Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 87, Issue 3, pp 481–493 | Cite as

Pet Dogs Benefit Owners’ Health: A ‘Natural Experiment’ in China

  • Bruce Headey
  • Fu Na
  • Richard Zheng
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper reports results from a ‘natural experiment’ taking place in China on the impact of dogs on owners’ health. Previous Western research has reported modest health benefits, but results have remained controversial. In China pets were banned in urban areas until 1992. Since then dog ownership has grown quite rapidly in the major cities, especially among younger women. In these quasi-experimental conditions, we hypothesise that dog ownership will show greater health benefits than in the West. Results are given from a survey of women aged 25–40 in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou (N = 3031). Half the respondents owned dogs and half did not. Owners reported better health-related outcomes. They exercised more frequently, slept better, had higher self-reported fitness and health, took fewer days off sick from work and were seen less by doctors. The concluding section indicates how these results may be integrated and suggests further research on the potential economic benefits of pets.

Keywords

Pets Health China Natural experiment 

References

  1. Allen, K. M., & Blascovich, J. (1991). Presence of human friends and pet dogs as moderators of autonomic responses to stress in women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 582–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, K. M., & Shykoff, B. E. (2001). Pet ownership, but not ace inhibitor therapy, blunts human blood pressure responses to mental stress. Hypertension, 38, 815–820.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, K. M., Blascovich, J., & Mendes, W. B. (2002). Cardiovascular reactivity and the presence of pets, friends and spouses: the truth about cats and dogs. Psychological Medicine, 64, 727–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beck, A. M., & Katcher, A. H. (1984). A new look at pet-facilitated psychotherapy. Journal of the American Veterinary Association, 184, 414–421.Google Scholar
  5. Friedmann, E., Katcher, A. H., Lynch, J. J., & Thomas, S. A. (1980). Animal companions and one year survival of patients after discharge from a coronary care unit. Public Health Reports, 95, 307–312.Google Scholar
  6. Friedmann, E., & Thomas, S. A. (1995) Pet ownership, social support and one year survival after acute myocardial infarction in the cardiac arrhythmic suppression trial, CAST. American Journal of Cardiology, 76, 1213–1217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fu, Na, & Zheng, R. (2003). Influences of pet ownership on the empty nester family. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 17, 31–39.Google Scholar
  8. Garrity, T. F., & Stallones, L. (1998). Effects of pet contact on human well-being: review of recent research. In C. C. Wilson, & D. C. Turner (Eds.), Companion animals in human health (pp. 3–22). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Greene, W. H. (2000) Econometric analysis (4th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  10. Headey, B. W. (1999). Health benefits and health cost savings due to pets: preliminary estimates from an Australian National Survey. Social Indicators Research, 47, 233–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Headey, B. W., Grabka, M., Kelley, J., Reddy, P., & Tseng, Y.-P. (2002). Pet ownership is good for your health and saves public expenditure too: Australian and German longitudinal evidence. Australian Social Monitor, 93–99.Google Scholar
  12. Headey, B. W., & Grabka, M. (2007). Pets and human health in Germany and Australia: national longitudinal results. Social Indicators Research, 80, 297–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jorm, A. F., Jacomb, P. A., Christensen, H., Henderson, S., Korten, A. E., & Rodgers, B. (1997). Impact of pet ownership on elderly Australians’ use of medical services: an analysis using medicare data. Medical Journal of Australia, 166, 376–377.Google Scholar
  14. Kingwell, B. A., Lomdahl, A., & Anderson, W. P. (2001). Presence of a pet dog and human cardiovascular responses to mild mental stress. Clinical Autonomic Response, 11, 313–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Matooka, M., Koike, H., Yokoyama, T., & Kennedy, N. L. (2006). Effect of dog-walking on autonomic nervous activity in senior citizens. Medical Journal of Australia, 184, 60–63.Google Scholar
  16. Ory, M. G., & Goldberg, E. L. (1983). Pet possession and life satisfaction in elderly women. In A. H. Katcher, & A. M. Beck (Eds.), New perspectives on our lives with companion animals (pp. 303–317). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  17. Parslow, R. A., & Jorm, A. F. (2003). The impact of pet ownership on health and human service use: results from a community sample of Australians aged 40 to 44 years. Anthrozoos, 16.Google Scholar
  18. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  19. Raina, P., Bonnett, B., & Waltner-Toews, D. (1998). Relationship between pet ownership and health care use among seniors, 8th Conference of the International Association of Human-Animal Interaction Organisations, Prague, Sept. 10–11.Google Scholar
  20. Robb, S., & Stegman, C. (1983). Companion animals and elderly people: a challenge for evaluations of social support. Gerontologist, 23, 277–282.Google Scholar
  21. Schwarze, J., Andersen, H., & Anger, S. (2000). Self-rated health and changes in self-rated health as predictors of mortality – first evidence from the German panel data, DIW Discussion Paper No. 203, Berlin, DIW.Google Scholar
  22. Serpell, J. A. (1991). Beneficial aspects of pet ownership on some aspects of human health and behaviour. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 84, 717–720.Google Scholar
  23. Siegel, J. M. (1990). Stressful life events and the use of physician services among the elderly: the moderating effects of pet ownership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1081–1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stasi, M. F., Amati, D., Costa, C., Resta, D., Senepa, G., Scarafioti, C., Aimonino, N., & Molaschi, M. (2004). Pet-therapy: a trial for institutionalized frail elderly patients. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Supplement, 9, 407–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Winkelmann, R. (2000). Seemingly unrelated binomial regression. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 62, 553–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wood, L., Giles-Corti, B., & Bulsara, M. (2005). The pet connection: pets as a conduit for social capital? Social Science & Medicine, 61(6), 1159–1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wright, J. C., & Moore, D. (1982). Comments on animal companions and one-year survival of patients after discharge. Public Health Reports, 97, 380–381.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Beijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations