Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 81, Issue 2, pp 357–373 | Cite as

Changes in the quality of life of Durban’s people

  • Brian O’LearyEmail author
Article

Abstract

Durban, the busiest port and second largest industrial hub in South Africa, has a developmental vision that sees its residents living in ‚acceptably serviced housing’ and enjoying a ‚generally high quality of life that can be sustained’. This vision is in response to South Africa’s transitional aspirations to move from an inequitable apartheid state to a democratic society with greater socio-economic parity. Since 1998 the eThekwini Municipality, which is the local authority responsible for the city of Durban, has conducted annual surveys to monitor the changes in the quality of life of Durban’s people. Structured questionnaire interviews were administered in 14 300 dwellings between 1998 and 2005. The samples drawn each year were representative of the city’s demographics and covered a wide range of housing types. Results indicate that parity of life satisfaction between race groups is as far apart in 2005 as it was in 1998. The paper undertakes trend analysis, from a local government perspective, of key objective and subjective variables in the surveys. It identifies the domains that have the greatest impact on satisfaction with life, and reports the salient issues for black householders, who have the lowest level of life satisfaction.

Key Words

Durban quality of life South Africa trends 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Grunkmeyer W.T., Moss M.L. 2002, The sustainable community model approach to the development and use of multi-dimensional quality of life indicators’ In: Sirgy M.J., Rahtz D., Lee D.-L. (eds) Community Quality-of-Life Indicators Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  2. Kingdon, G.G. and J. Knight: 2004, ‚Well-being poverty versus income poverty and capabilities poverty in South Africa?’ (The Centre for the Study of African Economies. Working Paper Series, GPRG-WPS-003, Oxford), p. 35Google Scholar
  3. Marans, R.W. and M. Couper: 2000, ‚Measuring the quality of community life: A program for longitudinal and comparative international research’, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on quality of life in cities, 8–10 March, vol. 2 (University of Singapore, Singapore), pp. 386–400Google Scholar
  4. Møller V.: 2000, Monitoring quality of life in Durban, South Africa’ In: Seik F.T., Yuan L.L., Mie G.W.K. (eds) Planning for a Better Quality of Life in Cities School of Building and Real Estate, National University of Singapore Singapore pp. 313–329Google Scholar
  5. Møller V. 2000, Monitoring quality of life in Durban South African Urban Health and Development Bulletin 3(3):10Google Scholar
  6. Møller V. 2001, Monitoring quality of life in cities: The Durban case Development Southern Africa 18(2): 217–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Møller V. 2004, Researching quality of life over time: Lessons from the South African case In: Gough I., J.A. McGregor (eds) Well-Being in Developing Countries: New Approaches and Research Strategies Cambridge Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  8. O’Leary, B.: 1999, ‚South African patterns of inequality and reform relating to socio-economic status and access to services’, Chapter contributed to J.C. Thill (ed.), Spatial Multicriteria Decision Making and Analysis: A Geographic Information Sciences Approach (Ashgate, NY), pp. 223–244Google Scholar
  9. O’Leary, B.: 2001, ‚Residential quality of life and needs assessment research in durban, South Africa’, Paper presented at the Fourth Conference of the International Society for Quality of Life Studies (Washington DC), p. 25Google Scholar
  10. Pew Research Centre for the People, the Press 2002, Global Attitudes Survey Pew Research Centre for the People and the Press. Washington DC, USA p 89Google Scholar
  11. Potgieter, J.F.: 1997, ‚The household subsistence level in the major urban centres of South Africa’ (The Institute for Development Planning and Research, Fact Paper No. 105, Unversity of Port Elizabeth)Google Scholar
  12. Sanfey, P. and U. Teksoz: 2005, ‚Does transition make you happy?’ Working Paper 91 (European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, London), p. 31Google Scholar
  13. Statistics South Africa. 1996, Community Profiles Statistics South Africa. Pretoria Google Scholar
  14. Statistics South Africa. 2001, Community Profiles Statistics South Africa. Pretoria Google Scholar
  15. Wee, H.: 2000, ‚Quality of life assessment: Is quality of place an appropriate proxy?’ Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Quality of Life in Cities, 8–10 March, vol 1 (University of Singapore, Singapore), pp. 163–174Google Scholar
  16. Wegner T. 2000 Quantitative Methods for Marketing Decisions Juta Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  17. Wong, C.: 2000, ‚The relationship between quality of life and local economic development: An empirical study of local authority areas in England’, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Quality of Life in Cities, 8–10 March, vol. 1 (University of Singapore, Singapore), pp. 656–666Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Corporate Policy UniteThekwini MunicipalityDurbanSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations