Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 75, Issue 2, pp 273–302 | Cite as

Reconsidering Social Cohesion: Developing a Definition and Analytical Framework for Empirical Research

  • Joseph Chan
  • Ho-Pong To
  • Elaine Chan
Article

Abstract

Despite its growing currency in academic and policy circles, social cohesion is a term in need of a clearer and more rigorous definition. This article provides a critical review of the ways social cohesion has been conceptualized in the literature in many cases, definitions are too loosely made, with a common confusion between the content and the causes or effects of social cohesion. This motivates us to propose a refined definition that we hope is clearer and more rigorous. We will show how our definition could be operationalized into a measurement scheme that facilitates empirical work on social cohesion.

Keywords

definition measurement operationalization social cohesion 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beauvais, C., Jenson, J. 2002‘Social cohesion: updating the state of the research’Canadian Policy Research NetworksOttawaCPRN Discussion Paper No. F|22Google Scholar
  2. Berger, P. 1998The Limits of Social Cohesion: Conflict and Mediation in Pluralist SocietiesWestviewBoulder, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  3. Berger-Schmitt, R. 2000‘Social cohesion as an aspect of the quality of societies: concept and measurement’Centre for Survey Research and MethodologyMannheimeureporting Working Paper No. 14Google Scholar
  4. Bernard, P. 2000‘Social cohesion: a dialectical critique of a quasi-concept’Strategic Research and Analysis Directorate, Department of Canadian HeritageOttawaPaper SRA-491Google Scholar
  5. Bollen, K. A., Hoyle, R. H. 2001‘Perceived cohesion: a conceptual and empirical examination’Social Forces69479504Google Scholar
  6. Canadian Council on Social Development: 2000, ‘Social cohesion in canada: possible indicators highlights’, Paper SRA-542, (Strategic Research and Analysis Directorate, Department of Canadian Heritage, Ottawa).Google Scholar
  7. Chan, J. and E. Chan: 2004,Social Cohesion without Institutional Mediation? The Case of Hong Kong, available online at the homepage of the Centre for Civil Society and Governance, the University of Hong Kong (http://web.hku.hk/∼ccsg/papers.html).Google Scholar
  8. Couch, L., Adams, J., Jones, W. 1996‘The assessment of trust orientation’Journal of Personality Assessment67305323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duhaime, G., Searles, E., Usher, P., Myers, H., Frechette, P. 2004‘Social cohesion and living conditions in the Canadian artic: from theory to measurement’Social Indicators Research66295317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feldman, T. R., Assaf, S. 1999‘Social capital: conceptual frameworks and empirical evidence: an annotated bibliography’World BankWashingtonSocial Capital Initiative Working Paper No.5Google Scholar
  11. Gough, I.Olofsson, G. eds. 1999Capitalism and Social Cohesion: Essays on Exclusion and IntegrationMacmillanBasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  12. ‘Inclusion for all: A Canadian Roadmap to Social Cohesion’, accessed on 17 June 2004 at http://canada.justice.gc.ca/en/ps/rs/rep/comsocohe.pdfGoogle Scholar
  13. Jeannotte, M. S. 2000‘Social cohesion around the world: an international comparison of definitions and issues’Strategic Research and Analysis Directorate, Department of Canadian HeritageOttawaPaper SRA-309Google Scholar
  14. Jeannotte, M. S., Stanley, D., Pendakur, R., Jamieson, B., Williams, M., Aizlewood, A. 2002‘Buying in or Dropping out: the Public Policy Implications of Social Cohesion Research’Strategic Research and Analysis Directorate, Department of Canadian HeritageOttawaPaper SRA-631Google Scholar
  15. Jenson, J. 1998‘Mapping social cohesion: the state of canadian research’Strategic Research and Analysis Directorate, Department of Canadian HeritageOttawaPaper SRA-321Google Scholar
  16. Kearns, A., Forrest, R. 2000‘Social cohesion and multilevel urban governance’Urban Studies379951071Google Scholar
  17. Lockwood, D. 1992Solidarity and Schism, ‘The problem of disorder’ in durkheimian and marxist sociologyClarendon PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  18. Lockwood, D.: 1999, ‘Civic integration and social cohesion’, in Gough and Olofsson (eds.), Capitalism and Social Cohesion, ch.4.Google Scholar
  19. Mortensen, N.: 1999, ‘Mapping system integration and social integration’, in Gough and Olofsson (eds.), Capitalism and Social Cohesion, ch.2.Google Scholar
  20. Osberg, L. 2003‘Introduction’Osberg, L. eds. The Economic Implication of Social CohesionUniversity of Toronto PressTorontoGoogle Scholar
  21. Pahl, R. E.: 1991, ‘The search for social cohesion: from durkheim to the european commission’, European Journal of Sociology xxxii, pp. 345–360.Google Scholar
  22. Putnam, R. D. 1993‘The prosperous community – social capital and public life’American Prospect133542Google Scholar
  23. Putnam, R. D. 2000Bowling Alone: the Collapse and Revival of American CommunitySimon and SchusterNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Ritzen, J., W. Easterly and M. Woolcock: 2000, ‘On “Good” Politicians and “Bad” Policies: Social Cohesion, Institutions, and Growth’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2448 (The World Bank).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Politics and Public AdministrationThe University of Hong KongPokfulamHong Kong

Personalised recommendations