Social Indicators Research

, 79:503

Housing Well-Being: Developing and Validating a Measure

  • Stephan Grzeskowiak
  • M. Joseph Sirgy
  • Dong-Jin Lee
  • C. B. Claiborne
Article

Abstract

Housing well-being refers to the home resident’s cumulative positive and negative affect associated with the purchase, preparation, ownership, use, and maintenance of the current home, and the selling of the previous home. Housing well-being is assumed to occur when the home is bought with the least amount of effort (purchase), the home is prepared for use to meet the needs of the new occupants (preparation), ownership signals status and enhances the home owner’s financial portfolio (ownership), the home serves the housing needs of the residents (use), the maintenance, renovation, and repair in the home are minimal, least costly, and effortless (maintenance), and the sale of the home is transacted with the least amount of effort and most financial gain (selling). Based on this conceptualization of housing well-being, we conducted an exploratory study to identify the sources of satisfaction related to the purchase, preparation, ownership, use, and maintenance of the current home, and the selling of the previous home. The exploratory study also helped us articulate a theoretical model describing the interrelationships among the housing well-being constructs and their consequence: the perceived quality-of-life (QOL) impact of the home. The exploratory study helped us also to develop survey measures, which in turn were validated through two additional studies involving surveys of home owners in the US and Korea.

Key words

housing well-being housing and quality of life housing satisfaction residential satisfaction perceived quality-of-life impact of home residential well being 

References

  1. Aaker D.A. and Day G.S. (1982). Consumerism: Search for the Public Interest. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahlbrandt R. and Cunningham J. (1979). A New Public Policy for Neighborhood Preservation . Praeger, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews F.M. and Withey S.B. (1976). Social Indicators of Well-Being. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Baillie S. and Peart V. (1992). Determinants of housing satisfaction for older married and unmarried women in Florida. Housing and Society 19: 101–116Google Scholar
  5. Birks D.F. and Southan J.M. (1992). An evaluation of the rationale of tenant satisfaction survey. Housing Studies 7: 299–308Google Scholar
  6. Boyle M.A. and Kiel K.A. (2001). A survey of house price hedonic studies of the impact of environmental externalities. Journal of Real Estate Literature 9: 117–144Google Scholar
  7. Burby R.J. and Rohe W.M. (1990). Providing for the housing needs of the elderly. Journal of the American Planning Association 56: 324–340Google Scholar
  8. Campbell A., Converse P.E. and Rodgers W.J. (1976). The Quality of American Life: Perceptions, Evaluations, and Satisfaction . Russell Sage Foundation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Dahmann D.C. (1985). Assessments of neighborhood quality in metropolitan America. Urban Affairs Quarterly 20: 511–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fried M. and Gleicher P. (1961). Some sources of residential satisfaction in an urban slum. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 19: 539–568Google Scholar
  11. Galster G. (1987). Identifying the correlates of dwelling satisfaction: an empirical Critique. Environment and Behavior 19: 539–568Google Scholar
  12. Galster G.C. and Hesser G.W. (1981). Residential satisfaction – compositional and contextual correlates. Environment and Behavior 13: 735–758Google Scholar
  13. Lansing J., Marans R. and Zehner R. (1970). Planned Residential Environments . Institute for Survey Research, University of Michigan, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee D.-J., Sirgy M.J., Larsen V. and Wright N. (2002). Developing a subjective measure of consumer well being. Journal of Macromarketing 22: 158–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lee Y. and Weber M. (1984). Development of an instrument to measure the aesthetic quality of housing environment. Social Indicators Research 15: 255–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lindquist J.D. and Sirgy M.J. (2003). Shopper, Buyer and Consumer Behavior. Atomic Dog Publishing, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  17. Lu M. (1999). Determinants of residential satisfaction: ordered logit vs. regression models. Growth and Change 30: 264–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McCracken G. (1984). The Long Interview . Sage, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar
  19. Morris E., Crull S. and Winter M. (1976). Housing norms, housing satisfaction and the propensity to move. Journal of Marriage and the Family 38: 309–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Onibokun A.G. (1976). Social system correlates of residential satisfaction. Environment and Behavior 8: 323–345Google Scholar
  21. Parkes A., Kearns A. and Atkinson R. (2002). The Determinants of Neighbourhood Dissatisfaction . ESRC Centre for Neighbourhood Research, BristolGoogle Scholar
  22. Rohe, W.M. and M.A. Stegman: 1994, The impact of home ownership on the social and political involvement of low-income people. Urban Affairs Quarterly 30Google Scholar
  23. Rossi P.H. (1980). Why Families Move . Sage, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar
  24. Satsangi M. and Kearns A. (1992). The use and interpretation of tenant satisfaction surveys in British social housing. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 10: 317–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sirgy M.J. (2001). Handbook of Quality-of-Life Research . Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  26. Sirgy M.J. and Cornwell T. (2002). How neighborhood features affect quality of life. Social Indicators Research 59: 79–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Speare A. (1974). Residential satisfaction as an intervening variable in residential mobility. Demography 11: 1973–1988Google Scholar
  28. Steenkamp J.-B.E.M. and Baumgartner H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research 25: 78–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Turnbull G.K. (1996). Real estate brokers, non-price competition and the housing market. Real Estate Economics 24: 293–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vale L.J. (1997). Empathological places: residents’ ambivalence toward remaining in public housing. Journal of Planning Education and Research 16: 159–175Google Scholar
  31. Varaday D.P. (1983). Determinants of residential mobility. Journal of the American Planning Association 49: 184–199Google Scholar
  32. Varady D.P. (1986). Neighbourhood Upgrading: A Realistic Assessment . State University of New York Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  33. Varady D.P. and Carrozza M. A. (2000). Toward a better way to measure customer satisfaction levels in public housing: a report from Cincinnati. Housing Studies 15: 797–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Varady D.P. and Preiser W.F.E. (1998). Scattered-site public housing and housing satisfaction: implications for the new public housing program. Journal of the American Planning Association 64: 189–208Google Scholar
  35. Western J.S., Weldon P.D. and Haung T.T. (1974). Housing and satisfaction with environment in Singapore. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 40: 201–208Google Scholar
  36. Whiteford P.C. and Morris E.W. (1986). Age, tenure and housing satisfaction. Housing and Society 13: 160–171Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephan Grzeskowiak
    • 1
  • M. Joseph Sirgy
    • 2
  • Dong-Jin Lee
    • 3
  • C. B. Claiborne
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of MarketingUniversity of Saint ThomasMinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Marketing, Pamplin College of BusinessVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA
  3. 3.School of BusinessYonsei UniversitySeoulKorea
  4. 4.MarketingTexas Southern UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations