Understanding Processes of Transformative Change: A Qualitative Inquiry into Empowering Sources and Outcomes Identified by Women in Rural Nicaragua
- 14 Downloads
Despite decades of research on women’s human rights and empowerment across several academic disciplines, inequities between women and men persist at alarming rates across the globe. The current study employs an in-depth exploration of how programs intended for empowering purposes impact individual women’s lives, focusing on the transformation promoted at multiple ecological levels. More specifically, the present study assesses how women involved in a feminist organization in rural Nicaragua were affected by their participation in the organization. Via analysis of qualitative interviews with 14 women, we identify aspects of the organization most associated with actualizing transformative change and assess how involvement in the organization affected women’s sense of self and lived experience. Specifically, we identify and explicate two themes: (a) moving forward, which details aspects of the organization that facilitated positive changes for women, and (b) feminist autoconocimiento, which involved developing an understanding of oneself as capable of offering valuable contributions to their homes and communities. Findings have implications for promoting empowering contexts for women, with a focus on ensuring that desired empowering change is occurring for the women involved.
KeywordsWomen’s rights Empowerment Social change Nicaragua Community
The present research was made possible by financial assistance from the Ruth Landes Memorial Research Fund, a program of The Reed Foundation and a University of California Chancellor’s Dissertation Fellowship. Our sincere gratitude goes to several people who supported this work: Carlos Arenas, Joanna Beltrán Girón, Drs. Regina Langhout, Phil Hammack and Jessica Taft, the research team at CINASE, and the members of Xochilt Acalt.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
No portions of this report have been published elsewhere and this research is not under review at another circulating journal. The research presented here was conducted in accordance with the ethical guidelines of the American Psychological Association.
- Brodsky, A. E., O’Campo, P. J., & Aronson, R. E. (1999). PSOC in community context: Multi- level correlates of a measure of psychological sense of community in low-income, urban neighborhoods. Journal of Community Psychology, 27(6), 659–679. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(199911)27:6<659::AID-JCOP3>3.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Campbell, C., & Jovchelovitch, S. (2000). Health, community and development: Towards a social psychology of participation. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 10(4), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1298(200007/08)10:4<255::AID-CASP582>3.0.CO;2-M.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cornwall, A., & Eade, D. (Eds.). (2011). Deconstructing development discourse: Buzzwords and fuzzwords. Oxford, UK: Oxfam GB Practical Action Publishing.Google Scholar
- Dutt, A. (2017). Civic participation, prefigurative politics, and feminist solidarity in rural Nicaragua. In S. Grabe (Ed.), Women’s human rights: A social psychological perspective on resistance, liberation, and justice (pp. 151–178). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Dutt, A., & Grabe, S. (2017). Gender ideology and social transformation: Using mixed methods to explore the role of deideologization in the promotion of women's human rights in Tanzania. Sex Roles, 77, 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0729-4.
- Dutt, A., & Kohfeldt, D. (2018). Towards a liberatory ethics of care framework for organizing social change. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 6(2), 575–590. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v6i2.909.
- Francis, J. J., Johnston, M., Robertson, C., Glidewell, L., Entwistle, V., Eccles, M. P., & Grimshaw, J. M. (2010). What is an adequate sample size? Operationalizing data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychology and Health, 25, 1229–1245. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440903194015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Frederick, J. K., & Stewart, A. J. (2018). “I became a lioness”: Pathways to feminist identity among women’s movement activists. Psychology of Women Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684318771326.
- Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.Google Scholar
- Freire, P. (1972). Cultural action for freedom. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Grabe, S. (2016). Narrating a psychology of resistance: Voices from the compañeras in Nicaragua. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Grabe, S. (Ed.). (2017). Women's human rights: A social psychological perspective on resistance, liberation, and justice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hammack, P. L. (2011). Narrative and the politics of identity: The cultural psychology of Israeli and Palestinian youth. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Josselson, R. (2011). Narrative research: Constructing, deconstructing and reconstructing story. In K. Charmaz, L. McMullen, R. Josselson, R. Anderson, & E. McSpadden (Eds.), Five ways of doing qualitative analysis (pp. 224–242). New York: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar
- Kampwirth, K. (2004). Feminism and the legacy of revolution: Nicaragua, El Salvador, Chiapas. Cincinnati, OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
- Martín-Baró, I. (1994). Writings for a liberation psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Moane, G. (2011). Gender and colonialism. A psychological analysis of oppression and liberation. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
- Molyneux, M. (1985). Mobilization without emancipation? Women's interests, the state, and revolution in Nicaragua. Feminist Studies, 11, 227–254. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3177922.
- Montenegro, S., & Cuadra, E. (2004). The keys to empowerment: Ten years of experiences at the Xochilt-Acalt Women’s Center in Malpiasillo, Nicaragua. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Coordinating Council on Nicaragua (WCCN). Retrieved from http://cinco.org.ni/archive/12.pdf.
- Montero, M. (2012). From complexity and social justice to consciousness: Ideas that have built a community psychology. Global Journal of Community Psychology Practice, 3(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
- Randall, M. (1994). Sandino's daughters revisited: Feminism in Nicaragua. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
- Sáiz-Manzanares, M. C., & Pérez Pérez, M. I. (2016). Autorregulación y mejora del autoconocimiento en resolución de problemas [Self-regulation and improvement of self-knowledge in problem solving]. Psicología desde el Caribe, 33(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1174/02103709560561159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sarbin, T. R. (1986). Narrative psychology: The storied nature of human conduct. Westport, CT: Praeger/Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
- Savaş, Ö., & Stewart, A. J. (2018). Alternative pathways to activism: Intersections of social and personal pasts in the narratives of women’s rights activists. In Alternative pathways to activism: Intersections of social and personal pasts in the narratives of women’s rights activists. Qualitative Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000117.
- Sudbury, J., & Okazawa-Rey, M. (2009). Activist scholarship: Antiracism, feminism, and social change. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
- United Nation. (2016). Human development report. New York: United Nations. Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2016_human_development_report.pdf.Google Scholar
- Vázquez Piatti, M. (2008). El autoconocimiento, la base de la autoestima [self-knowledge, the basis of self-esteem]. Retrieved from http://www.abc.com.py/articulos/el-autoconocimiento-la-base-de-la-autoestima-1059212.Html.
- Wilson, T. D., & Dunn, E. W. (2004). Self-knowledge: Its limits, value, and potential for improvement. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 493–518. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141954.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar