Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 87, Issue 2, pp 223–236 | Cite as

Cross-National Variation in Individual Life Satisfaction: Effects of National Wealth, Human Development, and Environmental Conditions

  • Astra N. BoniniEmail author
Article

Abstract

This study adds to the literature on subjective well-being and life satisfaction by exploring variation in individual life satisfaction across countries. Understanding whether and how individual life satisfaction varies across countries is important because if the goal of development is to increase well-being, we must identify the causes of well-being in different national and regional contexts. Using hierarchical linear modeling techniques, I test the hypothesis that individual well-being does vary across countries, and that national wealth, human development and environmental conditions explain this variation. I also test whether the effects of individual characteristics on life satisfaction (including age, marital status, education, income, employment status, and sex) vary across countries, and which country level characteristics explain these variations. Using individual level data from the World Values Survey, I find that there is significant variation in life satisfaction across countries. There is also significant variation in the slopes of individual predictors of life satisfaction across countries and regions. Regional differences in the effects of individual characteristics on life satisfaction explain most of the between country variation in life satisfaction. This indicates that universal development indicators may not adequately reflect differences in life satisfaction across countries, and that development measurements should better reflect regional differences.

Keywords

Development Well-being Life satisfaction Welfare indicators Cross-national research Human development Environmental sustainability 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Lingxin Hao and Stephen Plank for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper. I would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers at Social Indicators Research for their comments.

References

  1. Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN) of Columbia University. (2001). http://www.sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/es/esi/
  2. Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (1994). Unhappiness and unemployment. Economic Journal, 104, 648–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Diener, E., Sandvik, E., Seidlitz, L., & Diener, M. (1993). The relationship between income and subjective well-being: Relative or absolute? Social Indicators Research, 28, 195–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Diener, E., & Seligman, M. P. (2004). Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Diener, E., Suh, M., Lucas, E., & Smith, H. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fukuda-Parr, S. (2003). Editor’s Note. Journal of Human Development, 4(2), 163–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Graham, C., & Pettinato, P. (2002). Frustrated achievers: Winners, losers and subjective well-being in new market economies. The Journal of Development Studies, 38(4), 100–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hagerty, M. R. (2000). Social comparisons of income in one’s community: Evidence from national surveys of income and happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 746–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Helliwell, J. F. (2003). How’s life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being. Economic Modeling, 20(2), 331–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Herzog, A. R., & Rogers, W. L. (1981). Age and satisfaction: Data from several large surveys. Research on Aging, 3, 142–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Horley, J., & Lavery, J. J. (1995). Subjective well-being and age. Social Indicators Research, 34, 275–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Inglehart, R. World Values Survey. (2000). http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org
  13. Larson, R. (1978). Thirty years of research on the subjective well-being of older Americans. Journal of Gerontology, 33, 109–125.Google Scholar
  14. Lawn, P. A. (2003). A theoretical foundation to support the Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW), Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI), and other related indexes. Ecological Economics, 44(1), 105–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Maller, C., Townsend, M., Pryor, A., Brown, P., & St. Lege, L. (2006) Healthy nature healthy people: ‘Contact with nature’ as an upstream health promotion intervention for populations. Health Promotion International, 21(1), 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Max-Neef, M. (1995). Economic growth and quality of life: a threshold hypothesis. Ecological Economics, 15(2), 115–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Norris, P., & Zinnbauer, D. (2002). Giving Voices to the Voiceless: Good Governance, Human Development and Mass Communications. Human Development Report Occasional Paper.Google Scholar
  18. Oswald, A. J. (1997). Happiness and economic performance. Economic Journal, 107, 1815–1831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Raudenbush, S. W., & Burke, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Sabbagh, D. (2004). Affirmative action policies: An international perspective. Human Development Report Occasional Paper.Google Scholar
  21. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  22. United Nations Development Programme. (2000). Human Development Report. http://www.undp.org
  23. Veenhoven, R. (1994). Correlates of happiness: 7,836 findings from 603 studies in 69 nations 1911–1994. Unpublished manuscript, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  24. Waring, M. (1988). If women counted: A new feminist economics. San Francisco: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  25. Wilson, W. (1967). Correlates of avowed happiness. Psychological Bulletin, 67, 294–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. World Bank. (2006). World Development Indicators. (Accessed May 2006). http://www.worldbank.org

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SociologyThe Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations