Social Indicators Research

, Volume 86, Issue 2, pp 213–231 | Cite as

Life Goals Matter to Happiness: A Revision of Set-Point Theory

Article

Abstract

Using data from the long-running German Socio-Economic Panel Survey (SOEP), this paper provides evidence that life goals matter substantially to subjective well-being (SWB). Non-zero sum goals, which include commitment to family, friends and social and political involvement, promote life satisfaction. Zero sum goals, including commitment to career success and material gains, appear detrimental to life satisfaction. Finding that conscious life goals matter can potentially make an important contribution to SWB theory. The most widely accepted theory—set-point or dynamic equilibrium theory—essentially claims that set-points are near-automatic consequences of hereditary characteristics, including personality traits. Life goals play no role in these theories and major life events are viewed as having only a transitory effect. The SOEP panel data show that, over a 15–20 year period, non-trivial minorities record substantial changes in their set-points. This paper shows linkages between these changes and (a) the personality traits of extraversion, neuroticism and internal locus of control and (b) choice of life goals.

Keywords

Life goals Happiness Subjective well-being Set-point theory 

References

  1. Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  2. Argyle, M. (2001). The psychology of happiness. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  4. Brickman, P. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1971). ‘Hedonic relativism and planning the good society’. In M. H. Appley (Ed.), Adaptation level theory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brickman, P. D., Coates, D., & Janoff-Bulmann, R. (1978). Lottery winners and accident victims: is happiness relative? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 917–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brief, A. P., Butcher, A. H., George, J. M., & Link, K. E. (1993). Integrating bottom-up and top-down theories of subjective well-being: the case of health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 646–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. R. (1976). The quality of American life. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, A. E., Georgellis, Y., Lucas, R. E., & Diener, E. (2004). Unemployment alters the set point for life satisfaction. Psychological Science, 15, 8–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Influences of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 668–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R., (1991). The NEO PI-R. Odessa: Fla.Google Scholar
  11. Davidson, R. J. (1992). Emotion and affective style: hemispheric substrates. Psychological Science, 3, 39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davidson, R. J. (2002). Anxiety and affective style: role of prefrontal cortex and amygdale. Biological Psychiatry, 51, 68–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: the foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 213–229). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Scollon, C. (2006). Beyond the hedonic treadmill: revising the adaptation theory of well-being. Psychological Science, 61, 305–314.Google Scholar
  15. Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond money: toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 25, 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dohmen, T. (2005). Risk attitudes. DIW Discussion Paper No. 511. Berlin: DIW.Google Scholar
  18. Duesenberry, J. S. (1949). Income, saving and the theory of consumer behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David, & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth (pp. 89–125). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  20. Easterlin, R. A. (2005). ‘Building a better theory of well-being’. In L. Bruni, & P. Porta (Eds.), Economics and happiness: framing the analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Frank, R. H. (1985). The demand for unobservable and other nonpositional goods. American Economic Review, 75, 279–301.Google Scholar
  22. Frederick, S., & Loewenstein, G. (1999). In D. Kahneman, E. Diener & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: the foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 302–329). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). Happiness and economics: how the economy and institutions affect human well-being. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Fujita, F., & Diener, E. (2005). Life satisfaction set-point: stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 158–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gerlitz, J.-Y., & Schupp, J. (2005). Zur Erhebung der Big-Five-basierten persoenlichkeitsmerkmale im SOEP. www.diw.de/deutsche/produkte/publikationen/researchnotes/docs/papers/rn4.pdf.Google Scholar
  26. Harlow, R. E., & Cantor, N. (1996). Still participating after all these years: a study of life task participation in later life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1235–1249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Headey, B. W. (2006a). Subjective well-being: revisions to dynamic equilibrium theory using national panel data and panel regression methods. Social Indicators Research, 79, 369–403. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Headey, B. W. (2006b). Happiness: revising set point theory and dynamic equilibrium theory to account for long term change. DIW Discussion Paper No. 607. Berlin: DIW.Google Scholar
  29. Headey, B. W., & Wearing, A. J. (1989). Personality, life events and subjective well-being: towards a dynamic equilibrium model, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 731–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Headey, B. W., & Wearing, A. J. (1992). Understanding happiness: a theory of subjective well-being. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.Google Scholar
  31. Hirsch, F. (1976). Social limits to growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hollaender, H. (2001). On the validity of utility statements: standard theory versus Duesenberry’s. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organisation, 45, 227–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Huppert, F. (2005). Positive mental health in individuals and populations. In: F. Huppert, N. Baylis, & B. Keverne (Eds.), The Science of well-being (pp. 307–340). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Kagel, J. H., & Roth, R. E. (Eds.) (1995). The handbook of experimental economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Kasser, T., & Kanner, A. D. (Eds.) (2004). Psychology and consumer culture: the struggle for the good life in a materialistic world. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  36. Kirkcaldy, B. D., Furnham, A., & Martin, T. (1998). National differences in personality, socio-economic, and work-related economic variables. European Psychologist, 3, 255–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kluckhohn, F. R., & Strodbeck, F. L. (1961). Variations in value orientations. Evanston: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
  38. Krampen, G. (1981). IPC-Fragebogen zu Kontrollueberzeugungen (“Locus of Control”). Gottingen, Toronto, Zurich: Verlag fuer Psychologie.Google Scholar
  39. Lane, R. E. (2000). The loss of happiness in market democracies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  41. Lucas, R. E., Clark, A. E., Georgellis, Y., & Diener, E. (2003). Reexamining adaptation and the set point model of happiness: reactions to change in marital status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 527–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lykken, D. (1999). Happiness: what studies on twins show us about nature, nurture and the happiness set-point. New York: Golden Books.Google Scholar
  43. Lykken, D., & Tellegen, A. (1996). Happiness is a stochastic phenomenon. Psychological Science, 7, 186–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mehnert, T., Kraus, H. H., Nadler, R., & Boyd, M. (1990). Correlates of life satisfaction in those with a disabling condition. Rehabilitation Psychology, 35, 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ng, Y.-K. (1978). Economic growth and social welfare: the need for a complete study of happiness. Kylos, 31, 575–587.Google Scholar
  46. Nolte, H., Weischer, C., Wilkesmann, U., Maetzel, J., & Tegethoff, H. -G. (1996). Kontrolleinstellungen zum Leben und zur Zukunft – Auswertung eines neuen sozialpsychologischen Itemblocks im Sozio-oekonomischen Panel (mimeo).Google Scholar
  47. Nickerson, C., Schwarz, N., Diener, E., & Kahneman, D. (2003). Zeroing in on the dark side of the American dream: a closer look at the negative consequences of the goal for financial success. Psychological Science, 14, 531–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Okun, M. A., & George, L. K. (1984). Physician- and self-ratings of health, neuroticism and subjective well-being among men and women. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 533–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rilling, J. K., Sanfey, A. G., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). Opposing BOLD responses to reciprocated and unreciprocated altruism in putative reward pathways. Neuroreport, 15, 2539–2543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Roberts, B. W., Walton, K., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 3–27.Google Scholar
  51. Roper-Starch Organisation. (1979). Roper reports 79–1. Storrs: University of Connecticut, The Roper Center.Google Scholar
  52. Roper-Starch Organisation. (1995). Roper reports 95—1. Storrs: University of Connecticut, The Roper Center.Google Scholar
  53. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalised expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1–28, Whole No. 609.Google Scholar
  54. Samuelson, P. A. (1938). A note on the pure theory of consumer’s behavior. Economica, 5, 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Scitovsky, T. (1976). The joyless economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Scollon, C. N., & Diener, E. (2006). Love, work and changes in extraversion and neuroticism over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1152–1165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: using the new positive psychology to realise your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  58. Thoits, P. A., & Hewitt, L. N. (2001). Volunteer work and well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 42, 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Veenhoven, R. (1993). Happiness in nations, subjective appreciation of life in 56 nations, 1946–92. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Wagner, G. G., Frick, J. R., & Schupp, J. (2007). Enhancing the power of household panel studies—the case of the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP). Schmollers Jahrbuch 127(1) (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  61. Wagner, G. G. & Schupp, J. (2007). New concepts, questions and measurement instruments in the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP). Schmollers Jahrbuch 127(1) (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  62. Watson, N., & Wooden, M., (2004). ‘Assessing the quality of the HILDA Survey Wave 2 Data’. HILDA Technical Paper, 5/04.Google Scholar
  63. Wengle, H. (1986). The psychology of cosmetic surgery: a critical overview of the literature 1960–1982. Part 1. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 16, 435–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wessman, A. E., & Ricks, D. F. (1966). Mood and personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  65. Wortman, C. B., & Silver, R. C. (1987). Coping with irrevocable loss. In G. R. Vanderbos, & B. K. Bryant (Eds.), Cataclysms, crises, catastrophes: psychology in action. Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations