Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica

, Volume 53, Issue 3, pp 345–350 | Cite as

Reply to comment of T. Fischer and J. Horálek on “Geodynamic pattern of the West Bohemia region based on permanent GPS measurements” by V. Schenk, Z. Schenková and Z. Jechumtálová

Reply to Comment

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bohnhoff M., Baisch S. and Harjes H.-P., 2004. Fault mechanisms of induced seismicity at the superdeep German Continental Deep Drilling Program (KTB) borehole and their relation to fault structure and stress field. J. Geophys. Res., 109, B02309, doi: 10.1029/2003JB002528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brudy M., Zoback M. D., Fuchs K., Rummel F. and Baumgärtner J., 1997. Estimation of the complete stress tensor to 8 km depth in the KTB scientific drill holes: Implications for crustal strength. J. Geophys. Res., 102(B8), 13 453–18 475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Heidbach O., Tingay M., Barth A., Reinecker J., Kurfess D. and Müller B., 2008. The 2008 Release of the World Stress Map. Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany, www.world-stressmap.org.Google Scholar
  4. Fischer T. and Horálek J., 2009. Comments by T. Fischer and J. Horálek on “Geodynamic pattern of the West Bohemia region based on permanent GPS measurements” by Schenk V., Schenková Z. and Jechumtálová Z. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 53, 343–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gephart J.W. and Forsyth D.W., 1984. An improved method for determining the regional stress tensor using earthquake focal mechanism data: Application to the San Fernando earthquake sequence. J. Geophys. Res., 89(B11), 9 305–9 320.Google Scholar
  6. Havír J., 2000. Stress analyses in the epicentral area of Nový Kostel (Western Bohemia). Stud. Geophys. Geod., 44, 522–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. McKenzie D.P., 1969. The relation between fault plane solutions for earthquakes and the directions of the principal stresses. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., 59, 591–601.Google Scholar
  8. Mizuno T., Ito H., Kuwahara Y., Imanishi K. and Takeda T., 2005. Spatial variation of shear-wave splitting across an active fault and its implication for stress accumulation mechanism of inland earthquakes: The Atotsugawa fault case. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L20305, doi: 10.1029/2005GL023875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Müller B., Zoback M. L., Fuchs K., Mastin L., Gregersen S., Pavoni N., Stephansson O. and Ljunggren Ch., 1992. Regional patterns of tectonics stress in Europe. J. Geophys. Res., 97(B8), 11 783–11 803.Google Scholar
  10. Raleigh C.B., Healy J.H. and Bredehoeft J.D., 1972. Faulting and crustal stress at Rangely, Colorado. In: Heard H.C., Borg I.Y., Carter N.L. and Raleigh C.B. (Eds.), Flow and Fracture of Rocks. Geophys. Monogr. Ser., 16, AGU, Washington, D.C., 275–284.Google Scholar
  11. Rivera L. and Kanamori H., 2002. Spatial heterogeneity of tectonic stress and friction in the crust. Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 1088, doi: 10.1029/2001GL013803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sbar M.L., 1982. Delineation and interpretation of seismotectonic domains in Western North America. J. Geophys. Res., 87(B5), 3 919–3 928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Schenk V., Schenková Z. and Jechumtálová Z., 2009. Geodynamic pattern of the West Bohemia region based on permanent GPS measurements. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 53, 329–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Seht M. Ibs-von, Plenefisch T. and Schmedes E., 2006. Faulting style and stress field investigations for swarm earthquakes in NE Bavaria/Germany-the transition between Vogtland/NWBohemia and the KTB-site. J. Seismol., 10, 197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Zoback M.L. and Zoback M., 1980. State of stress in the conterminous United States. J. Geophys. Res., 85(B11), 6 113–6 153.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Geophysics of the ASCR, v.v.i 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Earth Dynamics Research, Institute of Rock Structure and MechanicsAcad. Sci. Czech RepublicPraha 8Czech Republic
  2. 2.Institute of GeophysicsAcad. Sci. Czech RepublicPraha 4Czech Republic

Personalised recommendations