Social Indicators Research

, Volume 85, Issue 1, pp 97–110 | Cite as

Volunteerism and residential longevity in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

  • Allison M. Williams
  • Nazeem Muhajarine
  • James Randall
  • Ronald Labonte
  • Peter Kitchen
Article

Abstract

This paper examines volunteerism across three neighbourhood types that are differentiated by socio-economic status (SES) in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada. The three neighbourhood types are defined as Low, Middle and High SES. The study used data collected from two telephone surveys (n = 968 in 2001, n = 997 in 2004) using random-digit dialling, together with in-depth interview data collected from a selected set of survey participants (n = 90). Neighbourhood type and length of residence are shown to have a strong bearing on volunteerism. The interview data illustrates that the quality of volunteer activity that residents engage in differs across neighbourhood types.

Keywords

Volunteerism Neighbourhood socio-economic status Residential longevity 

References

  1. Beckley, T., & Sprenger, A. (1995). Social, political and cultural dimension of forest dependence: The communities of the lower winnipeg basin. In The Economic, social, political and cultural dimensions of forest-dependence in Eastern Manitoba (pp. 22–61). Brandon: The Rural Development Institute, Brandon University.Google Scholar
  2. Brock, K. L. (2001). Promoting voluntary action and civic society through the state. Isuma, 2(2), 53–61.Google Scholar
  3. Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Choi, L. H. (2003). Factors affecting volunteerism among older adults. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 22(2), 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Coffman, D. D., & Adamek, M. S. (1999). The contributions of wind band participation to quality of life of senior adults. Music Therapy Perspectives, 17(1), 27–31.Google Scholar
  7. Crist-Houran M. (1996). Efficacy of volunteerism for role-loss depression: A complement to Weinstein et al. Psychological Reports, 73(3, Pt1), 736–738.Google Scholar
  8. Curtis, J. E., Baer, D. E., & Grabb, E. G. (2001). Nations of joiners: Explaining voluntary association membership in democratic societies. American Sociological Review, 66(6), 783–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fyfe, N., & Milligan, C. (2003). Out of the shadows: Exploring contemporary geographies of voluntarism. Progress in Human Geography, 27(4), 397–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fyfe, N., & Milligan, C. (2003). Space, citizenship, and voluntarism: Critical reflections on the voluntary sector in Glasgow. Environment and Planning A, 35, 2069–2086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hall, M., Knighton, T., Reed, P., Bussiere, P., McRae, D., & Bowen, P. (1998). Caring Canadians, involved Canadians: Highlights from the 1997 national survey of giving, volunteering and participating. Ottawa: Minister of Industry.Google Scholar
  12. Hall, M., McKeown, L., & Roberts, K. (2001). Caring Canadians, involved Canadians: Highlights from the 2000 national survey of giving, volunteering and participating. Ottawa: Ministry of Industry.Google Scholar
  13. Harris, A., & Thorensen, C. E. (2005). Volunteering is associated with delayed mortality in older people: Analysis of the longitudinal study of aging.Google Scholar
  14. Hwang, M., Grabb, E., & Curtis, J. (2005). Why get involved? Reasons for voluntary-association activity among Americans and Canadians. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34(3), 387–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnson, M. K., Beebe, T., Mortimer, J. T., & Snyder, M. (1998). Volunteerism in adolescence: A process perspective. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 8(3), 309–332. .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kawachi, I., & Berkman, L. (2000). Social cohesion, social capital, and health, In L. Berkman & I. Kawachi (Eds.), Social epidemiology (pp. 174–190). New York: Oxford Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kenworthy Teather, E. (1992a). The first rural women’s network in NSW: Seventy years of the country women’s association. Australian Geography, 23, 164–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kenworthy Teather, E. (1992b). Remote rural women’s ideologies, spaces and networks: The example of the country women’s association of New South Wales 1922–1992. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 28, 369–390.Google Scholar
  19. Kenworthy Teather, E. (1996a). Mandate of the country women’s association of New South Wales. Journal of Social Issues, 31, 73–94.Google Scholar
  20. Kenworthy Teather, E. (1996b). Rural women’s self-concepts and aspirations as members of selected voluntary organizations in New Zealand, Australia and Canada. The New Zealand Geographer, 52(2), 35–45.Google Scholar
  21. Kenworthy Teather, E. (1997a). Voluntary Organizations as Agents in the Becoming of Place. The Canadian Geographer, 41(3), 226–234. .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kenworthy Teather, E. (1997b). The Touch of Silk: Tailoring rural women’s organisations in Canada, New Zealand and Australia, 1897–1927. Journal of Australian Studies, 52, 102–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Milligan, C., & Fyfe, N. R. (2004). Putting the voluntary sector in its place: Geographical perspectives on voluntary activity and social welfare in Glasgow. Journal of Social Policy, 33(1), 73–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Milligan, C., & Conradson, D. (Eds.) (2006). Landscapes of voluntarism: New spaces of health, welfare and governance. Portland, OR, USA: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  25. Musick, M. A., Herzog, A. R., & House, J. S. (1999). Volunteering and mortality among older adults: Findings from a national sample. Journals of Gerontology: Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 54B(3), S173–S180.Google Scholar
  26. Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  28. Reed, P. B., & Howe, V. J. (1999). Voluntary organizations in Ontario in the 1990. Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Nonprofit Sector Knowledge Base Project.Google Scholar
  29. Reed, P. B., & Selbee, L. K. (2000). Volunteering in Canada in the 1990s: Change and stasis. Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Nonprofit Sector Knowledge Base Project.Google Scholar
  30. Reed, P. B., & Selbee, L. K. (2001). Canada’s civic core. Isuma, 2(2), 28–33.Google Scholar
  31. Reed, P., & Selbee, L. K. (2003). Do people who volunteer have a distinct ethos? A Canadian study. In P. Dekker & L. Halman (Eds.), The values of volunteering: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 91–109). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.Google Scholar
  32. Reiner, T., & Wolpert, I. (1981). The non-profit sector in the metropolitan economy. Economic Geography, 57, 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Roberts, J. M., & Devine, F. (2004). Some everyday experiences of voluntarism: Social capital, pleasure, and the contingency of participation. Social Politics, 11(2), 280–296.Google Scholar
  34. Vaillancourt, F. (1994). To volunteer or not: Canada, 1987. Canadian Journal of Economics, 27(4), 813–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Williams, A., Labonte, R., Randall, J., & Muhajarine N. (2006). Establishing and sustaining Community-University partnerships: A case study of quality of life research. Critical Public Health (Special Population Health Issue).Google Scholar
  36. Williams, A., Labonte, R., Randall, J., & Muharjarine, N. (2005) Establishing and sustaining Community-University partnerships: A case study of quality of life research. Critical Public Health, 15(3), 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wolch, J. R. (1983). The voluntary sector in urban communities. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 1, 181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wolch, J. R., & Geiger, R. (1983). The distribution of urban voluntary resources: An exploratory analysis. Environment and Planning A, 15, 1067–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Woolley, F. (2001). The strengths and limits of the voluntary sector. Isuma, 2(2), 21–27.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Allison M. Williams
    • 1
  • Nazeem Muhajarine
    • 2
  • James Randall
    • 3
  • Ronald Labonte
    • 4
  • Peter Kitchen
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Geography and Earth SciencesMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  2. 2.Department of Community Health & EpidemiologyUniversity of SaskatchewanSaskatoonCanada
  3. 3.College of Arts, Social and Health SciencesUniversity of Northern British ColumbiaPrince GeorgeCanada
  4. 4.Institute of Population HealthUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations