Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 74, Issue 1, pp 9–55 | Cite as

Capabilities and Well-Being: Evidence Based on the Sen–Nussbaum Approach to Welfare

  • Paul Anand
  • Graham Hunter
  • Ron Smith
Article

Abstract

One of the most significant theoretical contributions to welfare analysis across a range of disciplines has been the development of the capabilities framework by Sen and others. Motivated by the claim that freedom should play a key role in social evaluation, the capabilities framework suggests that we consider what it is that people are free to do, as well as what they actually do. Using data from the British Household Panel Survey in conjunction with a list of substantial values posited by Martha Nussbaum, we contribute to the operationalisation and testing of this approach. Specifically, we suggest that commonly used secondary data sources do provide some information about the capabilities people have and that this can be incorporated into models of (subjective) well-being such as those used by a growing number of labour and health economists. We find evidence that a wide range of capabilities exhibit statistically significant relations to well-being that the relations are complex and slightly different for men and women, and conclude with suggestions for future developments.

Key words

capabilities happiness Nussbaum Sen 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alkire, S. 2002Valuing Freedoms: Sen’s Capability Approach and Poverty ReductionOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Anand, P. 1993The philosophy of intransitive preferenceEconomic Journal103337346Google Scholar
  3. Anand, P. and M. van Hees: 2003, ‘Capabilities and achievements’, Discussion Paper. The Open UniversityGoogle Scholar
  4. Angrist, J., Kreuger,  2001Instrumental variables and the search for identification: From supply and demand to natural experimentsJournal of Economic Perspectives156985Google Scholar
  5. Argyle, M. 2001The Psychology of Happiness2RoutledgeHoveGoogle Scholar
  6. Atkinson, A.B. 1999The contributions of Amartya Sen to welfare economicsScandinavian Journal of Economics101173190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blanchflower, D.G. and A.J. Oswald: 2000, ‘Well-being over time in Britain and the USA’, Working Paper 7487, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. Available at www.nber.org/papers/w7487Google Scholar
  8. Brandolini, A. and G.D’Alessio: 1998, ‘Measuring well-being in the functioning space’, paper given in the 12th World Congress of the International Economic Association, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaGoogle Scholar
  9. British Household Panel Survey (computer file) SN4505, 2002, Economic and Social Research Council Research Centre on Micro-Social Change, Essex: UK Data Archive (distributor), 10 AprilGoogle Scholar
  10. Cantril, H. 1965The Pattern of Human ConcernsRutgers University PressNew Brunswick, NJGoogle Scholar
  11. Carter, I. 1999A Measure of FreedomOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark, A.E., Oswald, A.J. 1994Unhappiness and unemploymentEconomic Journal.104648659Google Scholar
  13. Clark, A.E., Oswald, A.J. 1996Satisfaction and comparison incomeJournal of Public Economics61359381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diener, E., Suh, E.M., Lucas, R.E., Smith, H.L. 1999Subjective well-being: Three decades of progressPsychological Bulletin125276302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frey, B.S., Stutzer, A. 2002Happiness and Economics: How the Economy and Institutions Affect Human WellbeingPrinceton University PressPrincetonGoogle Scholar
  16. Easterlin, R.A. 2001Income and happiness: Towards a unified theoryThe Economic Journal111465484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gasper, D. 1997Sen’s capability approach and Nussbaum’s capability ethicsJournal of International Development9281302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gerdtham, U.-G., Johannesson, M. 2001The relationship between happiness, health and socioeconomic factors: Results based on Swedish micro dataJournal of Socio-Economics30553557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goldberg, D.P. 1972The Detection of Psychiatric Illness by QuestionnaireOxford University PressLondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Hausman, J.A.: 1978 `Specification texts on econometrics', Econometrica 46, pp. 1251–1271Google Scholar
  21. Kahneman, D.Diener,  E.Diener,  E. eds. 1999Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic PsychologyRussell Sage FoundationNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Layard, R.: 2003, Happiness: Has Social Science a Clue? Lionel Robbins Memorial Lectures (3–5 March), London School of Economics, Available at http://cep.lse.ac.uk/events/lectures/layard/RL030303.pdfGoogle Scholar
  23. Lykken, D., Tellegen, A. 1996Happiness is a stochastic phenomenonPsychological Science7180189Google Scholar
  24. Martinetti, E.C. 2000A multidimensional assessment of well-being based on Sen’s functioning approachRevista Internazionale di Scienze Social108207239Google Scholar
  25. Nussbaum, M.C. 2001Symposium on Amartya Sen’s Philosophy: 5 Adaptive preferences and women’s optionsEconomics and Philosophy176788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nussbaum, M.C. 2000Women and Human Development – The Capabilities ApproachCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. Qizilbash, M.: `Capabilities, well-being and human development: A survey', Journal of Development Studies 33, pp. 143–162.Google Scholar
  28. Robeyns, I. 2003Sen’s capability approach and gender inequality: Selecting relevant capabilitiesFeminist Economics96192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schwarz, N. and F. Strack: 1999, ‘Reports of subjective well-being: Judgmental processes and their methodological implications’, in Kahneman, et al. (eds.), pp. 61–84Google Scholar
  30. Sen, A.K. 1977Social choice theory: A re-examinationEconometrica455389Google Scholar
  31. Sen, A.K. 1979Personal utilities and public judgements, or What’s wrong with welfare economics?Economic Journal89537558Google Scholar
  32. Sen, A.K.: 1985, Commodities and Capabilities (North-Holland, Amsterdam) Google Scholar
  33. Sen, A.K. 1999Development as FreedomOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  34. Srinivasan, T.N. 1994Human development: A new paradigm or reinvention of the wheel?The American Economic Review84238243Google Scholar
  35. Starmer, C. 2000Developments in non-expected utility theory: The hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under riskJournal of Economic LiteratureXXXVIII332382Google Scholar
  36. Stewart, F. 1995Basic needs, capabilities and human development’ in Festschrift for Amartya SenGreek Economic Review178396Google Scholar
  37. Sugden, R. 1993Welfare, resources, and capabilities: A review of Inequality Re-examined by Amartya SenJournal of Economic LiteratureXXXVI19471962Google Scholar
  38. van Praag, B.M.S. and P. Frijters: 1999, ‘The measurement of welfare and well-being – the Leyden approach’, in Kahneman et alGoogle Scholar
  39. Veenhoven, R. 1994Correlates of Happiness (3 Vols)RISBO, Centre for Socio-Cultural TransformationsRotterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  40. Veenhoven, R. 1997Advances in understanding happinessRevue Quebecoise de Psychologie19972974Google Scholar
  41. World Values Study Group: 1994, World Value Survey, 1981–1984 and 1990–1993, Arbor, A., Michigan, Institute for Social Research, UniversityGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Economics DisciplineThe Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK
  2. 2.Birkbeck CollegeUniversity of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations