Advertisement

Sex Roles

pp 1–16 | Cite as

Laboring to Make Sex “Safe”: Sexual Vigilance in Young U.S. College Women

  • Harley DutcherEmail author
  • Sara I. McClelland
Original Article
  • 57 Downloads

Abstract

Definitions of “safe sex” often focus on the use of condoms and contraception, but largely ignore other dimensions of safety, such as efforts to feel emotionally or physically safe. These gaps in the definition of the term safety demand greater attention to how being safe and feeling safe are interpreted by individuals who live and engage in sexual lives marked by social and political inequality. In the current study, we draw on interviews with 17 young women ages 18–28 from a U.S. urban university to examine efforts they used to protect themselves in sexual relationships. When having sex with men, we found young women relied on a range of efforts to keep themselves safe, such as controlling their own sexual desire, developing strict contraceptive regimens, and building relational contexts characterized by physical and emotional safety. We argue that sexual safety labor (i.e., “good” contraceptive behavior, “waiting” to have sex, and “careful” decision-making) offers evidence of what safe sex requires of young women. We examine this range of cognitions and behaviors as forms of labor directed at making sex feel and be safe; however, young women did not describe these efforts in terms of their own time or energy. In our analysis, we suggest that vigilance in sexual relationships has become part of young women’s required repertoire of safe sex behaviors, but largely goes unnoticed by them. We connect these findings with public health campaigns that teach young people about safety and offer alternatives for researchers looking to understand and study what is imagined as “safe sex.”

Keywords

Adolescence Sexuality Relationships Gender Contraception 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thank you to Abby Stewart, Jacqueline Mattis, and Elizabeth Armstrong who provided feedback on earlier versions of the manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

The research presented within this manuscript was conducted in accordance with the ethical guidelines set by the American Psychological Association and the Institutional Review Boards of the relevant authors’ institutions. This manuscript is not currently under review at any other journal, nor has any portion of it been published previously.

Informed Consent

Anonymized data from participants who consented to data sharing are available by e-mailing the corresponding author.

Supplementary material

11199_2019_1004_MOESM1_ESM.docx (15 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 15 kb)

References

  1. Alexander, K. A. (2012). Sexual safety and sexual security: Broadening the sexual health discourse (Unpublished dissertation). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. Retrieved November 8, 2017, from http://proxy.lib.umich.edu/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/1287145169?accountid=14667.
  2. Amaro, H. (1995). Love, sex, and power: Considering women's realities in HIV prevention. American Psychologist, 50(6), 437–447.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.50.6.437.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Amaro, H., & Raj, A. (2000). On the margin: Power and women’s HIV risk reduction strategies. Sex Roles, 42(7–8), 723–749.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007059708789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barcelos, C., & Gubrium, A. (2018). Bodies that tell: Embodying teen pregnancy through digital storytelling. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 43(4), 905–927.  https://doi.org/10.1086/696627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartky, S. L. (1988). Foucault, femininity, and the modernization of patriarchal power. In I. Diamond & L. Quinby (Eds.), Feminism and Foucault: Reflections on resistance (pp. 61–86). Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bay-Cheng, L. Y. (2003). The trouble of teen sex: The construction of adolescent sexuality through school-based sexuality education. Sex Education: Sexuality, Society and Learning, 3(1), 61–74.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1468181032000052162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bay-Cheng, L. Y. (2015). The agency line: A neoliberal metric for appraising young women’s sexuality. Sex Roles, 73(7–8), 279–291.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0452-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bay-Cheng, L. Y., & Eliseo-Arras, R. K. (2008). The making of unwanted sex: Gendered and neoliberal norms in college women's unwanted sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 45(4), 386–397.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490802398381.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bay-Cheng, L. Y., Livingston, J. A., & Fava, N. M. (2011). Adolescent girls’ assessment and management of sexual risks: Insights from focus group research. Youth & Society, 43(3), 1167–1193.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X10384475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berkowitz, R., Callen, M., & Dworkin, R. (1983). How to have sex in an epidemic: One approach. New York: News from the Front Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Bourne, A. H., & Robson, M. A. (2009). Perceiving risk and (re) constructing safety: The lived experience of having ‘safe’ sex. Health, Risk & Society, 11(3), 283–295.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570902906421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bowleg, L., Lucas, K. J., & Tschann, J. M. (2004). “The ball was always in his court”: An exploratory analysis of relationship scripts, sexual scripts, and condom use among African American women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28(1), 70–82.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00124.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Braun, V. (2013). “Proper sex without annoying things”: Anti-condom discourse and the ‘nature’ of (hetero) sex. Sexualities, 16(3–4), 361–382.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460713479752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burkett, M., & Hamilton, K. (2012). Postfeminist sexual agency: Young women’s negotiations of sexual consent. Sexualities, 15(7), 815–833.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460712454076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burt, M. R., & Estep, R. E. (1981). Apprehension and fear: Learning a sense of sexual vulnerability. Sex Roles, 7(5), 511–522.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cacchioni, T. (2007). Heterosexuality and “the labour of love”: A contribution to recent debates on female sexual dysfunction. Sexualities, 10(3), 299–320.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460707078320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2017). HIV among women. Retrieved May 1, 2016, from https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/gender/women/index.html.
  18. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  19. Clark, R., Benkert, R. A., & Flack, J. M. (2006). Large arterial elasticity varies as a function of gender and racism-related vigilance in black youth. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39(4), 562–569.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.02.012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Curtin, N., Ward, L. M., Merriwether, A., & Caruthers, A. (2011). Femininity ideology and sexual health in young women: A focus on sexual knowledge, embodiment, and agency. International Journal of Sexual Health, 23(1), 48–62.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2010.524694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dickson, N., van Roode, T., Cameron, C., & Paul, C. (2013). Stability and change in same-sex attraction, experience, and identity by sex and age in a New Zealand birth cohort. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(5), 753–763.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-0063-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Dottolo, A. L., & Stewart, A. J. (2008). “Don’t ever forget now, you’re a black man in America”: Intersections of race, class and gender in encounters with the police. Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 350–364.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9387-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Estes, M. L. (2017). “If there’s one benefit, you’re not going to get pregnant”: The sexual miseducation of gay, lesbian, and bisexual individuals. Sex Roles, 77(9–10), 615–627.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0749-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fanghanel, A., & Lim, J. (2015). Of “sluts” and “arseholes”: Antagonistic desire and the production of sexual vigilance. Feminist Criminology, 12(4), 341–360.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085115613431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fantasia, H. C., & Fontenot, H. B. (2011). The sexual safety of adolescents. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 40(2), 217–224.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.2011.01217.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Farvid, P., & Braun, V. (2006). ‘Most of us guys are raring to go anytime, anyplace, anywhere’: Male and female sexuality in Cleo and Cosmo. Sex Roles, 55(5–6), 295–310.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9084-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Farvid, P., Braun, V., & Rowney, C. (2017). “No girl wants to be called a slut!”: Women, heterosexual casual sex and the sexual double standard. Journal of Gender Studies, 26(5), 544–560.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2016.1150818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fine, M. (1988). Sexuality, schooling, and adolescent females: The missing discourse of desire. Harvard Educational Review, 58(1), 29–54.  https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.58.1.u0468k1v2n2n8242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fine, M., & McClelland, S. (2006). Sexuality education and desire: Still missing after all these years. Harvard Educational Review, 76(3), 297–338.  https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.76.3.w5042g23122n6703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fine, M., Freudenberg, N., Payne, Y., Perkins, T., Smith, K., & Wanzer, K. (2003). “Anything can happen with police around”: Urban youth evaluate strategies of surveillance in public places. Journal of Social Issues, 59(1), 141–158.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.t01-1-00009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Flanders, C. E., Robinson, M., Legge, M. M., & Tarasoff, L. A. (2016). Negative identity experiences of bisexual and other non-monosexual people: A qualitative report. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health, 20(2), 152–172.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19359705.2015.1108257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Frost, J. J., Lindberg, L. D., & Finer, L. B. (2012). Young adults’ contraceptive knowledge, norms and attitudes: Associations with risk of unintended pregnancy. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 44(2), 107–116.  https://doi.org/10.1363/4410712.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hamilton, L., & Armstrong, E. A. (2009). Gendered sexuality in young adulthood double binds and flawed options. Gender & Society, 23(5), 589–616.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243209345829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Higgins, J. A., & Browne, I. (2008). Sexual needs, control, and refusal: How “doing” class and gender influences sexual risk taking. Journal of Sex Research, 45(3), 233–245.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490802204415.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Higgins, J. A., & Wang, Y. (2015). The role of young adults’ pleasure attitudes in shaping condom use. American Journal of Public Health, 105(7), 1329–1332.  https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302567.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Hirschman, C., Impett, E. A., & Schooler, D. (2006). Dis/embodied voices: What late-adolescent girls can teach us about objectification and sexuality. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 3(4), 8–20.  https://doi.org/10.1525/srsp.2006.3.4.8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hlavka, H. R. (2014). Normalizing sexual violence: Young women account for harassment and abuse. Gender & Society, 28(3), 337–358.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243214526468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Holland, J., Ramazanoglu, C., Scott, S., Sharpe, S., & Thomson, R. (1992). Pressure, resistance, empowerment: Young women and the negotiation of safer sex. In P. Aggleton, P. M. Davies, & G. Hart (Eds.), AIDS: Rights, risk, and reason (pp. 142–162). London: Routlege Falmer.Google Scholar
  39. Hollander, J. A. (2001). Vulnerability and dangerousness: The construction of gender through conversation about violence. Gender & Society, 15(1), 83–109.  https://doi.org/10.1177/089124301015001005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ibañez, G. E., Whitt, E., Avent, T., Martin, S. S., Varga, L. M., Cano, M. A., … O’Connell, D. J. (2017). “Love and trust, you can be blinded”: HIV risk within relationships among Latina women in Miami, Florida. Ethnicity & Health, 22(5), 510–527.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2016.1244737.
  41. Jeffrey, N. K., & Barata, P. C. (2017). “He didn’t necessarily force himself upon me, but...” Women’s lived experiences of sexual coercion in intimate relationships with men. Violence Against Women, 23(8), 911–933.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216652507.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Kimport, K. (2018). More than a physical burden: Women’s mental and emotional work in preventing pregnancy. The Journal of Sex Research, 55(9), 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1311834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Klesse, C. (2005). Bisexual women, non-monogamy and differentialist anti-promiscuity discourses. Sexualities, 8(4), 445–464.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460705056620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Koester, K., Amico, R. K., Gilmore, H., Liu, A., McMahan, V., Mayer, K., … Grant, R. (2017). Risk, safety and sex among male PrEP users: Time for a new understanding. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 19(12), 1301–1313.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2017.1310927.
  45. Kuehnel, S. S. (2009). Abstinence-only education fails African American youth. Washington University Law Review, 86, 1241. Retrieved October 1, 2018, from http://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol86/iss5/5.
  46. Lamb, S. (2010). Toward a sexual ethics curriculum: Bringing philosophy and society to bear on individual development. Harvard Educational Review, 80(1), 81–106.  https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.80.1.c104834k00552457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lee, H., & Hicken, M. T. (2016). Death by a thousand cuts: The health implications of black respectability politics. Souls, 18(2–4), 421–445.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10999949.2016.1230828.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Lima, A. C., Davis, T. L., Hilyard, K., Jeffries, W. L., & Muilenburg, J. L. (2018). Individual, interpersonal, and sociostructural factors influencing partner nonmonogamy acceptance among young African American women. Sex Roles, 78(7–8), 467–481.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0811-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Littleton, H. L., Grills-Taquechel, A. E., Buck, K. S., Rosman, L., & Dodd, J. C. (2013). Health risk behavior and sexual assault among ethnically diverse women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(1), 7–21.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312451842.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. McClelland, S. I. (2011). Who is the “self” in self-reports of sexual satisfaction? Research and policy implications. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 8(4), 304–320.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-011-0067-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McClelland, S. I. (2014). “What do you mean when you say that you’re sexually satisfied?” a mixed methods study. Feminism & Psychology, 24(1), 74–96.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353513508392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McClelland, S. I. (2017). Gender and sexual labor near the end of life: Advanced breast cancer and femininity norms. Women's Reproductive Health, 4(1), 29–45.  https://doi.org/10.1080/23293691.2017.1276367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McClelland, S. I. (2018). Critical methods for studying adolescent sexuality. In S. Lamb & J. Gilbert (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of sexual development: Childhood and adolescence (Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology, pp. 281–299). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108116121.015.
  54. McClelland, S. I., & Fine, M. (2008). Embedded science: The production of consensus in evaluation of abstinence-only curricula. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(2), 50–81.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708607310782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. McClelland, S. I., Rubin, J. D., & Bauermeister, J. A. (2016). Adapting to injustice: Young bisexual women’s interpretations of microaggressions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(4), 532–550.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316664514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. McIlvenna, R. T. (1986). Safe sex in the age of AIDS. Secaucus: Citadel Press.Google Scholar
  57. Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674–697.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Meyer, I. H., Ouellette, S. C., Haile, R., & McFarlane, T. A. (2011). “We’d be free”: Narratives of life without homophobia, racism, or sexism. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 8(3), 204–214.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-011-0063-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Morgan, E. M., & Zurbriggen, E. L. (2007). Wanting sex and wanting to wait: Young adults’ accounts of sexual messages from first significant dating partners. Feminism & Psychology, 17(4), 515–541.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353507083102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Muehlenhard, C. L., Humphreys, T. P., Jozkowski, K. N., & Peterson, Z. D. (2016). The complexities of sexual consent among college students: A conceptual and empirical review. The Journal of Sex Research, 53(4–5), 457–487.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1146651.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Mullinax, M., Sanders, S., Higgins, J., Dennis, B., Reece, M., & Fortenberry, D. (2016). Establishment of safety paradigms and trust in emerging adult relationships. Culture, Health, & Sexuality, 18(8), 890–904.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2016.1148779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Otto-Salaj, L. L., Traxel, N., Brondino, M. J., Reed, B., Gore-Felton, C., Kelly, J. A., … Stevenson, L. Y. (2010). Reactions of heterosexual African American men to women’s condom negotiation strategies. Journal of Sex Research, 47(6), 539–551.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490903216763.
  63. Pearson, J. (2006). Personal control, self-efficacy in sexual negotiation, and contraceptive risk among adolescents: The role of gender. Sex Roles, 54(9–10), 615–625.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9028-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Phillips, L. (1998). The girls report: What we know & need to know about growing up female. New York: National Council for Research on Women.Google Scholar
  65. Phillips, L. (2000). Flirting with danger: Young women's reflections on sexuality and domination. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  66. Pulerwitz, J., & Dworkin, S. L. (2006). Give-and-take in safer sex negotiations: The fluidity of gender-based power relations. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 3(3), 40–51.  https://doi.org/10.1525/srsp.2006.3.3.40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Robin, L., Dittus, P., Whitaker, D., Crosby, R., Ethier, K., Mezoff, J., … Pappas-Deluca, K. (2004). Behavioral interventions to reduce incidence of HIV, STD, and pregnancy among adolescents: A decade in review. Journal of Adolescent Health, 34(1), 3–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1054-139X(03)00244-1.
  68. Rutherford, A. (2018). Feminism, psychology, and the gendering of neoliberal subjectivity: From critique to disruption. Theory & Psychology, 28(5), 619–644.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354318797194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sheeran, P., Abraham, C., & Orbell, S. (1999). Psychosocial correlates of heterosexual condom use: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(1), 90–132.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.1.90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Smith, D. E. (1988). Femininity as discourse. In L. G. Roman, L. K. Christian-Smith, & L. Ellsworth (Eds.), Becoming feminine: The politics of popular culture (pp. 37–59). London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  71. Sue, D. W. (2010). Microaggressions in everyday life: Race, gender, and sexual orientation. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  72. Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. In C. Willig & W. R. Stainton-Rogers (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology (2nd ed., pp. 17–37). London: Sage Publications Ltd..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tolman, D. L. (2009). Dilemmas of desire: Teenage girls talk about sexuality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Tolman, D. L. (2012). Female adolescents, sexual empowerment and desire: A missing discourse of gender inequity. Sex Roles, 66(11–12), 746–757.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0122-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Tolman, D. L., & McClelland, S. I. (2011). Normative sexuality development in adolescence: A decade in review, 2000–2009. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 242–255.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00726.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Trinh, S. L. (2016). “Enjoy your sexuality, but do it in secret”: Exploring undergraduate women’s reports of friends’ sexual communications. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(1), 96–107.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315596914.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Turrini, M. (2015). A genealogy of “healthism”: Healthy subjectivities between individual autonomy and disciplinary control. Eä - Journal of Medical Humanities & Social Studies of Science and Technology, 7(1), 11–27. Retrieved May 1, 2016, from http://www.ea-journal.com/en/issues/2016-04-01-01-24-42.
  78. Ussher, J. M. (2010). Are we medicalizing women’s misery? A critical review of women’s higher rates of reported depression. Feminism & Psychology, 20(1), 9–35.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353509350213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243287001002002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Widman, L., Noar, S. M., Choukas-Bradley, S., & Francis, D. B. (2014). Adolescent sexual health communication and condom use: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 33(10), 1113–1124.  https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000112.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  81. Wiederman, M. W. (2005). The gendered nature of sexual scripts. The Family Journal, 13(4), 496–502.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480705278729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Willig, C. (2013). Introducing qualitative research in psychology (3rd ed.). UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Willig, C. (2017). Interpretation in qualitative research. In C. Willig & W. R. Stainton-Rogers (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology (2nd ed., pp. 274–288). London: Sage Publications Ltd..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wingood, G. M., & DiClemente, R. J. (2000). Application of the theory of gender and power to examine HIV-related exposures, risk factors, and effective interventions for women. Health Education & Behavior, 27(5), 539–565.  https://doi.org/10.1177/109019810002700502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zaal, M., Salah, T., & Fine, M. (2007). The weight of the hyphen: Freedom, fusion and responsibility embodied by young Muslim-American women during a time of surveillance. Applied Development Science, 11(3), 164–177.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10888690701454674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., See, L., & O’Sullivan, L. (2015). Young women’s satisfaction with sex and romance, and emotional reactions to sex: Associations with sexual entitlement, efficacy, and situational factors. Emerging Adulthood, 3(2), 113–122.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696814548060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departments of Women’s Studies and PsychologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations