Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 85, Issue 3, pp 425–446 | Cite as

Environmentally Responsible Happy Nation Index: Towards an Internationally Acceptable National Success Indicator

  • Yew-Kwang NgEmail author
Article

Abstract

Amidst increasing attention to happiness studies by economists, the New Economics Foundation launched in July 2006 the Happy Planet Index (Marks et al. 2006). This is the ratio of the average happy life years (HLY) to the per capita ecological footprint of the country concerned. HLY is in turn the product of the average happiness (or life satisfaction) index and the life expectancy index. Some essential revisions to this index are proposed to reach an internationally acceptable national success indicator that aims positively at long and happy lives but negatively at the external costs of environmental disruption. Hopefully, this ‘environmentally responsible happy nation index’ will lead to some re-orientation of both the market and national governments towards something more fundamentally valuable.

Keywords

Happiness Life satisfaction Subjective well-being National success indicators Green GDP Environmental costs Happy life years Happy planet index 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author has benefited from the comments made after the speech, especially from the lengthy discussion with James Mirrlees. The author is also grateful to Lok-sang Ho, Murray Kemp, Andrew Oswald, Bernard van Praag for commenting on the first draft, and to Cora Ng for assistance in the calculation of figures reported in Tables 1 and 2. The author also wishes to thank the referee of this paper for helpful comments.

References

  1. Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: Americans’ perceptions of life quality. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong, W. E. (1951). Utility and the theory of welfare. Oxford Economic Papers, 3, 257–271.Google Scholar
  3. Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2001). Do people mean what they say? Implications for subjective survey data. American Economic Review, 91(2), 67–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  5. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1988). Personality in adulthood: a six-year longitudinal study of self-reports and spouse ratings on the NEO personality inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 853–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cummins, R. A., Eckersley, R., Pallant, J., Van vugt, J., & Misajon, R. (2003). Development a national index of subjective wellbeing: the Australian Unity Wellbeing Index. Social Indicators Research, 64, 159–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Di Tella, R., & Macculloch, R. (2006) Some uses of happiness data in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diener, E. (Ed.) (1984) Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.Google Scholar
  9. Diener, E. (Ed.) (2000). Subjective well-being: the science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55, 34–43.Google Scholar
  10. Dominitz, J., & Manski, C. F. (1999). The several cultures of research on subjective expectations. In: J. P. Smith & R. J. Willis (Eds.), Wealth, work, and health: innovations in measurement in the social sciences: essays in honor of F. Thomas Juster. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  11. Edgeworth, F. Y. (1881). Mathematical Psychics. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  12. Fordyce, M. (1988). A review of research on happiness measures: a sixty second index of happiness and mental health. Social Indicators Research, 20, 355–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002a). Happiness and economics: how the economy and institutions affect well-being. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002b). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40: 402–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Graham, C., & Pettinato, S. (2001). Happiness, markets, and democracy: Latin America in comparative perspective. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2, 237–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Graham, C., & Pettinato, S. (2002). Frustrated achievers: winners, losers, and subjective well being in new market economies. Journal of Development Studies, 38(4), 100–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hagerty, M. R., Cummins, R. A., Ferriss, A. L., Land, K., Michalos, A. C., Peterson, M., Sharpe, A., Sirgy, J., & Vogel, J. (2001). Quality of life indexes for national policy: review and agenda for research. Social Indicators Research, 55(1), 1–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hajiran, H. (2006). Toward a quality of life theory: net domestic product of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 75, 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Halstead, T. (1998). The science and politics of new measures of progress: a United States perspective. In R. Eckersley (Ed.), Measuring progress: is life getting better? (pp. 53–68). Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. Hamilton, C. (1998) Measuring changes in economic welfare: the genuine progress indicator for Australia. In R. Eckersley (Ed.), Measuring progress: is life getting better? (pp. 69–92). Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. Haybron, D. M. (2000) Two philosophical problems in the study of happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 207–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jackson, T. (2004). Chasing progress: beyond measuring economic growth. London: New Economic Foundation.Google Scholar
  23. Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (Eds.). (1999). Well-being: the foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  24. Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D., Schwartz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004). Toward national well-being accounts. American Economic Review, 94(2), 429–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kahneman, D., Wakker, P. P., & Sarin, R. (1997). Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(2), 375–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lacey, H. P., Smith, D. M., & Ubel, P. A. (2006). Hope I Die before I get old: mispredicting happiness across the adult lifespan. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(2), 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Larsen, R. J., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1999). Measurement issues in emotion research. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: the foundations of hedonic psychology (Chapter 3, pp. 40–60). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  29. Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: lessons from a new science. New York and London: Penguin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Loh, J., & Wackernagel, M. (Eds.). (2004). Living Planet Report 2004. Switzerland: Gland.Google Scholar
  31. Luttmer, E. F. (2005). Neighbors as negatives: relative earnings and well-being. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(3), 963–1002.Google Scholar
  32. Manski, C. F. (2000). Economic analysis of social interactions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 115–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marks, N., et al. (2006), The Happy Planet Index (New Economics Foundation, London). Available at http://www.happyplanetindex.org
  34. Mueller, D. C. (2003). Public Choice III. Cambridge England & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Namazie, C., & Sanfey, P. (2001). Happiness and transition: the case of Kyrgyzstan. Review of Development Economics, 5(3), 392–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ng, Y.-K. (1975). Bentham or Bergson? Finite sensibility, utility functions, and social welfare functions. Review of Economic Studies, 42, 545–570.Google Scholar
  37. Ng, Y.-K. (1984). Expected subjective utility: is the Neumann–Morgenstern utility the same as the neoclassical’s? Social Choice and Welfare, 1(3), 177–186.Google Scholar
  38. Ng, Y.-K. (1996). Happiness surveys: some comparability issues and an exploratory survey based on just perceivable increments. Social Indicators Research, 38(1), 1–29.Google Scholar
  39. Ng, Y.-K. (1999). Utility, informed preference, or happiness? Social Choice and Welfare, 16(2), 197–216.Google Scholar
  40. Ng, Y.-K. (2000). Efficiency, equality, and public policy: with a case for higher public spending. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave/MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  41. Ng, Y.-K. (2007). Happiness or life satisfaction: a philosophical perspective. Typescript.Google Scholar
  42. Ng, Y.-K., & Ho, L. S. (2006). Happiness and public policy: an introduction. In Happiness and public policy: theory, case studies, and implications. London: Palgrave/Macmillan.Google Scholar
  43. Ott, J. (2005). Level and inequality of happiness in nations: does greater happiness of a greater number imply greater inequality in happiness? Journal of Happiness Studies, 6(4), 397–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pattanaik, P. K., & Salles, M. (2005). An interview with I.M.D. Little. Social Choice and Welfare, 25(2–3), 357–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pavot, W. (1991). Further validation of the satisfaction with life scale: evidence for the convergence of well-being measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pinquart, M. (2001). Age differences in perceived positive affect, negative affect, and affect balance in middle and old age. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2, 375–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Robbins, L. (1932). An essay on the nature and significance of economic science. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  48. Sandvik, E., Diener, E., & Seidlitz, L. (Eds.) (1993). Subjective well-being: the convergence and stability of self-report and non-self report measures. Journal of Personality, 61(3), 317–342.Google Scholar
  49. Schwarz, N., & Sarack, F. (1999). Reports of subjective well-being: judgmental processes and their methodological implications. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: the foundations of hedonic psychology (Chapter 3, pp. 40–60). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  50. Seidlitz, L., Wyer, R. S., Jr., & Diener, Ed. (1997). Cognitive correlates of subjective well-being: the processing of valenced life events by happy and unhappy persons. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(2), 240–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shedler, J., Mayman, M., & Manis, M. (1993). The illusion of mental health. American Psychologist, 48(11), 1117–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stone, A. A., Shiffman, S. S., & DeVries, M. W. (1999). Ecological momentary assessment, Chapter 2 in Kahneman, Diener, & Schwarz, pp. 26–39.Google Scholar
  53. Sutton, S., Davidson, R. (1997). Prefrontal brain symmetry: a biological substrate of the behavioural approach and inhibition systems. Psychological Sciences, 8(3), 204–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. United Nations’ Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Millennium Development Goals Indicators.Google Scholar
  55. van Praag, B., & Ferrer-I-Carbonell, A. (2004). Happiness quantified: a satisfaction calculus approach. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Veenhoven, R. (1984). Conditions of happiness. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  57. Veenhoven, R. (1996). Happy life-expectancy: a comprehensive measure of quality-of-life in Nations. Social Indicators Research, 39, 1–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Veenhoven, R. (2005). Apparent quality-of-life in nations: how long and happy people live. Social Indicators Research, 71(1–3), 61–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia

Personalised recommendations