Monitoring Urban Quality of Life: The Porto Experience
This paper describes the monitorin g system of the urban quality of life developed by the Porto City Council, a new tool being used to support urban planning and management. The two components of this system – a quantitative approach based on statistical indicators and a qualitative analysis based on the citizens’ perceptions of the conditions of life – are presented. The strengths and weaknesses of these two approaches adopted in the project are reviewed. It is argued that, in order to achieve a deeper understanding and more effective measurement of urban quality of life, both kinds of measurements are useful and complement each other.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- (2000). The Urban Audit – Vol. I, II and III. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
- Gatt, L.: 2003, Quality of Life in New Zealand’s Eight Largest Cities (Wellington City Council)Google Scholar
- Grayson L. and Young K. (1994). Quality of Life in Cities. An Overview and Guide to the Literature. The British Library/London Research Center, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Michalski J.H. (2001). Asking Citizens What Matters for Quality of Life in Canada. Canadian Policy Research Networks, OttawaGoogle Scholar
- Nuvolati G. (1998). La Qualità della Vita Urbana. Teorie, Metodi e Risultati della Ricerche. Franco Angeli, MilanoGoogle Scholar
- Yuan L., Yuen B. and Low C. (1999). Urban Quality of Life – Critical Issues and Options. National University of Singapore, Singapore, 1–12Google Scholar
- Wyman, M.: 2001, Quality of Life Indicators Project – Learning from Citizens What Matters for Quality of Life (Canadian Policy Research Networks, Ottawa)Google Scholar