Social Indicators Research

, Volume 87, Issue 2, pp 329–346 | Cite as

The Response of Abortion Demand to Changes in Abortion Costs

Article

Abstract

This study uses pooled cross-section time-series data, over the years 1982, 1992 and 2000, to estimate the impact of various restrictive abortion laws on the demand for abortion. This study complements and extends prior research by explicitly including the price of obtaining an abortion in the estimation. The empirical results show that the real price of an abortion has a statistically and numerically significant negative impact on abortion demand. Over the period 1982–2000 approximately 20% of the decline in the incidence of abortion was due solely to the increase in the real price of obtaining an abortion. A state Medicaid funding restriction of abortion and a parental involvement law reduce the abortion demand, but a state waiting period and a mandatory counseling law have no statistically significant impact on the abortion demand. The empirical results also provide support for the hypothesis that increases in abortion costs not only reduce the number of abortions, but also reduce the number of pregnancies by altering women’s sexual/contraceptive practices.

Keywords

Abortion demand Abortion costs Restrictive abortion laws 

References

  1. Akerloff, George A., Yellen, Janet L., & Katz, Michael (1996). An analysis of out-of-wedlock childbearing in the United States. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111, 277–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alan Guttmacher Institute (2004). State policies in brief. New York: Alan Guttmacher Institute.Google Scholar
  3. Althaus, Frances A., & Henshaw, Stanley K. (1994). The effects of mandatory delay laws on abortion patients and providers. Family Planning Perspectives, 26, 228–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ammerman, Nancy T. (1987). Bible believers. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, Gary S. (1960). An economic analysis of fertility. In C. Christ (Ed.), Demographic and economic change in developed countries (pp. 209–231). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Blank, Rebecca M., George, Christine C., & London, Rebecca (1996). State abortion rates: The impact of policies, providers, politics, demographics, and economic environment. Journal of Health Economics, 15, 513–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen, Jeffrey E., & Barrilleaux, Charles (1993). Public opinion, interest groups, and public policy making: Abortion policy in the American states. In M. L. Goggin (Ed.), Understanding the new politics of abortion (pp. 190–202). Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Ellwood, David, & Bane, Mary Jo (1985). The Impact of AFDC on family structure and living arrangements. In Ronald G. Ehrenberg (Ed.), Research in labor economics. Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  9. Gohmann, Stephan, & Ohsfeldt, Robert L. (1993). Effects of price and availability on abortion demand. Contemporary Policy Issues, 11, 42–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goldscheider, Calvin, & Mosher, William D. (1991). Patterns of contraceptive use in the United States: The importance of religious factors. Studies in Family Planning, 22, 102–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haas-Wilson, Deborah (1996). The impact of state abortion restrictions on minors’ demand for abortions. Journal of Human Resources, 31, 140–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haas-Wilson, Deborah (1997). Women’s reproductive choices: The impact of medicaid funding restrictions. Family Planning Perspectives, 29, 228–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Halva-Neubauer, Glen (1990). Abortion policy in the post-Webster age. Publius, 20, 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harper, Cynthia C., Henderson, Jillian T., & Durney, Phillip D. (2005). Abortion in the United States. Annual Review of Public Health, 26, 501–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kane, Thomas J., & Staiger, Douglas (1996). Teen motherhood and abortion access. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111, 467–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Levine, Phillip B. (2003). Parental involvement laws and fertility behavior. Journal of Health Economics, 22, 861–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Levine, Phillip B. (2004). Sex and consequences: Abortion policy and the economics of fertility. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Levine, Phillip B., & Staiger, Douglas (2002). Abortion as insurance. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper.Google Scholar
  19. Levine, Phillip B., Trainor, Amy B., & Zimmerman, David J. (1996). The effects of medicaid abortion funding restrictions on abortions, pregnancies, and births. Journal of Health Economics, 15, 555–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Matthews, Stephen, Ribar, David, & Wilheim, Mark (1997). The effects of economic conditions and access to reproductive health services on state abortion rates and birthrates. Family Planning Perspectives, 29, 52–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Medoff, Marshall H. (1988). An economic analysis of the demand for abortions. Economic Inquiry, 26, 353–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Medoff, Marshall H. (1997). A pooled time-series analysis of abortion demand. Population Research and Policy Review, 16, 597–605 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Medoff, Marshall H. (2002). The determinants and impact of state abortion restrictions. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 61, 481–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Merz, Jon F., Jackson, Catherine A., & Klerman, Jacob A. (1995). A review of abortion policy: Legality, medicaid funding and parental involvement, 1967–1994. Women’s Rights Law Reporter, 17, 1–61.Google Scholar
  25. Michael, Robert T. (1973). Education and the derived demand for children. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 128–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moffitt, Robert (1994). Welfare effects on female headship with area effects. Journal of Human Resources, 29, 621–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. U.S. Bureau of the Census. Statistical abstract of the United States, 1982, 1992, 2002. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1983, 1993, 2003.Google Scholar
  28. U.S. Bureau of the Census, U.S. Census of the Population. State Reports, 1980, 1990, 2000. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1983, 1993, 2003.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsCalifornia State University, Long BeachLong BeachUSA

Personalised recommendations