Social Indicators Research

, Volume 74, Issue 2, pp 313–325

Well-Being in an Adult Swedish Population



Objectives: The aim of this study was to see if earlier findings about factors associated with well-being could be replicated in a large population-based sample in Sweden. To the best of our knowledge, no research on well-being has been conducted on such a large population in a country, which by most standards is regarded as one of the most fortunate in the world. With its economic wealth and highly developed social welfare and health care system, Sweden is a country where the conditions for a high level of well-being would appear to be met. Methods: 10,441 randomly selected Swedish citizens, aged between 20 and 64 years, living in Stockholm County, completed a questionnaire covering issues such as demographics, social network and psychological well-being. The data were collected during the years 1998–2000. Results: Male gender, greater age, cohabiting, good childhood conditions, support from friends, sound financial situation and absence of negative life events were positively associated with well-being and explained 20% of the variance. Conclusion: The findings replicated earlier studies. Factors associated with well-being seem to remain the same, and are still explaining only a small part of the total variance, despite different measurements, time, sample sizes or country of origin. Therefore, research on well-being needs to take a new turn, by placing less focus on external factors and more focus on the internal factors, such as a person’s personality and coping strategies.


well-being population-based 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Airaksinen, E., Larsson, M., Lundberg, I., Forsell, Y. 2004‘Cognitive functions in depressive disorder: evidence from a population based study’Psychological Medicine348391CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews, F.M., McKennell, A.C. 1980‘Measures of self-reported well-being: Their affective, cognitive and other components’Social Indicators Research8127155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews, G., Henderson, S. 2000Unmet Need in Psychiatry, Problems Resources, ResponsesCambridge University pressUnited KingdomGoogle Scholar
  4. Argyle, M. 1987The Psychology of HappinessMethuenLondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Bech, P., Gudex, C., Staeher Johansen, K. 1996‘The WHO (Ten) well-being index: validation in diabetes’Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics65183190PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bell, D., Belicki, K. 1998‘A community-based study of well-being in adults reporting childhood abuse’Child Abuse and Neglect22681685CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowling, A. 1991Measuring Health. A Review of Quality of Life Measuring ScalesOpen University PressBuckinghamGoogle Scholar
  8. Cassel, J. 1976‘The contribution of the social environment to host resistance: The fourth Wade Hampton Frost Lecture’American Journal of Epidemiology104107123PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cobb, S. 1976‘Social support as a moderator of life stress’Psychosomatic Medicine38300314PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Costa, P.T., McCrae, R.R. 1980‘Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: Happy and unhappy people’Journal of Personality and Social Psychology38668678CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Diener, E. 1984‘Subjective well-being’Psychological Bulletin93542575Google Scholar
  12. Diener, E., Horwitz, J., Emmons, R.A. 1985‘Happiness of the very wealthy’Social Indicators Research16263274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diener, E., Sandvik, E., Pavot, W., Fujita, F. 1992‘Extraversion and subjective well-being in a U.S. national probability sample’Journal of Research in Psychology69205215Google Scholar
  14. Diener, E, Diener, M. 1995‘Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self esteem’Journal of Personality and Social Psychology68653663CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Diener, E., Shu, E.M., Lucas, R.E., Smith, H.L. 1999‘Subjective well-being: three decades of progress’Psychological Bulletin125276302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Furnham, A., Cheng, H. 1999‘Personality as predictor of mental health and happiness in east and west’Personality and Individual Differences27395403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gecková, A., Dijk, J.P., Steward, R., Groothhoff, J.W., Post, D. 2003‘Influence of social support on health among gender and socio-economic groups of adolescents’European Journal of Public Health134450CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Haring, M.J., Stock, W.A., Okun, M.A. 1984‘A research synthesis of gender and social class as correlates of subjective well-being’Human Relations37645657Google Scholar
  19. Haring-Hidore, M., Stock, W.A., Okun, M.A., Witter, R.A. 1985‘Marital status and subjective well-being: a research synthesis’Journal of Marriage and the Family47947953Google Scholar
  20. Headey, B., Holmstöm, E., Wearing, A. 1984‘Well-being and ill-being: Different dimensions?’Social Indicators Research14115139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Headey, B., Wearing, A. 1992Understanding happiness: A theory of subjective well-beingLongman CheshireMelbourneGoogle Scholar
  22. Hillerås, P.K., Aguero-Torres, H., Winblad, B. 2001‘Factors influencing well-being in the elderly’Current Opinion in Psychiatry14361365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jorm, A.F., Korten, A.E., Jacomb, P.A., Christensen, H., Rodger, B., Pollitt, P. 1997‘“Mental health literacy”: A survey of the public’s ability to recognize mental disorders and their beliefs about the effectiveness of treatment’Medical Journal of Australia166182186PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kyeong-Ho, Cha. 2003‘Subjective well-being among college students’Social Indicators Research62455477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Larson, R. 1978‘Thirty years of research on the subjective well-being of older Americans’Journal of Gerontology33109125PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Mastekaasa, A. 1992‘Marriage and psychological well-being: Some evidence on selection into marriage’Journal of Marriage and the Family54901911Google Scholar
  27. Myers, D.G., Diener, E. 1995‘Who is happy?’Psychological Science61015Google Scholar
  28. Okun, M.A., Stock, W.A., Haring, M.J., Witter, R.A. 1984‘Health and subjective well-being: a meta analysis’International Journal of Aging and Human Development19111132PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Okun, M.A., Stock, W.A. 1987‘Correlates and components of subjective well-being’Journal of Applied Gerontology695112Google Scholar
  30. Regier, D.A., Narrow, W.E., Rae, D.S., Manderscheid, R.W., Locke, B.Z., Goodwin, F.K. 1993‘The de facto US mental and addictive disorders service system. Epidemiologic catchment area prospective 1-year prevalence rates disorders and services’Archives of General Psychiatry508594PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Shmotkin, D. 1990‘Subjective well-being as a function of age and gender: A multivariate look for differentiated trends’Social Indicators Research23201230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stock, W. A., M. A. Okun, M. J. Haring and R. A. Witter. (1983). ‘Age differences in subjective well-being: A meta analysis’, Evaluation Studies Review Annual, pp. 279–302.Google Scholar
  33. Suh, E., Diener, E., Fujita, F. 1996‘Events and subjective well-being: Only recent events matter’Journal of Personality and Social Psychology7010911102CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Suh, E., Diener, E., Oishi, S., Triandis, H.C. 1998‘The shifting basis of life satisfaction judgments across cultures: Emotions versus norms’Journal of Personality and Social Psychology74482493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Unden, A.L., Orth-Gomér, K. 1989‘Development of a social support instrument for use in population surveys’Social Science and Medicine2913871392CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna Hansson
    • 1
  • Pernilla Hillerås
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Yvonne Forsell
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Social Medicine Norrbacka plan 2Karolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Stockholm Gerontology Research CenterStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Department of NEUROTECKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
  4. 4.Sophiahemmet University CollegeStockholmSweden
  5. 5.Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Social MedicineKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations