Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica

, Volume 56, Issue 3, pp 789–802 | Cite as

Modelling accuracy limits for frequency-dependent anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility of rocks and soils

  • František Hrouda
  • Jiří Pokorný
Article

Abstract

The frequency-dependent anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) can be most easily determined through subtracting directional susceptibilities measured at two operating frequencies along each of the measuring directions and the differences subsequently processed using standard methods for AMS computation. The effect of the measurement precision on the accuracy of the determination of the frequency-dependent AMS is investigated through mathematical simulation of the measurement process using the statistical theory of measuring the AMS of rocks. The accuracy of the AMS determination is presented in terms of the errors in determining the principal susceptibilities and principal directions. By modelling the measuring errors, the limits are discovered for the investigation of the frequency-dependent AMS. The modelling shows extremely high requirements for measurement accuracy met by the most sensitive instruments, only.

Keywords

anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility frequency dependence accuracy limits 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Borradaile G., 2003. Statistics of Earth Science Data. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 351 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Dearing J.A., Dann R.J.L., Hay K., Lees J.A., Loveland P.J., Maher B.A. and O’Grady K., 1996. Frequency-dependent susceptibility measurements of environmental materials. Geophys. J. Int., 124, 228–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dunlop D.J. and Özdemir Ö., 1997. Rock Magnetism. Fundamentals and Frontiers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 573 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eyre J.K., 1997. Frequency dependence of magnetic susceptibility for populations of single-domain grains. Geophys. J. Int., 129, 209–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Evans M.E. and Heller F., 2003. Environmental Magnetism: Principles and Applications of Enviromagnetics. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Henry B. 1983. Interprétation quantitative de l’anisotropie de susceptibilité magnétique. Tectonophysics, 91, 165–177 (in French).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Henry B. and Daly L., 1983. From qualitative to quantitative magnetic anisotropy analysis: the prospect of finite strain calibration. Tectonophysics, 98, 327–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hrouda F., 2010. Frequency-dependent AMS of rocks: indicator of SP grain fabric? Eos Trans. AGU, 91(26), Abstract GP33A-03.Google Scholar
  9. Hrouda F. and Pokorný J., 2011. Extremely high demands for measurement accuracy in precise determination of frequency-dependent magnetic susceptibility of rocks and soils. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 55, 667–681, DOI: 10.1007/s11200-010-0079-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hrouda F., Chlupáčová M. and Pokorný J., 2006. Low-field variation of magnetic susceptibility measured by the KLY-4S Kappabridge and KLF-4A Magnetic Susceptibility Meter: Accuracy and interpretational programme. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 50, 283–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Janák F., 1965. Determination of anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility of rocks. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 9, 290–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jelínek V., 1973. Precision A.C. bridge set for measuring magnetic susceptibility of rocks and its anisotropy. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 17, 36–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jelínek V., 1977. The Statistical Theory of Measuring Anistropy of Magnetic Susceptibility of Rocks and Its Application. Geofyzika n.p., Brno, Czech Republic.Google Scholar
  14. Jelínek V., 1981. Characterization of magnetic fabric of rocks. Tectonophysics, 79, T63–T67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nagata T., 1961. Rock Magnetism. Maruzen Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  16. Neél L., 1949. Théorie du trainage magnétique des ferrimagnétiques en grains fins avec applications aux terres cuites. Ann. Géophys., 5, 99–136 (in French).Google Scholar
  17. Pokorný J., Suza P, Pokorný P., Chlupáčová M. and Hrouda F., 2006. Widening power of low-field magnetic methods in the investigation of rocks and environmental materials using the Multi-Function Kappabridge Set. Geophys. Res. Abstr., 8, EGU 06-A-04141.Google Scholar
  18. Pokorný J., Pokorný P., Suza P. and Hrouda F., 2011. A multi-function Kappabridge for high precision measurement of the AMS and the variations of magnetic susceptibility with field, temperature and frequency. In: Petrovský E., Herrero-Bervera E., Harinarayana T. and Ivers D. (Eds.), The Earth’s Magnetic Interior. IAGA Special Sopron Book Series, Volume 1, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 292–301.Google Scholar
  19. Worm H.-U., 1998. On the superparamagnetic — stable single domain transition for magnetite, and frequency dependence of susceptibility. Geophys. J. Int., 133, 201–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Geophysics of the ASCR, v.v.i 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • František Hrouda
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jiří Pokorný
    • 1
  1. 1.AGICO Ltd.BrnoCzech Republic
  2. 2.Institute of Petrology and Structural GeologyCharles UniversityPraha 2Czech Republic

Personalised recommendations