Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 85, Issue 2, pp 243–256 | Cite as

Critical factors for improving social sustainability of urban renewal projects

  • Edwin Chan
  • Grace K. L. LeeEmail author
Article

Abstract

This study reviews the sustainable urban design concept and identifies critical factors for enhancing social sustainability of urban renewal projects. Through a questionnaire survey carried out in Hong Kong, the opinions of architects, planners, property development managers, and local citizens were sought and evaluated. The results derived from factor analysis indicated that certain design features should be incorporated for achieving social sustainability. “Satisfaction of Welfare Requirements”, “Conservation of Resources & the Surroundings”, “Creation of Harmonious Living Environment”, “Provisions Facilitating Daily Life Operations”, “Form of Development” and “Availability of Open Spaces” were believed to be the significant underlying factors for enhancing social sustainability of local urban renewal projects.

Keywords

Urban renewal Sustainable urban design Social sustainability Factor analysis Hong Kong 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This study is supported by research grant provided by the Hong Kong Polytechnic University

References

  1. Adams, D., & Hastings, E. M. (2001). Urban renewal in Hong Kong: Transition from development corporation to renewal authority. Land Use Policy, 18(3), 245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (2002). Statistics for the behavioral and social sciences: A brief course. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Berke, P., & Manta Conroy, M. (2000). Are we planning for sustainable development? An evaluation of 30 comprehensive plans. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(1), 21–33.Google Scholar
  4. Che Musa, C. O. (2000). Urbanization versus urban planning practice in Malaysia: Considerations, prospects and possibilities. In A. G. O. Yeh & M. K. Ng (Eds.), Planning for a better urban living environment in Asia (pp. 54–68). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  5. Chan E.H., & Yung E. H. K. (2004). Is the development control legal framework conducive to a sustainable dense urban development in Hong Kong? Habitat International, 28, 409–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chiu, R. L. H. (2003). Social sustainability, sustainable development and housing development: The experience of Hong Kong. In R. Forrest & J. Lee (eds.), Housing and social change: East-west perspectives (pp. 221–239). USA: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment (CABE), and Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR) (2001). The value of urban design: A research project commissioned by CABE and DETR to examine the value added by good urban design. London: Thomas Telford.Google Scholar
  8. Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  9. Corbett, J., & Corbett, M. (2000). Designing sustainable communities: Learning from village homes. Canada: Island Press.Google Scholar
  10. Couch, C. (1990). Urban renewal theory and practice. London: Macmillan Education Ltd.Google Scholar
  11. Couch, C., & Dennemann, A. (2000). Urban regeneration and sustainable development in Britain. The example of the Liverpool Ropewalks Partnership. Cities, 17(2), 137–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Council for Sustainable Development. (2004). Report on the urban living space pilot area forum. In Sustainable development: Making choices for our future—Pilot area forum (Council for Sustainable Development, Hong Kong), 11 September (2004).Google Scholar
  13. Cuthbert, A. R., & Dimitriou, H. T. (1992). Redeveloping the fifth quarter—A case study of redevelopment in Hong Kong. Cities, 9(3), 186–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Vaus, D. A. (2001). Research design in social research. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  15. DETR (2000). By design: urban design in the planning system: Towards better practice. London: Thomas Telford.Google Scholar
  16. Enyedi, G. (2002). Social sustainability of large cities. Ekistics, 69 (412–414), 142–144.Google Scholar
  17. Fung, A. Y. S. (2004). Sustainable development and the conservation of natural and cultural heritage. In T. Mottershead, (Ed.), Sustainable development in Hong Kong (pp. 387–420). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Grange, A. L. (2004). Sustainable development and housing. In T. Mottershead (Ed.), Sustainable development in Hong Kong (pp. 323–352). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Housing Planning and Lands Bureau (2001). Urban renewal strategy. Hong Kong: Housing Planning and Lands Bureau.Google Scholar
  20. Kim, J. O., & Mueller, C. W. (1978). Factor analysis: Statistical methods and practical issues. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  21. Kline P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Lai K. T. (2002). Long Walk to Sustainability. South China Morning Post, 13 September (2002).Google Scholar
  23. Lee, J. S. (2003). Enhancing sustainability in downtown by triple-value adding to urban redevelopment efforts: A case study of Seoul, Korea. Unpublished Thesis. University of Washington.Google Scholar
  24. Li, M. M., & Brown, H. J. (1980). Micro-neighborhood externalities and hedonic housing prices. Land Economics, 56(2), 125–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ng, M. K. (2002). Property-led urban renewal in Hong Kong: Any place for the community? Sustainable Development, 10(3), 140–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ng, M. K., Cook, A., & Chui, E. W. T. (2001). The road not travelled: A sustainable urban regeneration strategy for Hong Kong. Planning Practice and Research, 16(2), 171–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oktay, D. (2004), Urban design for sustainability: A study on the Turkish City. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 11(1), pp. 24–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Omann, I., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2002). Assessing social sustainability: The social dimension of sustainability in a socio-economic scenario. In 7th biennial conference of the International Society for Ecological Economics in Sousse (Sustainable Europe Research Institute (SERI), Tunisia), 6–9 March 2002.Google Scholar
  29. Planning Department. (2002a). Hong Kong 2030: Planning vision and strategy. Retrieved October 23rd, (2004), from http://www.info.gov.hk/planning/index_e.htm.
  30. Planning Department (2002b). Urban design guidelines for Hong Kong: Executive summary. Hong Kong: Hong Kong SAR.Google Scholar
  31. Porta, S., & Renne, J. L. (2005). Linking urban design to sustainability: Formal indicators of social urban sustainability field research in Perth, Western Australia. Urban Design International, 10(1), 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rothenberg, J. (1969). Economic evaluation of urban renewal: Conceptual foundation of benefit-cost analysis. Washington: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  33. Samson, P. (1995). The concept of sustainable development. discussion paper. Switzerland: Green Cross International.Google Scholar
  34. Shearlock C., James P., & Phillips, J. (2000). Regional sustainable development: Are the new regional development agencies armed with the information they require? Sustainable Development, 8(2), 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smith, P. C. (2000). Sustainability and urban design. In W. S. Wong & E. H. W. Chan (Eds.), Building Hong Kong: Environmental considerations (pp. 17–42). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Stiglitz, J. E. (2001). Employment, social justice, and societal well-being. In ILO Global employment forum 1–3 (Labour Organization, Ghent), November (2001).Google Scholar
  37. Urban Renewal Authority: (2003), Urban renewal authority Annual Report 2002–2003 (Urban Renewal Authority, Hong Kong).Google Scholar
  38. Vandell, K. D., Lane, J. S., & Kain, J. F. (1989). The Economics of architecture and urban design: Some preliminary findings. AREUE Journal, 17(2), 235–265.Google Scholar
  39. World Commission on Environment, Development (WCED) (1987). Our common future. UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Building and Real EstateThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHunghomHong Kong

Personalised recommendations