Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 78, Issue 2, pp 305–326 | Cite as

Do We Need to Weight Satisfaction Scores with Importance Ratings in Measuring Quality of Life?

  • Chia-Huei Wu
  • Grace YaoEmail author
Article

Abstract

Trauer and Mackinnon (2001; Quality of life research 10, pp. 579–585) recently proposed that weighting satisfaction scores by importance ratings in measuring quality of life is undesirable and unnecessary. However, they didn’t use empirical data to support their claim. In this study, different weighting algorithms developed by Cummins (1997; Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale – Adult: Manual [Deakin, University Australia]), Raphael et al. (1996; Journal of Adolescent Health 19, pp. 366–375), Ferrans and Powers (1985; Advances in Nursing Science 8, pp. 15–24) and Frisch (1992; Comprehensive Casebook of Cognitive Therapy [Plenum Press, New York]) for measuring quality of life (QOL) were applied. Weighted scores computed from these weighting algorithms were compared with unweighted scores in predicting a global life satisfaction measure by correlation and moderated regression analyses. One hundred and thirty undergraduate students at National Taiwan University participated in the study voluntarily. They completed a 15-item questionnaire on quality of campus life developed by the authors. They also completed the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), a global life satisfaction measure developed by Diener et al. (1985; Journal of Personality Assessment 49, pp. 71–75). The correlation results revealed that the weighted scores computed from different algorithms didn’t have higher correlations to the SWLS than the unweighted scores. The moderated regression results also revealed that item importance did not moderate the relationship between item satisfaction and the overall life satisfaction. All these findings revealed that weighting satisfaction with importance is unnecessary.

Keywords

importance quality of life satisfaction weighting 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnold, H.J., Evans, M.G. 1979‘Testing multiplicative models does not require ratio scales’Organizational Behavior and Human Performance244159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrindell, W.A., Heesink, J., Feij, J.A. 1999‘The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS): Appraisal with 1700 health young adults in the Netherlands’Personality and Individual Differences26815826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arrindell, W.A., Meeuwesen, L., Huyse, F.J. 1991‘The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS): Psychometric properties in a non-psychiatric medical outpatients sample’Personality and Individual Differences12117123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atienza, F.L., Balaguer, I., Garcia-Merita, M.L. 2003‘Satisfaction with Life Scale analysis of factorial invariance across sexes’Personality and Individual Differences3512551260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bohrnstedt, G., Goldberger, A. 1969‘On the exact covariance of products of random variables’Journal of the American Statistical Association6414391442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caston, R.J., Briato, R. 1983‘On the use of facet importance as a weighting component of job satisfaction’Educational and Psychological Measurement43339350Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, J. 1978‘Partialed products are interactions: Partialed powers are curve components’Psychological Bulletin85858866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen, J., Cohen, P. 1983Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral SciencesLawrence Erlbaum AssociatesHillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  9. Cummins, R.A.: 1997, Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale – Adult: Manual (University Australia, Deakin).Google Scholar
  10. Diener, E., Emmons, R.A., Larsen, R.J., Griffin, S. 1985‘The Satisfaction with Life Scale’Journal of Personality Assessment497175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Evans, M.G. 1991‘The problem of analyzing multiplicative composites: Interactions revisited’American Psychologist46615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ewen, R.B. 1967‘Weighting components of job satisfaction’Journal of Applied Psychology516873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ferrans, C., Powers, M. 1985‘Quality of life index: development and psychometric properties’Advances in Nursing Science81524Google Scholar
  14. Frisch, M.B. 1992Use of the Quality of Life Inventory in problem assessment and treatment planning for cognitive therapy of depressionFreeman, A.Dattlio, F.M. eds. Comprehensive Casebook of Cognitive TherapyPlenum PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Glass, G.V. 1968‘Correlations with products of variables: derivations and implications for methodology’American Educational Research Journal5721728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hsieh, C.M. 2003‘Counting importance: The case of life satisfaction and relative domain importance’Social Indicators Research61227240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hsieh, C.M. 2004‘To weight or not to weight: the role of domain importance in quality of life measurement’Social Indicators Research68163174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lewis, C.A., Shevlin, M.E., Bunting, B.P., Joseph, S. 1995‘Confirmatory factor analysis of the satisfaction with life scale: replication and methodological refinement’Perceptual and Motor Skills80304306Google Scholar
  19. Locke, E.A. 1969‘What is job satisfaction?’Organizational Behavior and Human Performance4309336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Locke, E.A. 1976The nature and causes of job satisfactionDunnette, M.D. eds. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational PsychologyRand McNallyChicago12971343Google Scholar
  21. Lucas, R.E., Diener, E., Suh, E. 1996‘Discriminant validity of well-being measures’Journal of Personality and Social Psychology71616628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McGrath, C., Bedi, R. 2004‘Why are we “weighting”? An assessment of a self-weighting approach to measuring oral health-related quality of life’Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology321924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McFarlin, D.B., Coster, E.A., Rice, R.W., Coopper-Alison, T. 1995‘Facet importance and job satisfaction: Another look at the range of affect hypothesis’Basic and Applied Social Psychology16489502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McFarlin, D.B., Rice, R.W. 1992‘The role of facet importance as a moderator in job satisfaction processes’Journal of Organizational Behavior134154Google Scholar
  25. Mikes, P.S., Hulin, C.L. 1968‘Use of importance as weighting component of job satisfaction’Journal of Applied Psychology52394398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mobley, W.H., Locke, E.A. 1970‘The relationship of value importance to satisfaction’Organisational Behavior and Human Performance5463483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Neugarten, B.L., Havighurst, R.J., Tobin, S.S. 1961‘The measurement of life satisfaction’Journal of Gerontology16134143Google Scholar
  28. Pavot, W., Diener, E. 1993‘Review of the satisfaction with life scale’Psychological Assessment5164172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pavot, W., Diener, E., Colvin, C.R., Sandvik, E. 1991‘Further validation of the Satisfaction evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being’Social Indicators Research28120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Raphael, D., Rukholm, E., Brown, I., Hill-Bailey, P., Donato, E. 1996‘The quality of life profile-Adolescent version: Background, description, and initial validation’Journal of Adolescent Health19366375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rice, R.W., Gentile, D.A., McFarlin, D.B. 1991a‘Facet importance and job satisfaction’Journal of Applied Psychology763139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rice, R.W., Markus, K., Moyer, R.P., McFarlin, D.B. 1991b‘Facet importance and job satisfaction: Two experimental tests of Locke’s range of affect hypothesis’Journal of Applied Social Psychology2119771987Google Scholar
  33. Sachs, J. 2003‘Validation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in a sample of Hong Kong University students’Psychologia46225234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schmidt, F.L. 1973‘Implications of a measurement problem for expectancy theory research’Organizational Behavior and Human Performance10369368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shevlin, M.E., Brunsden, V., Miles, J.N.V. 1998‘Satisfaction with Life Scale: analysis of factorial invariance, mean structures and reliability’Personality and Individual Differences25911916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shevlin, M.E., Bunting, B.P. 1994‘Confirmatory factor analysis of the satisfaction with life scale’Perceptual and Motor Skills7913161318Google Scholar
  37. Shin, D.C., Johnson, D.M. 1978‘Avowed happiness as an overall assessment of the quality of life’Social Indicators Research5475492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Skevington, S.M., O’connell, K., the WHOQOL Group,  2004‘Can we identify the poorest quality of life? Assessing the importance of quality of life using the WHOQOL-100’Quality of Life Research132334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Staples, D.S., Higgins, C.A. 1998‘A study of the impact of factor importance weightings on job satisfaction measures’Journal of Business and Psychology13211232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Trauer, T., Mackinnon, A. 2001‘Why are we weighting? The role of importance ratings in quality of life measurement’Quality of life research10579585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Waters, L.K. 1969‘The utility of importance weights in predicting overall job satisfaction and dissatisfaction’Educational and Psychological Measurement29519522Google Scholar
  42. Waters, L.K., Roach, D. 1971‘Comparison of unweighted and importance- weighted job satisfaction measures for three samples of female office workers’Psychological Reports28779782Google Scholar
  43. Westaway, M.S., Maritz, C., Golele, N.J. 2003‘Empirical testing of the satisfaction with life scale: A South African pilot study’Psychological Reports92551554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wu, C.H. and G. Yao.: 2005, ‘Analysis of factorial invariance across genders in the Chinese version of the satisfaction with life scale’, Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  45. Yao, G., Chung, C.W., Yu, C.F., Wang, J.D. 2002‘Development and verification of reliability and validity of the WHOHR-QOL-BREF Taiwan version’Journal of the Formosan Medical Association101342351Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations