Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 83, Issue 3, pp 487–496 | Cite as

Reliability reporting practices in youth life satisfaction research

  • Matt VassarEmail author
  • William Hale
Original Paper

Abstract

Due to the emergence of positive psychology in recent years, a growing line of research has focused on aspects of psychological wellness rather than psychopathology. Within the context of positive psychology, life satisfaction has emerged as a key variable of study in relation to adult and youth populations. Accurate measurement of life satisfaction and subsequent interpretation of results requires that the assessment devices yield strong psychometric properties. In terms of consistent measurement, reliability estimates must be calculated with each administration, as changes in sample characteristics may alter the scale’s ability to generate reliable scores. Therefore, the present study was designed to address reliability reporting practices for three youth life satisfaction measures. Seventy-three occasions of use were identified in the literature for the three scales examined in this study. Results suggest that greater than half of the life satisfaction studies calculated reliability coefficients from their own data. A discussion of reliability from classical test theory is provided, examples of correct reliability reporting practices are given, and implications for reporting reliability are discussed.

Keywords

Life Satisfaction Reliability Youth Positive psychology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Educational Research Association (1999). American Psychological Association, and National Council of Measurement in Education. Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  2. Barnes, L. L. B, Harp, D., & Jung, W. S. (1998). Reliability generalization of scores on the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 603–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buhi, E. (2005). Reliability reporting practices in rape myth research. Journal of School Health, 75, 63–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caruso, J. C., & Edwards, S. (2001). Reliability generalization of the Junior Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crocker, L., Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to modern and classical test theory. Fort Worth: Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  6. Dew, T., & Huebner, E. S. (1994). ‘Adolescents’ perceived quality of life: An exploratory investigation. Journal of School Psychology, 32, 185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Edwards, L. (2004). Measuring perceived social support in Mexican American youth: Psychometric properties of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 26, 187–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Funk, B., Huebner, S., & Valois, R. (2006). Reliability and validity of a brief life satisfaction scale with a high school sample. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Furr, R. M., & Funder, D. (1998). A multimodal analysis of personal negativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1580–1591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gilman, R., & Huebner, S. (2003). A review of life satisfaction research among children and adolescents. School Psychology Quarterly, 18, 192–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gilman, R., Ashby, J., Sverko, D., Florell, D., & Varjas, K. (2005). The relationship between perfectionism and multidimensional life satisfaction among Croatian and American youth. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 155–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Greenspoon, P., & Saklofske, D. (1997). Validity and reliability of the multidimensional students’ life satisfaction scale with Canadian children. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 15, 138–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gross, E. F. (2004). Adolescent internet use: What we expect, what teens report. Applied Developmental Psychology, 25, 633–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Henson, R. K. (2001). Understanding internal consistency reliability estimates: A conceptual primer on coefficient alpha. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 177–189.Google Scholar
  15. Henson, R. K., & Thompson, B. (2002). Characterizing measurement error in scores across studies: Some recommendations for conducting “reliability generalization” studies. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 35, 113–126.Google Scholar
  16. Huebner, S., Suldo, S. M., Smith, L. C., & McKnight, C. G. (2004). Life satisfaction in children and youth: Empirical foundations and implications for school psychologist. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huebner, S., Suldo, S., & Valois, R. (2003). Psychometric properties of two brief measures of children’s life satisfaction: the students’ life satisfaction scale and the brief multidimensional students’ life satisfaction scale. Indicators of Positive Development Conference.Google Scholar
  18. Huebner, S. (1994). Preliminary development and validation of a multidimensional life satisfaction scale for children. Psychological Assessment, 6, 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huebner, S., & Dew, T. (1994). The interrelationships of positive affect, negative affect and life satisfaction in an adolescent sample. Social Indicators Research, 38, 129–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lazarus, R. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Lewinsohn, P., Redner, J., & Seeley, J. (1991). The relationship between life satisfaction and psychological variables: New perspectives in subjective well-being. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  22. Meier, S. T., & Davis, S. R. (1990). Trends in reporting psychometric properties of scales used in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, 113–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Park, N. (2005). Life satisfaction among Korean children and youth. School Psychology International, 26, 209–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Measurement, Design, and Analysis: An Integrated Approach. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  25. Reinhardt, B. (1996). Factors affecting coefficient alpha: A mini Monte Carlo study. In B. Thompson (Ed.), Advances in social science methodology (pp. 3–20). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  26. Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An Introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Seligson, J., Huebner, S., & Valois, R. (2003). Preliminary validation of the brief multidimensional students’ life satisfaction scale. Social Indicators Research, 61, 121–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Suldo, S. (2006). Is extremely high life satisfaction during adolescence advantageous? Social Indicators Research, 78, 179–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Suldo, S., & Huebner, S. (2004). The role of life satisfaction in the relationship between parenting styles and adolescent problem behavior. Social Indicators Research, 66, 165–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Thompson, B. (1994). Guidelines for authors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 837–847.Google Scholar
  31. Ullman, C., & Tatar, M. (2000). Psychological adjustment among Israeli adolescent immigrants: A report on life satisfaction, self-concept, and self-esteem. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 30, 449–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vacha-Haase, T. (1998). Reliability generalization: Exploring variance in measurement error affecting score reliability across studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 6–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vacha-Haase, T., Kogan, L. R., & Thompson, B. (2000). Sample compositions and variabilities in published studies versus those in test manuals: Validity of score reliability inductions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 509–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Veenhoven, R. (1988). The utility of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 20, 333–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wilkinson, L. (2002). American Psychological Association Task Force on Statistical Inference. Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychological Journal, 54, 594–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Willson, V. L. (1980). Research techniques in AERJ articles: 1969 to 1978. Educational Research, 9, 5–10.Google Scholar
  37. Zullig, K., Huebner, S., Gilman, R., Patton, J., & Murray, K. (2005). Validation of the multidimensional students’ life satisfaction scale among college students. American Journal of Health Behavior, 29, 206–214.Google Scholar
  38. Zullig, K., Valois, R., Huebner, S., Oeltmann, J., & Drane, W. (2001). Relationship between perceived life satisfaction and adolescent substance abuse. Journal of Adolescent Health, 29, 279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Oklahoma State University, College of Osteopathic MedicineTulsaUSA
  2. 2.American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, Psychometric SocietyCushingUSA
  3. 3.Department of Health and Human PerformanceOklahoma State UniversityTulsaUSA
  4. 4.American College of Sports MedicineStillwaterUSA

Personalised recommendations