Advertisement

Sex Roles

pp 1–16 | Cite as

Fathers’ Paternity Leave-Taking and Children’s Perceptions of Father-Child Relationships in the United States

  • Richard J. PettsEmail author
  • Chris Knoester
  • Jane Waldfogel
Original Article

Abstract

Paternity leave-taking is believed to benefit children by encouraging father-child bonding after a birth and enabling commitments to fathers’ engagement. Yet, no known U.S. studies have directly focused on the associations between paternity leave-taking and children’s reports of father-child relationships. Understanding the potential consequences of paternity leave-taking in the United States is particularly important given the lack of a national paid parental leave policy. The present study uses five waves of data on 1319 families, largely socioeconomically disadvantaged, from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study to analyze the associations between paternity leave-taking and 9-year-old children’s reports of their father-child relationships. We also assess the extent to which these associations are mediated by fathers’ engagement, co-parenting quality, parental relationship satisfaction, and fathers’ identities. Results indicate that leave-taking, and particularly 2 weeks or more of leave, is positively associated with children’s perceptions of fathers’ involvement, father-child closeness, and father-child communication. The associations are explained, at least in part, by fathers’ engagement, parental relationship satisfaction, and father identities. Overall, results highlight the linked lives of fathers and their children, and they suggest that increased attention on improving opportunities for parental leave in the United States may help to strengthen families by nurturing higher quality father-child relationships.

Keywords

Family policy Family roles Father-child relations Fatherhood Paternity leave Parental leave 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The present research was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R03HD087875. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The authors of this manuscript have verified that they have read and are in compliance with the guidelines of the 6th ed. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary material

11199_2019_1050_MOESM1_ESM.docx (37 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 37 kb)

References

  1. Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4, 139–158.  https://doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albiston, C., & O’Connor, L. T. (2016). Just leave. Harvard Women’s Law Journal, 39, 1–65.Google Scholar
  3. Almqvist, A., & Duvander, A. (2014). Changes in gender equality? Swedish fathers’ parental leave, division of childcare and housework. Journal of Family Studies, 20, 19–27.  https://doi.org/10.5172/jfs.2014.20.1.19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Austin, P. C., & Stewart, E. A. (2015). Moving toward best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Statistics in Medicine, 34, 3661–3679.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Blum, S., Koslowski, A., Macht, A., & Moss, P. (Eds.). (2018). International review of leave policies and research 2018. Retrieved on February 1, 2019 from http://www.leavenetwork.org/lp_and_r_reports/.
  6. Bratberg, E., & Naz, G. (2014). Does paternity leave affect mothers’ sickness absence? European Sociological Review, 30, 500–511.  https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcu058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Breen, R., Karlson, K. B., & Holm, A. (2013). Total, direct, and indirect effects in logit and probit models. Sociological Methods and Research, 42, 164–191.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124113494572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, G. L., Mangelsdorf, S. C., & Neff, C. (2012). Father involvement, paternal sensitivity, and father-child attachment security in the first three years. Journal of Family Psychology, 26, 421–430.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027836.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Bünning, M. (2015). What happens after the ‘daddy months’? Fathers’ involvement in paid work, childcare, and housework after taking parental leave in Germany. European Sociological Review, 31, 738–748.  https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcv072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2018). Access to paid personal leave, December 2017. Retrieved on February 1, 2019 from https://www.bls.gov/ebs/paid_personal_leave_122017.htm.
  11. Cabrera, N. J., Fagan, J., & Farrie, D. (2008). Explaining the long reach of fathers’ prenatal involvement on later paternal engagement. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 1094–1107.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00551.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carlson, M. J. (2006). Family structure, father involvement, and adolescent behavioral outcomes. Journal of Marriage & Family, 68(1), 137–154.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00239.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carlson, D. L., Hanson, S., & Fitzroy, A. (2016). The division of child care, sexual intimacy, and relationship quality in couples. Gender & Society, 30, 442–466.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243215626709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carlson, D. L., Miller, A. J., & Sassler, S. (2018). Stalled for whom? Change in the division of particular housework tasks and their consequences for middle- to low-income couples. Socius.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023118765867.
  15. Cattaneo, M. D. (2010). Efficient semiparametric estimation of multi-valued treatment effects under ignorability. Journal of Econometrics, 155, 138–154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2009.09.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.  https://doi.org/10.1086/228943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cox, M. J., Paley, B., & Harter, K. (2001). Interparental conflict and parent-child relationships. In J. H. Grych & F. D. Fincham (Eds.), Interparental conflict and child development: Theory, research, and application (pp. 249–272). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davies, P. T., & Cummings, E. M. (1994). Marital conflict and child adjustment: An emotional security hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 387–411.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. DiPrete, T. A., & Eirich, G. M. (2006). Cumulative advantage as a mechanism for inequality: A review of theoretical and empirical developments. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 271–297.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.32.061604.123127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Doucet, A. (2013). Gender roles and fathering. In N. J. Cabrera & C. S. Tamis-Lemonda (Eds.), Handbook of father involvement: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 297–319). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Duvander, A. (2014). How long should parental leave be? Attitudes to gender equality, family, and work as determinants of women’s and men’s parental leave in Sweden. Journal of Family Issues, 35, 909–926.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X14522242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Edin, K., & Nelson, T. J. (2013). Doing the best I can: Fatherhood in the inner city. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  23. Elder Jr., G. H. (1994). Time, human agency, and social change: Perspectives on the life course. Social Psychological Quarterly, 57, 4–15.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2786971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Elder Jr., G. H. (1998). The life course as developmental theory. Child Development, 69, 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1132065.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Erel, O., & Burman, B. (1995). Interrelatedness of marital relations and parent-child relations: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 108–132.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.108.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ferraro, K. F., Shippee, T. P., & Schafer, M. H. (2009). Cumulative inequality theory for research on aging and the life course. In V. L. Bengston, D. Gans, N. M. Pulney, & M. Silverstein (Eds.), Handbook of theories of aging (2nd ed., pp. 413–433). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Flouri, E., & Buchanan, A. (2002). What predicts good relationships with parents in adolescence and partners in adult life: Findings from the 1958 British birth cohort. Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 186–198.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.16.2.186.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Frisco, M. L., & Williams, K. (2003). Perceived housework equity, marital happiness, and divorce in dual-earner households. Journal of Family Issues, 24, 51–73.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X02238520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gerson, K. (2010). The unfinished revolution: How a new generation is reshaping family, work, and gender in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Gilligan, M., Karraker, A., & Jasper, A. (2018). Linked lives and cumulative inequality: A multigenerational family life course framework. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 10, 111–125.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Goldberg, J. S. (2015). Identity and involvement among resident and nonresident fathers. Journal of Family Issues, 36, 852–879.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x13500963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grych, J. H., & Fincham, F. D. (1990). Marital conflict and children’s adjustment: A cognitive-contextual framework. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 267–290.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Haas, L., & Hwang, C. P. (2008). The impact of taking parental leave on fathers’ participation in childcare and relationships with children: Lessons from Sweden. Community, Work & Family, 11, 85–104.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13668800701785346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harrington, B., Van Deusen, F., Fraone, J. S., Eddy, S., & Haas, L. (2014). The new dad: Take your leave. Boston College Center for work and family. Retrieved on February 1, 2019 from https://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/centers/cwf/research/publications3/researchreports/The%20New%20Dad%202014_Take%20Your%20Leave.
  35. Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrics, 47, 153–161.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1912352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Huerta, M. C., Adema, W., Baxter, J., Han, W., Lausten, M., Lee, R., … Waldfogel, J. (2014). Fathers’ leave and fathers’ involvement: Evidence from four OECD countries. European Journal of Social Security, 16, 308–346.  https://doi.org/10.1177/138826271401600403
  37. Johansson, E. (2010). The effect of own and spousal parental leave on earnings. Institute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation (Sweden), Working Paper 2010:4. Retrieved on February 1, 2019 from https://www.econstor.eu/dspace/bitstream/10419/45782/1/623752174.pdf
  38. Klerman, J. A., Daley, K., & Pozniak, A. (2012). Family and medical leave in 2012: Technical report. Cambridge: Abt Associates. Retrieved on February 1, 2019 from https://www.dol.gov/asp/evaluation/fmla/fmla-2012-technical-report.pdf.
  39. Knoester, C., Petts, R. J., & Pragg, B. (2019). Paternity leave-taking and father involvement among socioeconomically disadvantaged fathers. Sex Roles.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0994-5.
  40. Kohler, U., Karlson, K. B., & Holm, A. (2011). Comparing coefficients of nested nonlinear probability models. Stata Journal, 11, 420–438.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1101100306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kotsadam, A., & Finseraas, H. (2011). The state intervenes in the battle of the sexes: Causal effects of paternity leave. Social Science Research, 40, 1611–1622.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.06.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lamb, M. E. (2010). How do fathers influence children’s development? Let me count the ways. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (5th ed., pp. 1–26). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  43. Lamb, M. E., & Lewis, C. (2010). The development and significance of father-child relationships in two-parent families. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (5th ed., pp. 94–153). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  44. Lichtman-Sadot, S., & Bell, N. P. (2017). Child health in elementary school following California’s paid family leave program. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 36, 790–827.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Marsiglio, W., & Roy, K. (2012). Nurturing dads: Social initiatives for contemporary fatherhood. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  46. McClain, L., & Brown, S. L. (2017). The roles of father involvement and coparenting in relationship quality among cohabiting and married parents. Sex Roles, 76, 334–345.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0612-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McGill, B. S. (2014). Navigating new norms of involved fatherhood: Employment, fathering attitudes, and father involvement. Journal of Family Issues, 35, 1089–1106.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X14522247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McKay, L., Mathieu, S., & Doucet, A. (2016). Parental-leave rich and parental-leave poor: Inequality in Canadian labour market based leave policies. Journal of Industrial Relations, 58, 543–562.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185616643558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McKeering, H., & Pakenham, K. I. (2000). Gender and generativity issues in parenting: Do fathers benefit more than mothers from involvement in child care activities? Sex Roles, 43, 459–480.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007115415819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McLanahan, S. (2004). Diverging destinies: How children are faring under the second demographic transition. Demography, 41, 607–627.  https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2004.0033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McLanahan, S. (2009). Fragile families and the reproduction of poverty. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 621, 111–131.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716208324862.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. McLanahan, S., & Beck, A. N. (2010). Parental relationships in fragile families. Future of Children, 20, 17–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159, 56–63.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. National Partnership for Women and Families (2018). State paid family and medical leave laws, July 2018. Washington, D.C. Retrieved on February 1, 2019 from http://www.nationalpartnership.org/research-library/work-family/paid-leave/state-paid-family-leave-laws.pdf.
  55. Nepomnyaschy, L., & Waldfogel, J. (2007). Paternity leave and fathers’ involvement with their young children. Community, Work & Family, 10, 427–453.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13668800701575077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nomaguchi, K., Brown, S., & Leyman, T. M. (2017). Fathers’ participation in parenting and maternal parenting stress: Variation by relationship status. Journal of Family Issues, 38, 1132–1156.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X15623586.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. O’Brien, M. (2009). Fathers, parental leave policies, and infant quality of life: International perspectives and policy impact. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 624, 190–213.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716209334349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. O’Rand, A. M. (2006). Stratification and the life course: Life course capital, life course risks, and social inequality. In R. H. Binstock, L. K. George, S. J. Cutler, J. Hendricks, & J. H. Schulz (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (6th ed., pp. 145–162). Burlington: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  59. Pailhé, A., Solaz, A., & Tô, M. (2018). Can daddies learn how to change nappies? Evidence from a short paternity leave policy. Paris: Institut National D’études Démographiques. Retrieved on February 1, 2019 from hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01892935.
  60. Pasley, K., Petren, R. E., & Fish, J. N. (2014). Use of identity theory to inform fathering scholarship. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 6, 298–318.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pedulla, D. S., & Thébaud, S. (2015). Can we finish the revolution? Gender, work-family ideals, and institutional constraint. American Sociological Review, 80, 116–139.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122414564008.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Petts, R. J., & Knoester, C. (2018). Paternity leave-taking and father engagement. Journal of Marriage and Family, 80, 1144–1162.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12494.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Petts, R. J., & Knoester, C. (2019). Are parental relationships improved if fathers take time off of work after the birth of a child? Social Forces. Advance online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soz014.
  64. Petts, R. J., Knoester, C., & Li, Q. (2018a). Paid paternity leave-taking in the United States. Community, Work & Family. Advance online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2018.1471589.
  65. Petts, R. J., Shafer, K. M., & Essig, L. W. (2018b). Does adherence to masculine norms shape fathers’ behaviors? Journal of Marriage and Family, 80, 704–720.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Pragg, B., & Knoester, C. (2017). Parental leave usage among disadvantaged fathers. Journal of Family Issues, 38, 1157–1185.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X15623585.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Rane, T. R., & McBride, B. A. (2000). Identity theory as a guide to understanding fathers’ involvement with their children. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 347–366.  https://doi.org/10.1177/019251300021003004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Raub, A., Nandi, A., De Guzman Chorny, N., Wong, E., Chung, P., Batra, P., … Heymann, J. (2018). Paid parental leave: A detailed look at approaches across OECD countries. Los Angeles: WORLD Policy Analysis Center. Retrieved on February 1, 2019 from https://www.worldpolicycenter.org/sites/default/files/WORLD%20Report%20-%20Parental%20Leave%20OECD%20Country%20Approaches_0.pdf.
  69. Redshaw, M., & Henderson, J. (2013). Fathers engagement in pregnancy and childbirth: Evidence from a national survey. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 13, 70.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. Rege, M., & Solli, I. F. (2013). The impact of paternity leave on fathers’ future earnings. Demography, 50, 2255–2277.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-013-0233-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Rehel, E. M. (2014). When dad stays home too: Paternity leave, gender, and parenting. Gender & Society, 28, 110–132.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243213503900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Roggman, L. A., Boyce, L. K., Cook, G. A., & Cook, J. (2002). Getting dads involved: Predictors of father involvement in early head start and with their children. Infant Mental Health Journal, 23, 62–78.  https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.10004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rothbaum, F., & Weisz, J. (1994). Parental caregiving and child externalizing behavior in nonclinical samples: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 55–74.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rudman, L. A., & Mescher, K. (2013). Penalizing men who request a family leave: Is flexibility stigma a femininity stigma? Journal of Social Issues, 69, 322–340.  https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sroufe, A. L., Carlson, E., & Shulman, S. (1993). Individuals in relationships: Development from infancy through adolescence. In D. C. Funder, R. D. Parke, C. Tomlinson-Keasey, & K. Widaman (Eds.), Studying lives through time: Personality and development (pp. 315–342). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Waldfogel, J. (2006). What children need. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Williams, J. C. (2000). Unbending gender: Why family and work conflict and what to do about it. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Williams, R. (2016). Understanding and interpreting generalized ordered logit models. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 40, 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.2015.1112384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Williams, J. C., Blair-Loy, M., & Berdahl, J. L. (2013). Cultural schemas, social class, and the flexibility stigma. Journal of Social Issues, 69, 209–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Winston, P. (2014). Work family supports for low-income families: Key research findings and policy trends. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved on February 1, 2019 from https://aspe.hhs.gov/basic-report/work-family-supports-low-income-families-key-research-findings-and-policy-trends.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyBall State UniversityMuncieUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  3. 3.School of Social WorkColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations