Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 84, Issue 3, pp 349–361 | Cite as

Indicators of child well-being through a neighborhood lens

  • Claudia J. Coulton
  • Jill E. Korbin
Article

Abstract

Adverse child outcomes tend to be concentrated in neighborhoods with constellations of adverse conditions and risk factors. This paper examines the challenges of developing meaningful and useful indicators of child well-being at the level of the neighborhood. Recent technological advances have made it more feasible for communities to develop neighborhood indicators, but there are a number of practical, conceptual and methodological challenges that are involved in this work. In this article, we discuss the potential usefulness of neighborhood indicators, several of the conceptual and methodological challenges and offer some illustrations of neighborhood indicators that are pertinent to the well-being of children. In addition to administrative data, we discuss indicators of child well-being rooted in both child and adult perceptions of neighborhood.

Keywords

Neighborhood Social Indicators Child well being 

References

  1. Allard, S., Rosen, D., & Tolman, R. (2003). Access to mental health and substance abuse services among women receiving welfare in Detroit. Urban Affairs Review, 38, 787–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Boston: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  3. Barnes, J., Katz, I., Korbin, J. E., & O’Brien, M. (2006). Children and families in communities: Theory, research, policy and practice. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  4. Ben-Arieh, A. (2005a). Is the study of the “state of our children” changing? re-visiting after 5 years. Children and Youth Services Review, 28(7), 799–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ben-Arieh, A. (2005). Where are the children? Children’s role in measuring and monitoring their well-being. Social Indicators Research, 74, 573–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brooks-Gunn, J., Aber, L., & Duncan, G. (Eds.). (1997). Neighborhood poverty: Context and consequences for children. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  7. Burrows, R., & Ellison, N. (2004). Sorting places out? Towards a social politics of neighbourhood informatisation. Information, Communication and Society, 7, 321–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement), S95–S120.Google Scholar
  9. Coulton, C. J., Korbin, J. E., Chan, T., & Su, M. (2001). Mapping residents’ perceptions of neighborhood boundaries: a methodological note. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29(2), 371–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coulton, C. J., Korbin, J. E., & Su, M. (1996). Measuring neighborhood context for young children in an urban area. American Journal of Community Psychology, 24(1), 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coulton, C. J., Korbin, J. E., Su, M., & Chow, J. (1995). Community level factors and child maltreatment rates. Child Development, 66, 1262–1276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellen, I., & Turner, M. (1997). Does neighborhood matter? Assessing recent evidence. Housing Policy and Debate, 8, 833–866.Google Scholar
  13. Entwisle, B. (1991). Micro-macro theoretical linkages in social demography: A commentary. In J. Huber (Ed.), Macro-micro linkages in sociology (pp. 280–286). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Goerge, R., Van Voorhis, J., & Lee, B. J. (1994). Illinois longitudinal and relational child and family research database. Social Science Computer Review, 12, 351–365.Google Scholar
  15. Grannis, R. (1998). The importance of trivial streets: Residential streets and residential segregation. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 1530–1564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heywood, D. I., Cornelius, S., & Carver, S. (1998). Introduction to geographical information systems. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
  17. Korbin, J. E., Coulton, C. J., Chard, S., Platt-Houston, C., & Su, M. (1998). Impoverishment and child maltreatment in African American and European American neighborhoods. Development and Psychopathology, 10, 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lemeshow, S., Hosmer, D. W., Klar, J., & Lwanga, S. K. (1990). Adequacy of sample size in health studies. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  19. Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2000). The neighborhoods they live in: The effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 309–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Logan, J.R., & Alba, R. D. (1993). Locational returns to human capital: Minority access to suburban community resources. Demography, 30, 243–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Massey, D. S. (2004). Segregation and stratification: A biosocial perspective. DuBois Review: Social Science Research and Race, 1, 1–19.Google Scholar
  22. Melton, G., & Berry, F. (Eds.). (1994). Protecting children from abuse and neglect: Foundations for a new national strategy. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  23. Noble, M., Wright, G., Smith, G., & Dibben, C. (2006). Measuring multiple deprivation at the small area level. Environment and Planning, 38, 169–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. O’Brien, R. M. (1990). Estimating the reliability of aggregate-level variables based on individual-level characteristics. Sociological Methods and Research, 18, 473–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pettit, K. L. S., Kingsley, G. T., & Coulton, C. J. (2003). Neighborhoods and health: Building evidence for local policy. Washington D.C.: The Urban Institute. http://www2.urban.org/nnip/health03.html.
  26. Sabol, W., Coulton, C. J., & Polousky, E. (2004). Measuring child maltreatment risk in communities: A life table approach. Child Abuse and Neglect, 28, 967–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 227, 918–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J., & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing “neighborhood effects”: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 443–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith, S. K., & Cody, S. (1994). Evaluating the housing unit method. American Psychological Journal, 60, 209–221.Google Scholar
  30. Spilsbury, J. (2005). “We don’t really get to go out in the front yard” – children’s home range and neighborhood violence. Children’s Geographies, 3(1), 79–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Spilsbury, J., & Korbin, J. E. (2004). Negotiating the dance: Social capital from the perspective of neighborhood children and adults. In P. Pufall & R. Unsworth (Eds.), Rethinking childhood (pp. 191–206). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. .Google Scholar
  32. United Nations Human Settlements Program. (2006). http://www.unhabitat.org/programmes/guo/guo_indicators.asp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center on Urban Poverty and Social Change, Mandel School of Applied Social SciencesCase Western Reserve UniversityClevelandUSA
  2. 2.Schubert Center for Child Studies, College of Arts and SciencesCase Western Reserve UniversityClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations