Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 72, Issue 2, pp 121–152 | Cite as

Testing a Moderated Model of Satisfaction with Urban Living using Data for Brisbane-South East Queensland, Australia

  • Rod MccreaEmail author
  • Robert Stimson
  • John Western
Article

Abstract

Using survey data collected from households living in the Brisbane-South East Queensland region, a rapidly growing metropolis in Australia, path analysis is used to test links between urban residents’ assessment of various urban attributes and their level of satisfaction in three urban domains-housing, neighbourhood or local area, and the wider metropolitan region – moderated by selected demographic characteristics of respondents. The analysis also shows the relative contribution of those urban domains to overall life satisfaction. Neighbourhood satisfaction is shown to be much less important in predicting overall life satisfaction than is satisfaction with housing and the region. However, neighbourhood satisfaction impacts indirectly on overall life satisfaction, mediated by regional satisfaction and housing satisfaction. In predicting regional satisfaction, the cost of living and government service provision are shown to be most important, with pollution important for younger people and parents, while improvements to transport systems are more important for the baby boomer generation. Neighbourhood satisfaction is best predicted by neighbourhood interaction and perceived crime, with neighbourhood interaction being more important for older people, while perceived crime is more important for younger and single people. Access to facilities is a poor predictor of neighbourhood satisfaction, except for parents. Satisfaction with housing is shown to be best predicted by housing age, temperature and home ownership. However, larger homes are important for parents, while young people prefer smaller homes. The importance of various urban attributes does not vary between genders. While material concerns like the cost of living and the provision of services are shown to be primary factors underlying overall satisfaction with urban living, the importance of environmental issues and demand for smaller homes might be expected to increase over time.

Keywords

community satisfaction housing satisfaction life satisfaction neighbourhood satisfaction path analysis perception quality of life regional satisfaction survey research 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Audirac, I., Shermyen, A. H, Smith, M. T 1990’Ideal urban form and visions of the good life - Florida growth management dilemma’Journal of the American Planning Association56470482Google Scholar
  2. Baldassare, M., Wilson, G. 1995’More trouble in paradise - urbanization and the decline in suburban quality-of-life ratings’Urban Affairs Review30690708Google Scholar
  3. Boyer, R., Savageau, D. 1981Places Rated AlmanacRand McNallyChicagoGoogle Scholar
  4. Brotchie, J., Newton, P., Hall, P., Nukamp, P. 1985The Future of Urban FormCoom, Helm and NicholsLondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruin, M.J, Cook, C.C 1997’Understanding constraints and residential satisfaction among low-income single-parent families’Environment and Behavior29532553Google Scholar
  6. Campbell, A., Converse, P., Rodgers, W. 1976The Quality of American Life: Perceptions, Evaluations and SatisfactionsRussell Sage FoundationNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Cicerchia, A. 1999’Measures of optimal centrality: indicators of city effect and urban overloading’Social Indicators Research46273299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diener, E. 1984’Subjective well-being’Psychological Bulletin,95542575Google Scholar
  9. Glaeser, E., Kolko, J., Saiz, A. 2000’Consumer city’, Working Paper 7790National Bureau of Economic ResearchCambridge, MA, USAGoogle Scholar
  10. Grayson, L., Young, K. 1994Quality of Life in CitiesBritish LibraryLondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Greenberg, M., Schneider, D., Choi, D.W 1994’Neighborhood quality’Geographical Review84115Google Scholar
  12. Gyourko, J., Tracy, J. 1991’The structure of local public-finance and the quality-of-life’Journal of Political Economy99774806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hsieh, C. 2003’Counting importance: the case of life satisfaction and relative domain importance’Social Indicators Research (61227240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jeffres, L.W, Dobos, J. 1995’Separating peoples satisfaction with life and public perceptions of the quality-of-life in the environment’Social Indicators Research34181211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Joreskog, K., Sorbom, D. 1996LISREL8: User’s Reference Guide ScientificSoftware InternationalChicagoGoogle Scholar
  16. Kahneman, D.: 1999, ‘Objective happiness’, in D. Kahneman, E. Diener and N. Schawrz (eds.), Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
  17. Keeble, D. 1990’Small firms, new firms, and uneven regional development in the United Kingdom’Area22234245Google Scholar
  18. Lance C., E., Mallard, A.G, Michalos, A.C 1995’Tests of the causal directions of global life facet satisfaction relationships’Social Indicators Research346992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ley, D. 1996The New Middle Class and the Remaking of the Central CityOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. Liaw K., L., Frey, W.H, Lin, J.P 2002’Location of adult children as an attraction for black and white elderly primary migrants in the United States’Environment and Planning A34191216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lu, M. 1999’Determinants of residential satisfaction: ordered logit vs. regression models’Growth and Change30264287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marans, R. W.: 2000, ‘Measuring the quality of community life: A program for longitudinal and comparative international research’, The Second International Conference on Quality of Life in Cities’, Singapore.Google Scholar
  23. Marans, R. W.: 2002, ‘Detroit area study: presentations and selected findings’, http://www.tcaup.umich.edu/workfolio/DAS2001/findings/WebDistributionby Cty.html.Google Scholar
  24. Marans, R. W. and W. Rodgers: 1975, ‘Toward an understanding of community satisfaction’, in A. Hawley and V. Rock (eds.), Metropolitan America in Contemporary Perspective (Halsted Press, New York).Google Scholar
  25. Michalos A., C. 1985’Multiple discrepancies theory (MDT)’Social Indicators Research16347413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Michalos A., C., Zumbo, B.D 1999’Public services and the quality of life’Social Indicators Research48125156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Parkes, A., Kearns, A., Atkinson, R. 2002’What makes people dissatisfied with their neighbourhoods?’Urban Studies3924132438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pierce R., M. 1985’Rating America’s metropolitan areas’American Demographics72025Google Scholar
  29. Rogerson, R. 1999’Quality of life and city competitiveness’Urban Studies36319328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schwarz, N. and F. Strack: 1999, ‘Reports of subjective well-being: judgmental processes and their methodological implications’, in D. Kahneman, E. Diener and N. Schawrz (eds.), Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
  31. Schwarz, N., Strack, F., Kommer, D., Wagner, D. 1989’Soccer, rooms, and the quality of your life: Mood effects on judgments of satisfaction with life in general and with specific domains’European Journal of Social Psychology176979Google Scholar
  32. Sirgy M., J., Cornwell, T. 2001’Further validation of the Sirgy et al.’s measure of community quality of life’Social Indicators Research56125143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sirgy M., J., Cornwell, T. 2002’How neighborhood features affect quality of life’Social Indicators Research5979114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sirgy M., J., Rahtz, D., Cicic, M., Underwood, R. 2000’A method for assessing residents’ satisfaction with community-based services: A quality-of-life perspective’Social Indicators Research49279316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Taylor R., B. 1995’The impact of crime on communities’Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science5392845Google Scholar
  36. TurkseverA. N., E., Atalik, G. 2001’Possibilities and limitations for the measurement of the quality of life in urban areas’Social Indicators Research53163197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Warr, P. B. 1987Work, Unemployment, and Mental HealthOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  38. Warr, P. B.: 1999, ‘Well-being and the workplace’, in D. Kahneman, E. Diener and N. Schawrz (eds.), Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Research into Sustainable Urban and and Regional Futures, School of Geography Planning and ArchitectureUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.Social Research Centre, School of Social ScienceUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations