Social Indicators Research

, Volume 76, Issue 3, pp 467–498 | Cite as

Social Anomie and Racial Segregation in South Africa



The concept of anomie is one of the classics of sociological theory. Developed by scholars such as Emile Durkheim and Robert K. Merton, the concept refers to the absence of clear social norms and values and to a lack of sense of social regulation. However, whereas Merton focused on features of relative deprivation that cause anomie, Durkheim was primarily interested in the link between rapid social change and social anomie. According to the latter, normative regulation is threatened with being undermined and people are likely to lack the social and psychological means for adjustment in times of rapid social change. Drawing on survey data from the South African General Household Survey polled in 2002, the article examines the ethnical differences in levels of social anomie in the South African society. In order to do so, we, first, place the South African levels of anomie into comparative context. In a second step, we look at the race specific levels of anomie. Third, we investigate whether the differences in anomie between the races are related to the still existing socio-economic inequalities or whether race can be regarded as an independent factor that impacts on anomie. Finally we scrutinize to what extent socio-economic factors account for different levels of anomie within the races.


anomie South Africa racial segregation transformation Quality of life 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adam, H., Slabbert, F.V.Z., Moodley, K. 1997Comrades in Business. Post Liberation Politics in South AfricaTafelberg PublishersCape TownGoogle Scholar
  2. Arts, W., Hermkens, P., Wijck, P. 1995‘Anomie, distributive injustice and dissatisfaction with material well-being in Eastern Europe. A comparative study’International Journal of Comparative Sociology36116Google Scholar
  3. Atteslander, P. 1999

    ‘Social change, development and anomie’

    Atteslander, P.Gransow, B.Western, J. eds. Comparative Anomie Research. Hidden barriers - hidden potential for social developmentAshgateAldershot318
    Google Scholar
  4. Berger, R: 1980, Angst und Entfremdung - zur Eindimensionalität zweier Skalen im Wohlfahrtssurvey 1978. Diskussionspapier Nr. 36, Projekt A-1, Sonderforschungsbereich 3, Frankfurt/Mannheim.Google Scholar
  5. Bohle, H.H., Heitmeyer, W., Kühnel, W., Sander, U. 1997

    ‘Anomie in der modernen Gesellschaft’

    Heitmeyer, W. eds. Was treibt die Gesellschaft auseinander?SuhrkampFrankfurt am Main2965
    Google Scholar
  6. Bullough, B. 1967‘Alienation in the Ghetto’American Journal of Sociology72469478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bulmahn, T. 2002

    ‘Globalmaße des subjektiven Wohlbefindens’

    Statistisches, Bundesamt eds. In Cooperation with Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB) and Zentrum für Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen Mannhei (ZUMA)Datenreport 2002. Zahlen und Fakten über die Bundesrepublik DeutschlandBundeszentrale für politische BildungBonn431441
    Google Scholar
  8. Campell, A. 1972

    ‘Aspiration, satisfaction and fulfillment’

    Campell, A.Converse, P. eds. The Human Meaning of Social ChangeRussell Sage FoundationNew York441446
    Google Scholar
  9. Dean, D. 1961‘Alienation Its meaning and measurement’American Sociological Review26753777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Delhey, J., Böhnke, P., Habich, R., Zapf, W. 2002Quality of life in a European perspective: The EUROMODULE as a new instrument for comparative welfare research’Social Indicators Research58161175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Devey, R., Møller, V. 2002

    ‘Closing the gap between rich and poor in South Africa’

    Glatzer, W. eds. Rich and PoorKluwerAmsterdam105122
    Google Scholar
  12. Durkheim, E. 1997The Division of Labor in SocietyFree PressNew York[1893]Google Scholar
  13. Durkheim, E. 1952Suicide. A Study in SociologyRoutledgeLondon[1897]Google Scholar
  14. Genov, N. 2000trends and Eastern European societal transformations’International Social Science Journal52539547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glatzer, W., Bös, M. 1997

    ‘Anomietendenzen im Transformationsprozess - Analysen mit dem Wohlfahrtssurvey’

    Heitmeyer, W. eds. Was treibt die Gesellschaft auseinander?SuhrkampFrankfurt am Main557585
    Google Scholar
  16. Harris, M. 1997‘Monitoring optimism in South Africa’Social Indicators Research Series41297304Google Scholar
  17. Holley, H., Jubber, K., Zapotoczky, K. 1999

    ‘Post-apartheid and double anomie in South African townships’

    Atteslander, P.Gransow, B.Western, J. eds. Comparative Anomie Research Hidden barriers - hidden potential for social developmentAshgateAldershot121158
    Google Scholar
  18. Human Development Report: several years, United Nations Development Programme, New York, UNDP.Google Scholar
  19. Hirschowitz, R., Orkin, M. 1997‘Trauma and mental health in South Africa’Social Indicators Research Series41169182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hunt, M. 1961‘A biographical profile of Robert K Merton’The New Yorker283963Google Scholar
  21. Kapsis, R.E. 1978‘Black ghetto diversity and anomie: A sociopolitical view’American Journal of Sociology8311321153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li, H., Atteslander, P., Tanur, J., Wang, Q. 1999

    ‘Anomic Scales: Measuring social instability’

    Atteslander, P.Gransow, B.Western, J. eds. Comparative Anomie Research Hidden Barriers - Hidden Potential for Social DevelopmentAshgateAldershot2345
    Google Scholar
  23. Mattes, R., C. Keulder, A. B. Chikwana, C. Africa and Y. Derek Davis: 2003, Democratic governance in South Africa: The people’s view Afrobarometer Paper No. 24Google Scholar
  24. Merton, R.K. 1938‘Social structure and anomie’American Sociological Review3672682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Merton, R.K. 1949

    ‘Social structure and anomie: Revisions and Extensions’

    Anshen, Ruth eds. The FamilyHarper BrothersNew York226257
    Google Scholar
  26. Merton, R.K. 1957Theory and Social StructureFree PressGlencoeGoogle Scholar
  27. May, J. eds. 1998Poverty and Inequality in South AfricaPraxis PublishingDurbanGoogle Scholar
  28. Middleton, R. 1963‘Alienation, race, and education’American Sociological Review28973977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Møller, V. 1994‘Post-election euphoria’Indicator South Africa122732Google Scholar
  30. Møller, V., Hanf, T. 1995Learning to Vote: Voter Education in the 1994 South African electionsIndicator PressDurbanGoogle Scholar
  31. Møller, V., Dickow, H., Harris, M. 1999Africa’s ‘Rainbow People’ National Pride and Happiness’Social Indicators Research47245280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Møller, V. and H. Dickow: 2001, ‘Five years into democracy: Elite and rank-and-file perspectives on South African quality of life and the ‘Rainbow Nation”, Les Cahiers de l’IFAS No. 1 (Institut Français d’Afrique du Sud, Johannesburg).Google Scholar
  33. Møller, V. and H. Dickow: 2002, ‘The role of quality of life surveys in managing change in democratic transitions: The South African Case’, in Social Indicators Research 58(1-3), pp. 267-292.Google Scholar
  34. Norris, P. and R. Mattes: 2003, ‘Does ethnicity determine support for the governing party?’, Afrobarometer Working Paper No. 26 (Afrobarometer, Cape Town).Google Scholar
  35. Orrù, M. 1987Anomie: History and MeaningsAllen & UnwinBostonGoogle Scholar
  36. Seeman, M. 1959‘On the meaning of alienation’American Sociological Review24783791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. South African Human Development Report 2003, published by the United Nations Development Programme: (December 2004)Google Scholar
  38. Srole, L. 1956‘Social integration and certain corollaries’American Sociological Review23709716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Srubar, I. 1994‘Variants of the transformation process in central Europe A comparative assessment’Zeitschrift für Soziologie23198221Google Scholar
  40. Statistics South Africa: 2001, South Africa in Transition. Selected findings from the October household survey of 1999 and changes that have occurred between 1995 and 1999 (Statistics South Africa, Pretoria).Google Scholar
  41. Vladimiriv, J., Todorov, T., Katzarski, I., Badjakov, M. 1999

    ‘Bulgaria in the circle of anomie’

    Atteslander, P.Gransow, B.Western, J. eds. Comparative Anomie Research. Hidden barriers - hidden potential for social developmentAshgateAldershot4771
    Google Scholar
  42. Western, J., Lanyon, A. 1999

    ‘Anomie in the Asia Pacific Region: The Australian study’

    Atteslander, P.Gransow, B.Western, J. eds. Comparative Anomie Research. Hidden Barriers - hidden potential for social developmentAshgateAldershot7398
    Google Scholar
  43. Wilson, R.A. 1971‘Anomie in the ghetto: A study of neighborhood type, race, and anomie’American Journal of Sociology776688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zapf, W. 2000‘Social reporting in the 1970s and the 1990s’Social Indicators Research51115CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for SociologyGerman Institute for Economic Research Berlin (DIW/SOEP) & Free University of BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Graduate School of the Social SciencesUniversity of BremenBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations