Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica

, Volume 57, Issue 4, pp 543–564 | Cite as

Analyses of primary remanence vector data from a large collection of lava flows: towards improved methodology in paleo-geomagnetism

  • Leo KristjanssonEmail author


Research into the properties of past geomagnetic fields (paleo-geomagnetism) has been carried out worldwide for over half a century. This research utilizes rocks which are to a varying degree inadequate for that purpose, and evaluation of the results is therefore not always on firm ground. One resource which can be utilized to constrain several aspects of the interpretation of other paleo-geomagnetic data, consists of stable primary remanence vectors in large homogeneous collections of dated fresh lava flows. We outline how the available remanence data from several thousand lavas in Iceland may be analysed in a semi-quantitative way to test some of current results, methodology and concepts of paleo-geomagnetism. Among topics where such analysis provides new insights, are the geomagnetic polarity time scale, the frequency distribution of virtual geomagnetic poles in latitude and longitude, and the relative intensity of the magnetic field as a function of virtual pole latitude. Comparison of the scatter in remanence intensities and in absolute paleointensity determinations on Icelandic lavas indicates, along with other evidence, that quality criteria for the latter are in need of revising. It is also confirmed here that long-term changes have occurred in the amplitude of the geomagnetic secular variation; they should be taken into account in studies on other properties of the paleo-geomagnetic field.


paleomagnetism Iceland Neogene secular variation paleointensity 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abrahamsen N., 1992. On farsidedness of palaeomagnetic poles: magnetic refraction, sediment compaction and dipole off-set. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 36, 26–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arason P. and Levi S., 2010. Maximum likelihood solution for inclination-only data in paleomagnetism. Geophys. J. Int., 182, 753–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biggin A.J., 2010. Are systematic differences between thermal and microwave Thellier-type palaeointensity estimates a consequence of multidomain bias in the thermal results? Phys. Earth. Planet. Inter., 180, 16–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biggin A.J., Paterson G.A. and Hurst E., 2012. PINT and the path to perfect palaeointensity. American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2012, Poster GP31A-1065 ( Scholar
  5. Bleil U., Hall J.M., Johnson H.P., Levi S. and Schönharting G., 1982. The natural magnetization of a 3-kilometer section of Icelandic crust. J. Geophys. Res., 87, 6569–6589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Camps P. and Prévot M., 1996. A statistical model of the fluctuations in the geomagnetic field from paleosecular variation to reversal. Science, 273, 776–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Camps P., Henry M., Nicolaysen K. and Plenier G., 2007. Statistical properties of paleomagnetic directions in Kerguelen lava flows: implications for the late Oligocene paleomagnetic field. J. Geophys. Res., 112, B06102, DOI: 10.1029/2006JB004648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Camps P., Singer B.S., Carvallo C., Goguitchaichvili A., Fanjat G. and Allen B., 2011. The Kamikatsura event and the Matuyama-Brunhes reversal recorded in lavas from Tjörnes peninsula, Northern Iceland. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 310, 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cox A., 1971. Confidence limits for the precision parameter k. Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 18, 545–549.Google Scholar
  10. Dagley P. and Wilson R.L., 1971. Geomagnetic field reversals — a link between strength and orientation of a dipole source. Nature, 232, 16–18.Google Scholar
  11. Dagley P., Wilson R.L., Ade-Hall J.M., Walker G.P.L., Haggerty S.E., Sigurgeirsson T., Watkins N.D., Smith P.J., Edwards J. and Grasty R.L., 1967. Geomagnetic polarity zones for Icelandic lavas. Nature, 216, 25–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fisher R.A., 1953. Dispersion on a sphere. Proc. R. Soc. London, A217, 295–305.Google Scholar
  13. Gee J. and Kent D.V., 2007. Source of oceanic magnetic anomalies and the geomagnetic polarity timescale. In: Kono M. (Ed.), Geomagnetism. Treatise on Geophysics, 5, 455–507, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harrison C.G.A., 1980. Secular variation and excursions of the Earth’s magnetic field. J. Geophys. Res., 85, 3511–3522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heirtzler J.R., Dickson G.O., Herron E.M., Pitman W.C. and LePichon X., 1968. Marine magnetic anomalies, geomagnetic field reversals, and motions of the ocean floor and continents. J. Geophys. Res., 73, 2119–2136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoffman K.A., 1992. Dipolar reversal states of the geomagnetic field and core-mantle dynamics. Nature, 359, 789–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson C.L., Constable C.G., Tauxe L., Barendregt R., Brown L.L., Coe R.S., Layer P., Meija V., Opdyke N.D., Singer B.S., Staudigel H. and Stone D.B., 2008. Recent investigations of the 0–5 Ma geomagnetic field recorded by lava flows. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 9, Q04032, DOI: 10.1029/2007GC001696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kristjansson L., 1985a. Some statistical properties of palaeomagnetic directions in Icelandic lava flows. Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 80, 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kristjansson L., 1985b. On “The relationship between the magnitude and direction of the geomagnetic field during the late Tertiary in Eastern Iceland? by Roberts N. and Shaw J.. Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 80, 555–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kristjansson L., 1995. New paleomagnetic results from Icelandic Neogene lavas. Geophys. J. Int., 121, 435–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kristjansson L., 1999. On low-latitude virtual geomagnetic poles in Icelandic basalt lava sequences. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 115, 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kristjansson L., 2002. Estimating properties of the paleomagnetic field from Icelandic lavas. Phys. Chem. Earth, 27, 1205–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kristjansson L., 2008. Paleomagnetic research on Icelandic lava flows. Jökull, 58, 101–116 (online at Scholar
  24. Kristjansson L. and McDougall I., 1982. Some aspects of the late Tertiary geomagnetic field in Iceland. Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 68, 273–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kristjansson L. and Johannesson H., 1989. Variable dispersion of Neogene geomagnetic field directions in Iceland. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 115, 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kristjansson L. and Johannesson H., 1996. Stratigraphy and paleomagnetism of the lava pile south of Isafjardardjup, NW-Iceland. Jökull, 44, 3–16.Google Scholar
  27. Kristjansson L. and Johannesson H., 1999. Secular variation and reversals in a composite 2.5 km thick lava section in central Western Iceland. Earth Planets Space, 51, 261–276.Google Scholar
  28. Kristjansson L. and Audunsson H., 2007. Um segulstefnu i hraunlögum og ovissu i tulkun hennar (On uncertainties in the interpretation of paleomagnetic directions). Raust, 4, 17–25 (in Icelandic, with English summary).Google Scholar
  29. Kristjansson L. and Jonsson G., 2007. Palaeomagnetism and magnetic anomalies in Iceland. J. Geodyn., 43, 30–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kristjansson L., Hardarson B.S. and Audunsson H., 2003. A detailed paleaeomagnetic study of the oldest (∼ 15 Myr) lava sequences in Northwest Iceland. Geophys. J. Int., 155, 991–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Laj C., Mazaud A., Weeks R., Fuller M. and Herrero-Bervera E., 1991. Geomagnetic reversal paths. Nature, 351, 447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Langereis C.G., van Hoof A.A.M. and Rochette P., 1992. Longitudinal confinement of geomagnetic reversal paths as a possible sedimentary artefact. Nature, 358, 226–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McDougall I., Saemundsson K., Johannesson H., Watkins N.D. and Kristjansson L., 1977. Extension of the geomagnetic polarity time scale to 6.5 m.y.: K-Ar dating, geological and paleomagnetic study of a 3,500 m lava succession in western Iceland. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 88, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McDougall I., Kristjansson L. and Saemundsson K., 1984. Magnetostratigraphy and geochronology of Northwest Iceland. J. Geophys. Res., 89, 7029–7060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McElhinny M.W. and McFadden P.L., 1997. Palaeosecular variation over the past 5 Myr based on a new generalized database. Geophys. J. Int., 131, 240–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McFadden P.L. and Merrill R.T., 2000. Evolution of the geomagnetic reversal rate since 160 Ma: is the process continuous? J. Geophys. Res., 105, 28455–28460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moorbath S., Sigurdsson H. and Goodwin R., 1968. K-Ar ages of the oldest exposed rocks in Iceland. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 4, 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ogg J.G., 2012. Geomagnetic polarity time scale. In: Gradstein F.M., Ogg J.G., Schmitz M.D. and Ogg G.M. (Eds.), The Geologic Time Scale 2012. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 85–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Onstott T., 1980. Application of the Bingham distribution function in paleomagnetic studies. J. Geophys. Res., 85, 1500–1510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Prévot M. and Camps P., 1993. Absence of preferred longitude sectors for poles from volcanic records of geomagnetic reversals. Nature, 366, 53–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith P.J., 1967. The intensity of the Tertiary geomagnetic field. Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 12, 239–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tauxe L., 2010. Essentials of Paleomagnetism. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  43. Tauxe L. and Yamazaki T., 2007. Paleointensities. In: Kono M. (Ed.), Geomagnetism. Treatise on Geophysics, 5, 509–563. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Valet J.-P., Tucholka P., Courtillot V. and Meynadier L., 1992. Palaeomagnetic constraints on the geometry of the geomagnetic field during reversals. Nature, 356, 400–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Valet J.-P., Meynadier L. and Guyodo Y., 2005. Geomagnetic dipole strength and reversal rate over the past two million years. Nature, 435, 802–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Valet J.-P., Fournier A., Courtillot V. and Herrero-Bervera E., 2012. Dynamical similarity of geomagnetic field reversals. Nature, 490, 89–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Watkins N.D. and Walker G.P.L.,1977. Magnetostratigraphy of eastern Iceland. Am. J. Sci., 277, 513–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Watkins N.D., McDougall I. and Kristjansson L., 1977. Upper Miocene and Pliocene geomagnetic secular variation in the Borgarfjordur area of Western Iceland. Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 49, 609–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wilson R.L., 1959. Remanent magnetism of late Secondary and early Tertiary British rocks. Phil. Mag., 4, 750–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wilson R.L., Dagley P. and McCormack A.G., 1972. Palaeomagnetic evidence about the source of the geomagnetic field. Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 28, 213–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yamamoto Y., Tsunakawa H., Shaw J. and Kono M., 2007. Paleomagnetism of the Datong monogenetic volcanoes in China: paleodirection and paleointensity during the middle to early Brunhes chron. Earth Planets Space, 59, 727–746.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Geophysics of the ASCR, v.v.i 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Earth SciencesUniversity of IcelandReykjavikIceland

Personalised recommendations