Social Indicators Research

, Volume 80, Issue 2, pp 343–360 | Cite as

Quality of College Life (QCL) of Students: Developing and Validating a Measure of Well-Being

  • M. Joseph Sirgy
  • Stephan Grzeskowiak
  • Don Rahtz
Article

Abstract

This paper reports a study designed to develop and validate a measure of quality of college life (QCL) of students. Using a theoretical model based on a build-up approach to QCL, the authors provide an empirical examination of various hierarchical components and their properties. The method is executed in two stages. The first stage is used to clarify the particular elements for inclusion in the model. The second phase uses a sample of students drawn for the campuses of three major universities in the United States. These samples were used to test several hypotheses regarding the model and its components. The results generally provide support. Finally, the discussion centers on the value of the model in application by both university officials and public policy officials in the at-large community.

Key words

college student quality of life college student well-being quality of college life of students university student quality of life university student well-being 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrews F. W. and Withey S. B. (1976). Social Indicators of Well-being: America’s Perception of Life Quality. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Benjamin M. (1994). The quality of student life: toward a coherent conceptualization. Social Indicators Research 31: 205–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bloom B. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. Logmans, Green, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Bloom B., Hastings J. and Madaus G. (1971). Handbook on Formative and Summative Evaluation of Student Learning. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell A., Converse P. E. and Rogers W. J. (1976). The Quality of American Life: Perceptions, Evaluations, and Satisfaction. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  6. Cha K-H. (2003). Subjective well-being among college students. Social Indicators Research 62(1): 455–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chow H. P. H. (2005). Life satisfaction among university students in a Canadian prairie city: A multivariate analysis. Social Indicators Research 70(2): 139–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clifton R., Etcheverry E., Hasinoff S. and Roberts L. (1996). Measuring the cognitive domain of the quality of life of university students. Social Indicators Research 38(1): 29–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen E., Clifton R. A. and Roberts L. W. (2001). The cognitive domain of the quality of life of university students: A re-analysis of an instrument. Social Indicators Research 53(1): 63–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diener E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin 75(3): 542–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diener E., Suh E., Lucas R. and Smith H. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of research. Psychological Bulletin 125: 276–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Disch W. B., Harlow L. L., Campbell J. F. and Dougan T. R. (2000). Student functioning, concerns, and socio-personal well-being. Social Indicators Research 51(1): 41–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kronholz, J.: 2005, Trends: Higher education; more students, higher prices, tougher competition. Wall Street Journal (January 31), p. R. 4Google Scholar
  14. Maggino F. and Shifini D’Andrea S. (2003). Different scales for different survey methods: validation in measuring the quality of university life. In: Sirgy, M. J., Rahtz, D. and Samli, A. C. (eds) Advances in Quality-of-life Theory and Research, pp 233–256. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  15. Makinen J. A. and Pychyl T. A. (2001). The differential effects of project stress on life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research 53(1): 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ng S. L. (2005). Subjective residential environment and its implications for quality of life among university students in Hong Kong. Social Indicators Research 71(1): 467–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pilcher J. J. (1998). Affective and daily events predictors of life satisfaction in college students. Social Indicators Research 43(3): 291–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Reynolds R. (2004). A surge in college enrollment. Black Enterprise 34(10): 34May.Google Scholar
  19. Roberts L. and Clifton R. (1992). Measuring the affective quality of life of university students: The validation of an instrument. Social Indicators Research 27: 113–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Royal M. A. and Rossi R. J. (1993). A comparative approach to assessing the quality of life of intercollegiate athletes. Social Indicators Research 29(3): 317–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sirgy M. J. (2001). Handbook of Quality-of-life Research. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  22. Sirgy M. J. (2002). The Psychology of Quality of Life. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  23. Smith J. H., Briers G. E. and Smith C. W. (2004). Correlates of quality of life of agricultural scholarship recipients. Social Indicators Research 69(1): 51–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Symonds, W. C.: 2004, Rich college, poor college. Business Week, (3913), December, 88–90Google Scholar
  25. Vaez M., Kristenson M. and Laflamme L. (2004). Perceived quality of life and self-rated health among first-year university students. Social Indicators Research 68(2): 221–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Witmer J. M. and Sweeney T. J. (1982). A holistic model for wellness and prevention over the life span. Journal of Counseling and Development 71: 140–148 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Joseph Sirgy
    • 1
  • Stephan Grzeskowiak
    • 2
  • Don Rahtz
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of MarketingPamplin College of Business, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA
  2. 2.Marketing DepartmentSt. Thomas UniversitySt. PaulUSA
  3. 3.Department of MarketingCollege of William and MaryWilliamsburgUSA

Personalised recommendations