Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 87, Issue 2, pp 189–210 | Cite as

Does Society Matter? Life Satisfaction in the Enlarged Europe

  • Petra BöhnkeEmail author
Article

Abstract

Life satisfaction is quite heterogeneously distributed across countries of the enlarged European Union. Previous research has shown how living conditions within individual countries, such as access to material and emotional resources, are important for personal well-being, but it has been less successful in explaining differences between countries. This article investigates whether it matters in which political and economic circumstances people live, as well as whether their particular perception of the quality of their societal environment plays a role. People are well aware that the institutional and cultural settings in which their lives are embedded create opportunities and limitations: within individual countries, perceptions of society influence life satisfaction outcomes irrespective of access to resources. However, their importance for well-being differs across Europe: perceptions of societies are highly decisive in countries that provide only a minimum of social security and in which the reliability of political institutions is poor. In rich and stable countries, the impact is weaker and private social support becomes more important. In addition to these country-specific weights of life satisfaction determinants, life satisfaction variations between countries can be explained to a large extent by taking into consideration the economic performance, the social security level, and the political culture in a country—all in all, general conditions that enable people to live a respectable life.

Keywords

Life satisfaction Quality of society Europe Multilevel analysis Social structure International comparison 

References

  1. Alber, J., Delhey J., Keck, W., & Nauenburg, R. (2004). Quality of life in Europe. First European quality of life survey 2003. European foundation for the improvement of living and working conditions. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications for the European Communities.Google Scholar
  2. Alber, J., Fahey, T., & Saraceno, C. (Eds.) (2007). Handbook of quality of life in enlargement Europe. London: Routledge (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  3. Allardt, E. (1976). Dimensions of welfare in a comparative scandinavian study. Acta Sociologica, 19(3), 227–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allardt, E. (1993). Having, loving, being: An alternative to the Swedish model of welfare research. In M. Nussbaum, & A. Sen (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 88–94). Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: Americans’ perceptions of life quality. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  6. Arendt, D. (2003). The quality of life survey. Fieldwork technical report. Hilversum: GfK INTOMART.Google Scholar
  7. Argyle, M. (1987). The psychology of happiness. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  8. Argyle, M. (1999). Causes and correlates of happiness. In D. Kahnemann, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 353–373). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Blanchflower, D. G., & Freeman, R. (1997). The attitudinal legacy of communist labor relations. Industrial Labor Relations Review, 50, 438–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2001). Unemployment, well-being and wage curves in eastern Europe. Journal of Japanese and International Economies, 15, 364–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Böhnke, P. (2005). First European quality of life survey: Life satisfaction, happiness and sense of belonging. European foundation for the improvement of living and working conditions. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  12. Böhnke, P., & Kohler, U. (2007). Well-being and inequality. In G. Therborn, & S. Immerfall (Eds.), Handbook of European Societies (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  13. Bonoli, G. (1997). Classifying welfare states: a two-dimensional approach. Journal of Social Policy, 26(3), 351–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life. Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  15. Clark, A. E. (2003). Unemployment as a social norm: Psychological evidence from panel data. Journal of Labor Economics, 21, 323–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clark, A. E., Georgellis, Y., Lucas, R. E., & Diener, E. (2004). Unemployment alters the set-point for life satisfaction. Psychological Science, 15(1), 8–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Delhey, J. (2004). Life satisfaction in the enlarged Europe. European foundation for the improvement of living and working conditions. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  18. Delhey, J., & Newton, K. (2003). Who trusts? The origins of social trust in seven countries. European Societies, 5(2), 93–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Delhey, J., & Newton, K. (2005). Predicting cross-national levels of social trust: Global pattern or nordic exceptionalism? European Sociological Review, 21(4), 311–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R. J., & Oswald, A. J. (2001). Preferences over inflation and unemployment: Evidence from surveys of happiness. The American Economic Review, 91(1), 335–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R. J., & Oswald, A. J. (2003). The macroeconomics of happiness. Review of Econonics and Statistics, 85(4), 809–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). Personality and subjective well-being. In D. Kahnemann, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundation of hedonic psychology (pp. 213–229). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  23. Diener, E., & Lucas R. (2000). Explaining differences in societal levels of happiness: Relative standards, need fulfillment, culture, and evaluation theory. Journal of Happiness Studies: An Interdisciplinary Periodical on Subjective Well-Being, 1, 41–78.Google Scholar
  24. Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40, 189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (1999). National differences in subjective well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 434–450). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  26. Diener, E., Suh, E., Lucas, R., & Smith, H. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Donovan, N., & Halpern, D. (2002). Life satisfaction: The state of knowledge and implications for government. Retrieved April 16, 2007 from UK Cabinet Office, Paper of the Prime Minister’s Strategy Unit Web site: http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/strategy/seminars/life_satisfaction/index.asp
  28. Easterlin, R. (1973). Does money buy happiness? The Public Interest, 30, 3–10.Google Scholar
  29. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  30. Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Estes, R. J. (1984). The social progress of nations. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  32. Fahey, T., & Smyth, E. (2004). Do subjective indicators measure welfare? Evidence from 33 European societies. European Societies, 6(1), 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ferrera, M. (1996). The “southern” model of welfare in social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 6(1), 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, economy and institutions. Economic Journal, 110(446), 918–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002a). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 402–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002b). Happiness and economics. How the economy and institutions affect well-being. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Glatzer, W., & Zapf, W. (Eds.) (1984). Lebensqualität in der Bundesrepublik. Objektive Lebensbedingungen und subjektives Wohlbefinden. Frankfurt/New York: Campus.Google Scholar
  38. Gundelach, P., & Kreiner, S. (2004). Happiness and life satisfaction in advanced European countries. Cross-cultural research, 38, 359–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hagerty, M. R., Vogel, J., & Møller, V. (2002). Assessing quality of life and living. Conditions to guide national policy. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  40. Haller, M., & Hadler, M. (2006). How social relations and structures can produce happiness and unhappiness: An international comparative analysis. Social Indicators Research, 75, 169–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hamer, D. H. (1996). The heritability of happiness. Nature Genetics, 14(2), 125–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Headey, B., & Wearing, A. (1992). Understanding happiness. A theory of subjective well-being. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.Google Scholar
  43. Helliwell, J. F. (2003). How’s life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being. Economic Modelling, 20, 331–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences. Comparing values, behaviours, institutions and organisations across nations. Thousand Oaks/London/New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  45. Inglehart, R. (2001). Sociological theories of modernisation. In N. J. Smelser, & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behaviorial sciences (pp. 9965–9971). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  46. Inglehart, R., & Klingemann, H.-D. (2000). Genes, culture, democracy, and happiness. In E. Diener, & E. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 165–183). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  47. Kohler, U. (2007). Quality assessment of European surveys. Towards an open method of coordination for survey data. In J. Alber, T. Fahey, & C. Saraceno (Eds.), Handbook of quality of life in enlargement Europe. London: Routledge (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  48. Layard, R. (2005). Happiness. Lessons from a new science. London/New York: Penguin Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Leibfried, S. (1992). Towards a European welfare state? On integrating poverty regimes into the European community. In Z. Ferge, & J. E. Kolberg (Eds.), Social policy in a changing Europe (pp. 245–279). Frankfurt a. M.: Campus.Google Scholar
  50. Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Evanston.Google Scholar
  51. Nauenburg, R., & Mertel, B. (2004). European quality of life survey. Technical report. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung.Google Scholar
  52. Nauenburg, R. (2004). Perceived quality of society. In European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Ed.), Quality of life in Europe. First results of a new pan-European survey (pp. 71–78). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  53. Neller, K. (2004). Politik und Lebenszufriedenheit. In J. W. van Deth (Ed.), Deutschland in Europa (pp. 27–54). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  54. Oswald, A. J. (1997). Happiness and economic performance. Economic Journal, 107(445), 1815–1831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Oswald, A. J., & Clark, A. E. (1994). Unhappiness and unemployment. Economic Journal, 104, 648–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ryan, M. R., & Deci, A. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaemonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sen, A. (1993). Capability and well-being. In M. Nussbaum, & A. Sen (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 30–53). Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Siaroff, A. (1994). Work, welfare and gender equality. A new typology. In D. Sainsbury (Ed.), Gendering welfare states (pp. 82–100). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  60. Veenhoven, R. (1984). Conditions of happiness. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  61. Veenhoven, R. (1993). Happiness in nations. Subjective appreciation of life in 56 nations 1946–1992. Rotterdam: Erasmus University.Google Scholar
  62. Veenhoven, R. (1996). Happy-life expectancy: A comprehensive measure of quality of life in countries. Social Indicators Research, 39, 1–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Veenhoven, R. (1997). Advances in the understanding of happiness. Revue québécoise de psychologie, 18, 267–293.Google Scholar
  64. Veenhoven, R. (2000). The four qualities of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wippler, R. (1990). Cultural resources and participation in high culture. In M. Hechter, K.-D. Opp, & R. Wippler (Eds.), Social institutions. Their emergence, maintenance and effects (pp. 187–204). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Unit: Inequality and Social IntegrationSocial Science Research Center BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations