Role of single-domain magnetic particles in creation of inverse magnetic fabrics in volcanic rocks: A mathematical model study
- 79 Downloads
The role of single-domain (SD) magnetic particles in creation of inverse magnetic fabrics is investigated on simple mathematical models using a realistic estimate for SD intrinsic susceptibility. In contrast to the fraction created by multi-domain (MD) particles, in which the anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) is controlled by both the grain AMS and intensity of the preferred orientation of the particles, the AMS of the SD fraction is controlled solely by the intensity of the preferred orientation. The degree of AMS of ensemble of SD grains with a preferred orientation is therefore much higher than that of the same ensemble of MD particles implying the existence of frequent inverse magnetic fabrics. However, the occurrence of inverse magnetic fabrics due to SD particles is more the exception than the rule. Consequently, the amounts of SD particles is probably in general low. Nevertheless, the presence of SD particles in amounts insufficient to create inverse magnetic fabrics may diminish the whole rock AMS substantially. This can be one of the reasons for relatively low AMS in volcanic rocks whose magnetic particles may be really small obeying the conditions for the existence of SD particles.
KeywordsAMS of SD magnetic particles inverse magnetic fabric volcanic rocks
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Cañon-Tapia E., 2004. Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility of lava flows and dykes: A historical account. In: Martin-Hernandez F., Luneburg C.M., Aubourg C. and Jackson M. (Eds), Magnetic Fabric: Methods and Applications. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 238, 205–225.Google Scholar
- Graham J.W., 1966. Significance of magnetic anisotropy in Appalachian sedimentary rocks. In: Steinhart J.S. and Smith T.J. (Eds), The Earth beneath the Continents. Geophysical Monograph Series, 10, American geophysical Union, Washington, D.C., 627–648.Google Scholar
- Grégoire V., de Saint Blanquat M., Nedelec A. and Bouchez J.-L., 1996. Shape anisotropy versus magnetic interactions of magnetic grains: experiments and application to AMS in granitic rocks. Geophys. Res. Lett., 18, 2193–2196.Google Scholar
- Hartstra R.L., 1982. Grain-size dependence of initial susceptibility and saturation magnetizationrelated parameters of four natural magnetites in the PSD-MD range. Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 761, 447–495.Google Scholar
- Hrouda F., Melka R. and Schulmann K., 1994. Periodical changes in fabric intensity during simple shear deformation and its implications for magnetic susceptibility anisotropy of sedimentary and volcanic rocks. Acta Univ. Carol. Geol., 38, 37–56.Google Scholar
- Janák F., 1977. The determination of the content of ferromagnetic minerals in rock sample. Sborník geologických věd (J. Geol. Sci.), 14, 153–164.Google Scholar
- Nagata T., 1961. Rock Magnetism. Maruzen, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
- Scheidegger A.E., 1965. On the statistics of the orientation of bedding planes, grain axes, and similar sedimentological data. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap., 525-C, 164–167.Google Scholar
- Stacey F.D. and Benerjee S.K., 1974. The Physical Principles of Rock Magnetism. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 195 pp.Google Scholar
- Tarling D.H. and Hrouda F. 1993. The Magnetic Anisotropy of Rocks. Chapman & Hall, London, U.K., 217 pp.Google Scholar