Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica

, Volume 60, Issue 2, pp 297–315 | Cite as

Magnetic particles in indoor dust as marker of pollution emitted by different outside sources

Article
First Online:
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:

Abstract

The potential relation between outdoor pollutants and the quality of indoor air was evaluated. A case study was carried out in the small town of Zyrardow situated south-west of Warsaw, Poland. The indoor dust from 20 apartments from several parts of the town that are anticipated to be exposed to various levels of pollution was investigated: a mildly polluted area (suburban), a heating plant area, a post-industrial area and the city center. For evaluation of indoor dust several magnetic parameters (mass-specific magnetic susceptibility χ, its temperature dependence, anhysteretic remanent magnetization, hysteresis loop parameters) were applied. Analysis of magnetic properties was supplemented by analysis of chemical elements: Cd, Cu, Co, Cr, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb and Zn. Depending on the location of apartments, large variations in concentration, mineralogy and grain-size of magnetic particles were detected. The thermomagnetic analysis revealed magnetite as a primary magnetic phase. In indoor dust, the Curie temperature of ~760°C and soft hysteresis loops with relatively low coercivity values of ~1.5-5 mT are an attribute of metallic iron. The dust collected from apartments located near the local heating plant area, in contaminated post-industrial and suburban areas contains mainly magnetite and only a small amount of metallic iron. Mass-specific magnetic susceptibility is in the range from 40 to 200 × 10-8 m3kg-1 and linearly correlates with concentration of individual heavy metals: Ni, Cr, Co and Zn. Magnetic fraction of dust from the city center mainly consists of magnetite and variable amounts of metallic iron. Magnetic susceptibility shows linear correlations with concentration of Fe and concentration of individual heavy metals (Zn, Ni and Co) considered as traffic-related. The study demonstrates that metallic iron present in indoor dust is a potential marker of trafficrelated sources and it makes it possible to use magnetic methods as a tool for evaluation of traffic-related impact on indoor air levels.

Keywords

indoor dust indoor air pollution magnetic susceptibility metallic iron heavy metals 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bućko M.S., Magiera T., Pesonen L.J. and Janus B., 2009. Magnetic, geochemical, and microstructural characteristics of road dust on roadsides with different traffic volumes — case study from Finland. Water Air Soil Pollut., 209, 295–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Castaneda-Miranda A.G., Böhnel H.N., Molina-Garza R.S. and Chaparro M.A.E. 2014. Magnetic evaluation of TSP-filters for air quality monitoring. Atmos. Environ., 96, 163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chao C.Y.H., 2001. Comparison between indoor and outdoor air contaminant levels in residential buildings from passive sampler study. Build. Environ., 36, 999–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Day R., Fuller M. and Schmidt A., 1977. Hysteresis properties of titanomagnetite: Grain size and composition dependence. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 13, 260–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dennekamp M., Howarth S., Dick C.W., Cherrie J., Donaldson K. and Sea A., 2001. Ultrafine particles and nitrogen oxides generated by gas and electric cooking. Occup. Environ. Med., 58, 511–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Englert N., 2004. Fine particles and human health — A review of epidemio-logical studies. Toxicol. Lett., 149, 235–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Evans M.E. and Heller F., 2003. Environmental Magnetism: Principles and Applications of Enviromagnetics. Elsevier Science, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  8. Fuller C., Davis J., Cain D., Lamothe P., Fries T., Fernandez G., Vargas J. and Murillo M., 1990. Distribution and transport of sediment bound metal contaminants in the Rio Grande de Tracole, Costa Rica (Central America). Water Res., 24, 805–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Górka-Kostrubiec B., 2015. The magnetic properties of indoor dust fractions as markers of air pollution inside buildings. Build. Environ., 90, 186–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Górka-Kostrubiec B., Jeleńska M. and Król E., 2014. Magnetic signature of indoor air pollution: household dust study. Acta Geophys., 62, 1478–1503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guo H., Morawska L., He C., Zhang Y., Ayoko G. and Cao M., 2010. Characterization of particle number concentrations and PM2.5 in a school: influence of outdoor air pollution on indoor air. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 17, 1268–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Halsall C.J., Maher B.A., Karloukovski V.V., Shah P. and Watkins S.J., 2008. A novel approach to investigating indoor/outdoor pollution links: Combined magnetic and PAH measurements. Atmos. Environ., 42, 8902–8909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. He C., Morawska L., Hitchins J. and Gilbert D., 2004. Contribution from indoor sources to particle number and mass concentrations in residential houses. Atmos. Environ., 38, 3405–3415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hrouda F., 2011. Models of frequency-dependent susceptibility of rocks and soils revisited and broadened. Geophys. J. Int., 187, 1259–1269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jamriska M., Morawska L. and Clark B.A., 2000. Effect of ventilation and filtration on submicrometer particles in an indoor environment. Indoor Air, 10, 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jelenska M., Hasso-Agopsowicz A., Kadzialko-Hofmokl M., Kopcewicz B., Sukhorada A., Bondar K. and Matviishina Zh., 2008. Magnetic structure of the polluted soil profiles from eastern Ukraine. Acta Geophys., 56, 1043–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jordanova D., Jordanova N., Lanos Ph., Petrov P. and Tsacheva T., 2012. Magnetism of outdoor and indoor settled dust and its utilization as a tool for revealing the effect of elevated particulate air pollution on cardiovascular mortality. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 13, Q08Z49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jordanova N., Jordanova D., Henry B., Goff M.L., Dimov D. and Tsacheva T., 2006. Magnetism of cigarette ashes. J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 301, 50–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kingham S., Briggs D., Elliott P., Fischer P. and Lebret E., 2000. Spatial variations in the concentrations of traffic-related pollutants in indoor and outdoor air in Huddersfield, England. Atmos. Environ., 34, 905–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kulmala M., Asmi A. and Petaja T., 1999. Indoor air aerosol model: the effect of outdoor air, filtration and ventilation on indoor concentrations. Atmos. Environ., 33, 2133–2144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Langer S., Weschler C.J., Fischer A., Beko G., Toftum J. and Clausen G., 2010. Phthalate and PAH concentrations in dust collected from 500 Danish homes and 151 Danish day-care facilities. Atmos. Environ., 44, 2294–2301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Layton D.W. and Beamer P.I., 2009. Migration of contaminated soil and airborne particulates to indoor dust. Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 8199–8205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lim M.C.H., Ayodo G.A., Morawska L., Ristovski Z.D. and Jayaratne, E.R., 2007. The effects of fuel characteristics and engine operating conditions on the elemental composition of emissions from duty diesel buses. Fuel, 86, 1831–1839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Magiera T., Jablonska M., Strzyszcz Z. and Rachwal M., 2011. Morphological and mineralogicalforms of technogenic magnetic particles in industrial dust. Atmos. Environ., 45, 4281–4290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Martuzevicius D., Grinshpun S.A., Lee T., Hu S., Biswas P., Reponene T. and Lemaster G., 2008. Traffic-related PM2.5 aerosol in residential houses located near major highways: indoor versus outdoor concentrations. Atmos. Environ., 42, 6575–6585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mitchell R., Maher B.A. and Kinnersley R., 2010. Rates of particulate pollution deposition onto leaf surfaces: Temporal and inter-species magnetic analyses. Environ. Pollut., 158, 1472–1478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Monaci F., Moni F., Lanciotti E., Grechi D. and Bargagli R., 2000. Biomonitoring of airborne metals in urban environments: new tracers of vehicle emission, in place of lead. Environ. Pollut., 107, 321–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mosleh M, Blau P.J and Dumitrescu D., 2004. Characteristics and morphology of wear particles from laboratory testing of disk brake materials. Wear, 256, 1128–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Muxworthy A.R., Schmidbauer E. and Petersen N., 2002. Magnetic properties and Mössbauer spectra of urban atmospheric particulate matter: a case study fromMunich. Germany. Geophys. J. Int., 150, 558–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Parafiniuk J., Bojakowska I. and Malecka K., 2005. Process of auto-purification of Pisia river-bed (Western Mazovia) based on changes of selected heavy metals contents. Przeglad Geologiczny, 53, 609–614 (in Polish).Google Scholar
  31. Qiao Q., Zhang Ch., Huang B. and Piper J.D.A., 2011. Evaluating the environmental quality impact of the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games: magnetic monitoring of street dust in Beijing Olympic Park. Geophys. J. Int., 187, 1222–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sagnotti L., Macri P., Egli R. and Mondino M., 2006. Magnetic properties of atmospheric particulate matter from automatic air sampler stations in Latinum (Italy): Toward a definition of magnetic fingerprints for natural and anthropogenic PM10 sources. J. Geophys. Res., 111, B12S22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sagnotti L., Taddeucci J., Winkler A. and Cavallo A., 2009. Compositional, morphological, and hysteresis characterization of magnetic airborne particulate matter in Rome, Italy. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 10, Q08Z06.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Salo H., Bucko M.S., Vaahtovuo E., Limo J., Mäkinen J. and Pesonen L.J., 2012. Biomonitoring of air pollution in SWFinland by magnetic and chemical measurements of moss bags and lichens. J. Geochem. Explor., 115, 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. See S.W. and Balasubramanian R., 2006. Physical characteristics of ultrafine particles emitted from different gas cooking methods. Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 6, 82–92.Google Scholar
  36. Tauxe L., 2015. Essentials of Paleomagnetism. Third Web Edition (http://earthref.org/MAGIC/books/Tauxe/Essentials/).Google Scholar
  37. Thorpe A. and Harrison R.M., 2008. Sources and properties of non-exhaust particulate matter from road traffic: a review. Sci. Tot. Environ., 400, 270–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tomlinson D.C., Wilson J.G., Harris C.R. and Jeffrey D.W., 1980. Problems in assessment of heavy metals in estuaries and the formation of a pollution index. Helgoländer Meeresunlters, 33, 566–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wahlin P., Berkowicz R. and Palmgren F., 2006. Characterisation of traffic-generated particulate matter in Copenhagen. Atmos. Environ., 40, 2151–2159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wan M.P., Wu Ch. L., To G.N.S., Chan T.Ch. and Chao C.Y.H., 2011. Ultrafine particles, and PM2.5 generated from cooking in homes. Atmos. Environ., 45, 6141–6148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang G., Oldfield F., Xia D., Chen F., Liu X. and Zhang W., 2012. Magnetic properties and correlation with heavy metals in urban street dust: A case study from the city of Lanzhou, China. Atmos. Environ., 46, 289–298.Google Scholar
  42. Zhang C.Q., Appel E. and Huanga B., 2012. Discriminating sources of anthropogenic heavy metals in urban street dusts using magnetic and chemical methods. J. Geochem. Explor., 119-120, 60–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhang Q., Gangupomu R.H., Ramirez D. and Zhu Y., 2010. Measurement of ultrafine particles and other air pollutants emitted by cooking activities. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health, 7, 1744–1759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zheng Y. and Zhang S.H., 2008. Magnetic properties of street dust and topsoil in Beijing and its environmental implications. Chin. Sci. Bull., 53, 408–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhu Z., Han Z., Bi X. and Yang W., 2012. The relationship between magnetic parameters and heavy metal contents of indoor dust in e-waste recycling impacted area, Southeast China. Sci. Tot. Environ., 433, 302–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhu Z., Li Z., Bi X., Han Z. and Yu G., 2013. Response of magnetic properties to heavy metal pollution in dust from three industrial cities in China. J. Hazard. Mater., 246-247, 189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yang Q., Chen H. and Li B., 2015. Source identification and health risk assessment of metals in indoor dust in the vicinity of phosphorus mining, Guizhou Province, China. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 68, 20–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Geophysics of the ASCR, v.v.i 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Geophysics Polish Academy of SciencesWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations