Inversion of travel times obtained during active seismic refraction experiments CELEBRATION 2000, ALP 2002 and SUDETES 2003
- 131 Downloads
A series of kinematic inversions based on robust non-linear optimization approach were performed using travel time data from a series of seismic refraction experiments: CELEBRATION 2000, ALP 2002 and SUDETES 2003. These experiments were performed in Central Europe from 2000 to 2003. Data from 8 profiles (CEL09, CEL10, Alp01, S01, S02, S03, S04 and S05) were processed in this study. The goal of this work was to find seismic velocity models yielding travel times consistent with observed data.
Optimum 2D inhomogeneous isotropic P-wave velocity models were computed. We have developed and used a specialized two-step inverse procedure. In the first “parametric” step, the velocity model contains interfaces whose shapes are defined by a number of parameters. The velocity along each interface is supposed to be constant but may be different along the upper and lower side of the interface. Linear vertical interpolation is used for points in between interfaces. All parameters are searched for using robust non-linear optimization (Differential Evolution algorithm). Rays are continuously traced by the bending technique. In the second “tomographic” step, small-scale velocity perturbations are introduced in a dense grid covering the currently obtained velocity model. Rays are fixed in this step. Final velocity models yield travel time residuals comparable to typical picking errors (RMS ∼ 0.1 s).
As a result, depth-velocity cross-sections of P waves along all processed profiles are obtained. The depth range of the models is 35–50 km, the velocity varies in the range 3.5–8.2 km/s. Lowest velocities are detected in near-surface depth sections crossing sedimentary formations. The middle crust is generally more homogeneous and has typical P wave velocity around 6 km/s. Surprisingly the lower crust is less homogeneous and the computed velocity is in the range 6.5–7.5 km/s. The MOHO is detected in the depth ≈30–45 km.
Keywordsseismic tomography kinematic velocity inversion Bohemian Massif CELEBRATION 2000 ALP 2002 SUDETES 2003
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Hole, J.A., 1992. Nonlinear high resolution three-dimensional seismic travel time tomography. J. Geophys. Res., 97(B5), 6553–6562.Google Scholar
- Hrubcová P., Šroda P., Špičák A., A. Guterch, M. Grad, G. R. Keller, E. Brückl, and H. Thybo, 2005. Crustal and uppermost mantle structure of the Bohemian Massif based on CELEBRATION 2000 data. J. Geophys. Res., 110, B11305, doi:10.1029/2004JB003080.Google Scholar
- Málek J., Brož M., Fischer T., Horálek J., Hrubcová P., Janský J., Novotný O., Růžek B. and the CELEBRATION Working Group, 2001. Seismic measurements along short profiles in Western Bohemia during the CELEBRATION 2000 experiment. Acta Montana IRSM AS CR, 18, 15–28.Google Scholar
- Press W.H., Teukolsky S.A., Vetterling W.T. and Flannery B.P., 1992. Numerical Recipes in C. The Art of Scientific Computing. Second Edition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Price K. and Storn R., 1997. Differential Evolution. Dr. Dobb’s Journal, April 1997, 18–24.Google Scholar
- Růžek B. and Kvasnička M., 2005. Earthquake hypocenter location: a challenge for the differential evolution algorithm. In: K. Price, R. Storn and J. Lampinen (Eds.), Differential Evolution, A Practical Approach to Global Optimization, Springer-Verlag Berlin, 379–392.Google Scholar
- Růžek B., Vavryčuk V., Hrubcová P. and Zedník J. and the CELEBRATION 2000 working group, 2003. Crustal anisotropy in the Bohemian Massif, Czech Republic: observations based on Central European Lithospheric Experiment Based on Refraction (CELEBRATION) 2000. J. Geophys. Res., 108(B8), 2392, oi:10.1029/2002JB002242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stark P.B., 1992. Inference in infinite-dimensional inverse problems: discretization and duality. J. Geophys. Res., 97(B10), 14055–14082.Google Scholar
- Um J. and Thurber C., 1987. A fast algorithm for two-point seismic ray tracing. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., 77, 972–986.Google Scholar
- Wessel P. and Smith W.H.F., 1991. Free software helps map and display data. EOS Trans. AGU, 441, 72.Google Scholar
- Zhang H. and Thurber C., 2005. Adaptive mesh seismic tomography based on tetrahedral and Voronoi diagrams: Application to Parkfield, California. J. Geophys. Res., 110(B4), B04303, doi:10.1029/2004JB003186.Google Scholar