Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica

, Volume 58, Issue 1, pp 76–83 | Cite as

Kamchatka subduction zone, May 2013: the Mw 8.3 deep earthquake, preceding shallow swarm and numerous deep aftershocks

  • Aleš ŠpičákEmail author
  • Jiří Vaněk


A sequence of 98 teleseismically recorded earthquakes occurred off the east coast of Kamchatka at depths between 10-90 km around latitude 52.5°N and longitude 160°E on May 16–23, 2013. The swarm occurred along the northern limit of the rupture area of the 1952 Mw 9.0 great Kamchatka earthquake, the fifth largest earthquake in the history of seismic observations. On May 24, 2013 the strongest deep earthquake ever recorded of Mw 8.3 occurred beneath the Sea of Okhotsk at a depth of 610 km in the Pacific slab of the Kamchatka subduction zone, becoming the northernmost deep earthquake in the region. The deep Mw 8.3 earthquake occurred down-dip of the shallow swarm in a transition zone between the southern deep and northern shallow segments of the Pacific slab. Several deep aftershocks followed, covering a large, laterally elongated part of the slab. We suppose that the two described earthquake sequences, the May 16–23 shallow earthquake swarm and the May 24–28 deep mainshock-aftershock series, represent a single tectonic event in the Pacific slab having distinct properties at different depth levels. A low-angle underthrusting of the shallow part of the slab recorded by the shallow earthquake swarm activated the deep part; this process induced the deep mainshock-aftershock series only three days after the swarm. The domain of the subducting slab activated by the May 2013 earthquake occurrence was extraordinarily large both down-dip and along-strike.


Kamchatka deep earthquake earthquake swarm Wadati-Benioff zone 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bird P., 2003. An updated digital model of plate boundaries. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 4, 1027, DOI:  10.1029/2001GC000252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Engdahl E.R., van der Hilst R.D. and Buland R., 1998. Global teleseismic earthquake relocation with improved travel times and procedures for depth determination. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., 88, 722–743.Google Scholar
  3. Gorbatov A., Kostoglodov V. and Suárez G., 1997. Seismicity and structure of the Kamchatka subduction zone. J. Geophys. Res., 102, 17883–17898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gorbatov A., Widiyantoro S., Fukao Y. and Gordeev E., 2000. Signature of remnant slabs in the North Pacific from P-wave tomography. Geophys. J. Int., 142, 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hanuš V. and Vaněk J., 1984. Earthquake distribution and volcanism in Kamchatka, Kurile Islands, and Hokkaido. Part 1: Kamchatka and Northern Kuriles. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 28, 36–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jiang G., Zhao D. and Zhang G., 2009. Seismic tomography of the Pacific slab under Kamchatka. Tectonophysics, 465, 190–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Johnson J.M. and Satake K., 1999. Asperity distribution of the 1952 great Kamchatka earthquake and its relation to future earthquake potential in Kamchatka. Pure Appl. Geophys., 154, 541–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kepezhinskas P., McDermott F., Defant M.J., Hochstaedter A., Drummond M.S., Hawkesworth C.J., Koloskov A., Maury R. and Bellon H., 1997. Trace element and Sr-Nd-Pb isotopic constraints on a three-component model of Kamchatka Arc petrogenesis. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 61, 577–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Levin V., Shapiro N., Park J. and Ritzwoller M., 2002. Seismic evidence for catastrophic slab loss beneath Kamchatka. Nature, 418, 763–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. MacInnes B.T., Weiss R., Bourgeois J. and Pinegina T.K., 2010. Slip distribution of the 1952 Kamchatka great earthquake based on near-field tsunami deposits and historical records. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., 100, 1695–1709, DOI:  10.1785/0120090376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ogorodov N.V., Kozhemiaka N.N., Vazheevskaia A.A. and Ogorodova A.S., 1972. Vulkany i četvertičnyj vulkanizm Sredinnogo khrebta Kamchatki (Volcanoes and Quaternary Volcanism of the Kamchatka Middle Ridge). Nauka, Moscow, Russia.Google Scholar
  12. Park J., Levin V., Brandon M., Lees J., Peyton V., Gordeev E. and Ozerov A., 2002. A dangling slab, amplified arc volcanism, mantle flow and seismic anisotropy in the Kamchatka plate corner. In: Stein S. and Freymueller J.T. (Eds.), Plate Boundary Zones, Geodynamic Series 30, AGU, Washington, D.C., 295–324.Google Scholar
  13. Portnyagin M., Hoernle K., Avdeiko G., Hauff F., Werner R., Bindenman I, Uspensky V. and Garbe-Schoberg D., 2005. Transition from arc to oceanic magmatism at the Kamchatka-Aleutian junction. Geology, 33, 25–28, DOI:  10.1130/G20853.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ryan W.B.F., Carbotte S.M., Coplan J.O., O’Hara S., Melkonian A., Arko R., Weissel R.A., Ferrini V., Goodwillie A., Nitsche F., Bonczkowski J. and Zemsky R., 2009. Global Multi-Resolution Topography synthesis. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 10, Q03014, DOI: 10.1029/2008GC002332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Shapiro M.N. and Solovev A.V., 2011. Cenozoic volcanic rocks of North Kamchatka: in search of subduction zones. Geotectonics, 45, 210–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Špičák A., Vaněk J. and Hanu. V., 2009. Volcanic plumbing system and seismically active column in the volcanic arc of the Izu-Bonin subduction zone. Geophys. J. Int., 179, 1301–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Zobin V.M. and Ivanova E.I., 1994. Earthquake swarms in the Kamchatka-Commander Region. Geophys. J. Int., 117, 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Geophysics of the ASCR, v.v.i 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of GeophysicsAcademy of Sciences of the Czech RepublicPraha 4Czech Republic

Personalised recommendations