Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica

, Volume 55, Issue 1, pp 87–107 | Cite as

Three-dimensional Crustal model of the Moravo-Silesian region obtained by seismic tomography



All recent available data sets containing traveltimes of Pg and Sg phases for the Moravo-Silesian region were collected. These data come from several experiments designed mostly in 2D (in-line) configurations. Simultaneous processing of all data is possible only considering the true 3D measurement geometry. The goal of this work is to establish the representative 3D seismic model by means of seismic tomography. The resulting minimum-structure model is presented in a simple and easy to use form on the Internet. The amount of processed data is relatively low but repeating the computations with new experimental data included would be very easy. Important material related to this paper is placed on web pages.


seismic tomography 3D seismic velocity model Moravo-Silesian region 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Behm M., Bruckl E., Chwatal W. and Thybo H., 2007. Application of stacking and inversion techniques to three-dimensional wide-angle reflection and refraction seismic data of the Eastern Alps. Geophys. J. Int., 170, 275 298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brož M., 2000. Detection of the origin time and seismic ground motion of quarry blasts. Acta Montana, 16(118), 17–24.Google Scholar
  3. Fischer T. and Horálek J., 2003. Space-time distribution of earthquake swarms in the principal focal zone of the NW Bohemia/Vogtland seismoactive region: period 1985–2001. J. Geodyn., 35, 125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Grad M., Špičák A., Keller G.R., Guterch A., Brož M. and Hegedus A., 2003. SUDETES 2003 seismic experiment. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 47, 681–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Guterch A., Grad M., Keller G.R., Posgay K., Vozar J., Špičák A., Bruckl E., Hajnal Z., Thybo H. and Selvi O., 2003a: CELEBRATION 2000 seismic experiment. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 47, 659–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Guterch A., Grad M., Špičák A., Bruckl E., Hegedus E., Keller G.R. and Thybo H., 2003b. An overview of recent seismic refraction experiments in Central Europe. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 47, 651–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hobro J.W.D., Singh S.C. and Minshull T.A., 2003. Three-dimensional tomographic inversion of combined reflection and refraction seismic traveltime data. Geophys. J. Int., 152, 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hole J.A., 1992. Nonlinear High-Resolution 3-Dimensional Seismic Travel Time Tomograpphy. J. Geophys. Res., 97(B5), 6553–6562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Holub K., 1997. Predisposition to Induced Seismicity in Some Czech Coal Mines. Pure Appl. Geophys., 150, 435–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Holub K., 2007. A study of mining-induced seismicity in Czech coal mines with long-wall coal exploitation. J. Miner. Sci., 43, 37–44.Google Scholar
  11. Holub K., Kaláb, Z., Knejzlík J. and Rušajová J., 2009. Contributiom of the Institute of Geonics AS CR Ostrava to seismological monitoring in Silesia and Northern Moravia. Acta Geodyn. Geomater., 6, 391–398.Google Scholar
  12. Horálek J., Fischer T., Boušková A., Michálek J. and Hrubcová P., 2009. The West Bohemian 2008-earthquake swarm: When, where, what size and data. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 53, 351–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hrubcová P. and Sroda P., 2008. Crustal structure at the easternmost termination of the Variscan belt based on CELEBRATION 2000 and ALP 2002 data. Tectonophysics, 460, 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hrubcová P., Sroda P., Špičák A., Guterch A., Grad M., Keller G.R., Bruckl E. and Thybo H., 2005. Crustal and uppermost mantle structure of the Bohemian Massif based on CELEBRATION 2000 data. J. Geophys. Res., 110, DOI: 10.1029/2004JB003080.Google Scholar
  15. Kalenda P., Zamazal R. and Veselá V., 1998. Mine seismic network in the Lazy Colliery. In: Kaláb Z. (Ed.), Current Trends in Seismology and Engineering Geophysics. Institute of Geonics AS CR Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic, 149–158 (in Czech).Google Scholar
  16. Majdanski M., Grad M. and Guterch A., 2006. 2-D seismic tomographic and ray tracing modeling of the crustal structure across the Sudetes Mountains basing on SUDETES 2003 experiment data. Tectonophysics, 413, 249–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Majdanski M., Kozlovskaya E. and Grad M., 2007. 3D structure of the Earth’s crust beneath the northern part of the Bohemian Massif. Tectonophysics, 437, 17–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Malinowski M., Grad M. and Guterch A., 2008. Three-dimensional seismic modelling of the crustal structure between East European Craton and the Carpathians in SE Poland based on CELEBRATION 2000 data. Geophys. J. Int., 173, 546–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Michelini A., Živčič M. and Suhadolc P., 1998. Simultaneous inversion for velocity structure and hypocenters in Slovenia. J. Seismol., 2, 257–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Procházková D., 1992. Earthquakes in the Jeseníky Mts. in 1986. Travaux Géophysiques, XXXVI, 28–39.Google Scholar
  21. Rao J.N.K. and Shao J., 1992. Jackknife variance estimation with survey data under hot deck imputations. Biometrica, 79, 811–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Růžek B., Hrubcová P., Novotný M., Špičák A. and Karousová O., 2007. Inversion of travel times obtained during active seismic refraction experiments CELEBRATION 2000, ALP 2002 and SUDETES 2003. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 51, 141–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Růžek B., Zedník J., Klíma K. and Ruprechtová L., 2000. Contribution of local seismic networks to the regional velocity model of the Bohemian Massif. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 44, 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Špaček P., Sýkorová Z., Pazdírková J., Švancara J. and Havíř J., 2006. Present-day seismicity of the south-eastern Elbe Fault System (NE Bohemian Massif). Stud. Geophys. Geod., 53, 351–358.Google Scholar
  25. Tichelaar B.W. and Ruff L.J., 1989. How good are our best models? Jackknifing, bootstrapping, and earthquake depth. EOS Trans. AGU, 16, 593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Um J. and Thurber C., 1987. A fast algorithm for two-point seismic ray tracing. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., 77, 972–986.Google Scholar
  27. Wessel P. and Smith W.H.F., 1991. Free software helps map and display data. EOS Trans. AGU, 441, 72.Google Scholar
  28. Zedník J. and Pazdírková J., 2009. Seismic activity in the Czech Republic in 2007. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 53, 269–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zelt C.A., 1999. Modelling strategies and model assessment for wide-angle seismic traveltime data. Geophys. J. Int., 139, 183–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Geophysics of the ASCR, v.v.i 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bohuslav Růžek
    • 1
  • Karel Holub
    • 2
  • Jana Rušajová
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of GeophysicsAcad. Sci. Czech RepublicPrague 4Czech Republic
  2. 2.Institute of GeonicsAcad. Sci. Czech RepublicOstravaCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations