. Social Indicators Research, 8(3), 365–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Weber, C., & Hirsch, J. (1992). Some urban measurements from SPOT data: Urban life quality indices. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 13(17), 3251–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wish, N. B. (1986). Are we really measuring the quality of life? Well-being has subjective dimensions, as well as objective ones. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 45(1), 93–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Witten, K., Exeter, D., & Field, A. (2003). The quality of urban environments: Mapping variation in access to community resources. Urban Studies, 40(1), 161–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philippe Apparicio
    • 1
  • Anne-Marie Séguin
    • 1
  • Daniel Naud
    • 1
  1. 1.Urbanisation, Culture et SociétéInstitut national de la recherche scientifiqueMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations