Social Indicators Research

, Volume 82, Issue 3, pp 443–461 | Cite as

Individual quality of life: can it be accounted for by psychological or subjective well-being?

  • L. Ring
  • S. Höfer
  • H. McGee
  • A. Hickey
  • C. A. O’Boyle


There is ongoing discussion in the scientific literature about the need for a more theoretical foundation to underpin quality of life (QoL) measurement. This paper applied Keyes et al.’s [J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 82 (2002) 1007] model of well-being as a framework to assess whether respondents (n = 136 students) focus on elements of subjective well-being (SWB), such as satisfaction and happiness, or on elements of psychological well-being (PWB), such as meaning and personal growth, when making individual QoL (IQoL) judgments using the Schedue of the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life (SEIQoL). The Keyes et al.’s model was confirmed and explained 41% of the variance in SEIQoL scores. Both SWB and PWB were correlated with the SEIQoL Index Score and SWB was found to be an important mediating variable in the relationship between PWB and SEIQoL. When analyzing different well-being combinations, respondents with high SWB/high PWB had significantly higher SEIQoL scores than did those with low SWB/low PWB. Respondents with high PWB/high SWB had higher SEIQoL scores than did those with high PWB/low SWB. Longitudinal studies in different patient groups are needed to explore the dynamic relationship between IQoL and well-being. Further investigation of the relationship between PWB and SWB with other instruments purporting to measure QoL would contribute to an enhanced understanding of the underlying nature of QoL.

Key words

individual quality of life psychological well-being SEIQoL subjective well-being SEM theoretical model 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



This manuscript was completed while the authors Dr. Lena Ring and Dr. Stefan Höfer were EU Marie Curie Research Fellows at the Department of Psychology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland.


  1. Anderson J.G.DW., 1988, Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach, Psychological Bulletin 103: 411–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arbuckle J., Wothke W., 1999, Amos 4.0 User`s Guide Chicago, IL, Small Waters CorporationGoogle Scholar
  3. Bollen K., Long J., 1993, Testing Structural Equation Models Newbury Park, CA, SageGoogle Scholar
  4. Boon H., Stewart M., 1998, Patient-physician communication assessment instruments: 1986 to 1996 in review Patient Education and Counselling 35: 161–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowling A., 2001, Measuring disease. Buckingham, Open University pressGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown M., Cudeck R., 1993, Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen K., Long J., (eds)., Testing Structural Eqaution Models. Newbury Park, CA, Sage, pp. 136–162Google Scholar
  7. Browne J.P., O’Boyle C.A., McGee H.M., McDonald N.J., Joyce C.R., 1997, Development of a direct weighting procedure for quality of life domains Quality of Life Research 6: 301–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Byrne B., 2001, Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, IncGoogle Scholar
  9. Crawford J.R., Henry J.D., 2004, The positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS): construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample British Journal of Psychology 43: 245–65Google Scholar
  10. Diener E., 2000, Subjective well-being. The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index American Psychologist 55: 34–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diener E., Emmons R.A., Larsen R.J., Griffin S., 1985, The Satisfaction With Life Scale Journal of Personality Assessment 49: 71–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diener E., Fujita F., 1997, Social comparisons and subjective well-being. In: Buunk B., Gibbons F., (eds.), Health, Coping and Well-Being. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., pp. 329–358Google Scholar
  13. Dijkers M.P., 2003, Individualization in quality of life measurement: Instruments and approaches Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 84: S3–S14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Drummond M.F., O.Brien B., Stoddart G.L., Torrance G.W., 1999, Methods for the Evaluation of Health Care Programmes New York, Oxford University Press IncGoogle Scholar
  15. Fava G.A., Ruini C., 2003, Development and characteristics of a well-being enhancing psychotherapeutic strategy: well-being therapy Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 34: 45–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garratt A., Schmidt L., Mackintosh A., Fitzpatrick R., 2002, Quality of life measurement: bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures BMJ 324: 1417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hart S., Fonareva I., Merluzzi N., Morh D.C., 2005, Treatment for depression and its relationship to improvement in quality in quality of life and psychological well-being in multiple sclerosis patients Quality of Life Research 14: 695–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hudson D.W., 1996, Happiness and the Limits of Satisfaction Lanham, MD, Rowman & LittlefieldGoogle Scholar
  19. Joyce C.R., Hickey A., McGee H.M., O’Boyle C.A., 2003, A theory-based method for the evaluation of individual quality of life: the SEIQoL Quality of Life Research 12: 275–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Joyce, C.R.B., H.M. McGee, C.A. O’Boyle (eds.): 1999, Individual Quality of Life: Approaches to Conceptualisation and Assessment’, xii (Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam), 234 pGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaplan G., Baron-Epel O., 2003, What lies behind the subjective evaluation of health status? Social Science & Medicine 56: 1669–1676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Keyes C.L., Shmotkin D., Ryff C.D., 2002, Optimizing well-being: the empirical encounter of two traditions Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82: 1007–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kline R., 1998, Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, New York, The Guilford PressGoogle Scholar
  24. McColl E., Meadows K., Barofsky I., 2003, Cognitive aspects of survey methodology and quality of life assessment Quality of Life Research 12: 217–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McGee H.M., O’Boyle C.A., Hickey A., O’Malley K., Joyce C.R., 1991, Assessing the quality of life of the individual: the SEIQoL with a healthy and a gastroenterology unit population Psychological Medicine 21: 749–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Michalos, A.C. 1980, North American Social Report, ‘Vol.1: Foundations, Population and Health (Dordrecht)’Google Scholar
  27. Naughton M.J., Wiklund I., 1993, A critical review of dimension-specific measures of health-related quality of life in cross-cultural research Quality of Life Research 2: 397–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. O’Boyle, C., S. Clarke, G. Corscadden, L. Ring, and S. Höfer, `Can business managers benefit from quality of life assessment and feedback?’, in International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQoL), 1st Spring 2004 ISOQOL Meeting, Boston. (Abstract)Google Scholar
  29. O’Boyle, C., H.M. McGee, A. Hickey, C.R.B. Joyce, J. Browne, and K. O’Malley, 1993, ‘The Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life’, User Manual (Department of Psychology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin)Google Scholar
  30. O’Boyle C.A., McGee H., Hickey A., O’Malley K., Joyce C.R., 1992, Individual quality of life in patients undergoing hip replacement Lancet, 339: 1088–1091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Patrick D.L., Chiang Y.P., 2000, Measurement of health outcomes in treatment effectiveness evaluations: conceptual and methodological challenges Medical Care 38: II14–25Google Scholar
  32. Prutkin J.M., Feinstein A.R., 2002, Quality-of-life measurements: origin and pathogenesis Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 75: 79–93Google Scholar
  33. Rapkin B.D., Schwartz C.E., 2004, Toward a theoretical model of quality-of-life appraisal: Implications of findings from studies of response shift Health andQuality of Life Outcomes 2: 14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ruta D.A., Garratt A.M., Leng M., Russell I.T., MacDonald L.M., 1994, A new approach to the measurement of quality of life. The Patient-Generated Index Medical Care 32: 1109–1126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ryan R.M., Deci E.L., 2001, On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being Annual Review of Psychology 52: 141–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ryff C.D., Keyes C.L., 1995, The structure of psychological well-being revisited Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69: 719–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ryff C.D., Singer B., 1996, Psychological well-being: meaning, measurement, and implications for psychotherapy research Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 65: 14–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ryff C.D., Singer B., 2002, From Social Structure to Biology. Integrative Science in Pursuit of Human Health and Well-being: Handbook of Positive Psychology Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 541–555Google Scholar
  39. Ryff C.D., Singer B.H., Dienberg Love G., 2004, Positive health: connecting well-being with biology Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London. Series B, Biological Sciences 359: 1383–1394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Seligman M.E., 2002, Authentic Happiness. Using the New Positive Psychology to Realize Your Potential for Lasting Fulfillment. London, Nicholas Brealey PublishingGoogle Scholar
  41. Skevington S.M., Sartorius N., Amir M., 2004, Developing methods for assessing quality of life in different cultural settings. The history of the WHOQOL instruments Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 39: 1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Spitzer W.O., 1987, State of science 1986: quality of life and functional status as target variables for research Journal of Chronic Diseases 40: 465–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Taillefer M.-C., Dupuis G., Roberge M.-A., Le May S., 2003, Health-related quality of life models: systemic review of the literature Social Indicators Research 64: 293–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ware J.E Jr., 2003, Conceptualization and measurement of health-related quality of life: comments on an evolving field Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 84: S43–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Watson D., Clark L.A., Tellegen A., 1988, Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54: 1063–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wiklund I., 2004, Assessment of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials: the example of health-related quality of life Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology 18: 351–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Ring
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. Höfer
    • 1
    • 3
  • H. McGee
    • 1
  • A. Hickey
    • 1
  • C. A. O’Boyle
    • 1
  1. 1.Health Services Research Centre, Department of PsychologyRoyal College of Surgeons in IrelandDublin 2Ireland
  2. 2.Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research, Department of Pharmacy, BMCUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  3. 3.Department of Medical Psychology and PsychotherapyMedical University InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria

Personalised recommendations