Advertisement

Sex Roles

pp 1–18 | Cite as

Femmephobia: The Role of Anti-Femininity and Gender Policing in LGBTQ+ People’s Experiences of Discrimination

  • Rhea Ashley HoskinEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Since the 1970s social science researchers have documented the cultural devaluation of femininity and its impact on experiences of discrimination among sexual and gender minorities. Yet, despite the continued and accumulating evidence demonstrating the role of anti-femininity (or femmephobia) in these experiences, little research has specifically examined femininity as an intersecting component of discrimination. Using in-depth interviews with sexual and gender minorities (N = 38), the current study explores the intersecting role of femmephobia in experiences of discrimination. Under the global theme of “femininity as target,” 5 key subthemes were identified: femininity and passing, regulating sexualities, masculine right of access, biological determinism, and the feminine joke. Participants illuminated femmephobia as a regulatory power within LGBTQ+ communities and society at large, as well as how femininity itself operates as a target in their experiences of gender policing and discrimination. By turning attention toward femininity, the current paper provides a clearer understanding of what may possibly lay at the heart of many social issues surrounding discrimination and violence. These findings have implications for the study of social inequalities, as well as strategies for remedying the pervasive devaluation of femininity.

Keywords

Femmephobia Critical femininities Femininity Prejudice Discrimination and oppression Gender policing Femme theory Pariah femininities Gender hegemony Hegemonic femininity Emphasized femininity Femme Intersectionality 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The first author was supported by a Social Science and Humanities Research Council Doctoral Award as well as by The Soroptimist Foundation of Canada.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Research Involving Human Participants and Informed Consent

The current study was conducted in compliance with ethical standards for research involving human participants and informed consent was obtained from each participant. The Queen’s University General Research Ethics Board approved all procedures and materials for the study.

Conflict of Interest

There are no potential conflicts of interest to be addressed.

Supplementary material

11199_2019_1021_MOESM1_ESM.docx (19 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 18 kb)

References

  1. Aggarwal, S., & Gerrets, R. (2014). Exploring a Dutch paradox: An ethnographic investigation of gay men’s mental health. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 16(2), 105–119.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2013.841290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexandrowicz, C. (2017). ‘Straight-looking, straight-acting’: Countering effemiphobia in acting training. Theatre, Dance and Performance Training, 8(1), 5–18.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19443927.2016.1246381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Attwood, F. (2007). Sluts and riot grrrls: Female identity and sexual agency. Journal of Gender Studies, 16(3), 233–247.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09589230701562921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailey, M. J. (1996). Gender identity. In R. C. Savin-Williams & K. M. Cohen (Eds.), Lives of lesbians, gays and bisexuals: Children to adults (pp. 71–93). New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  5. Bailey, M. (2014). More on the origins of misogynoir. Retrieved from http://moyazb.tumblr.com/post/84048113369/more-on-the-origin-of-misogynoir.
  6. Banchefsky, S., Westfall, J., Park, B., & Judd, C. M. (2016). But you don’t look like a scientist! Women scientists with feminine appearance are deemed less likely to be scientists. Sex Roles, 75(3–4), 95–109.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0586-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benevedes, J. M. (2015). The juice girl: The lost feminine gay male psyche. JungJournal: Culture & Psyche, 9(4), 7–25.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19342039.2015.1086954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berger, J. (1972). The nude. In J. Berger (Ed.), Ways of seeing (pp. 45–64). New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  9. Bishop, C. J., Kiss, M., Morrison, T. G., Rushe, D. M., & Specht, J. (2014). The association between gay men’s stereotypic beliefs about drag queens and their endorsement of hypermasculinity. Journal of Homosexuality, 61(4), 554–567.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2014.865464.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Blair, K. L. (2017). Did secretary Clinton lose to a ‘basket of deplorables’? An examination of islamophobia, homophobia, sexism and conservative ideology in the 2016 US presidential election. Psychology & Sexuality, 8(4), 334–355.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2017.1397051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blair, K. L., & Hoskin, R. A. (2015). Experiences of femme identity: Coming out, invisibility and femmephobia. Psychology & Sexuality, 6(3), 229–244.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2014.921860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blair, K. L., & Hoskin, R. A. (2016). Contemporary understandings of femme identities and related experiences of discrimination. Psychology & Sexuality, 7(2), 101–115.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2015.1053824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blair, K. L., & Hoskin, R. A. (2018). Transgender exclusion from the world of dating: Patterns of acceptance and rejection of hypothetical trans dating partners as a function of sexual and gender identity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. Advance online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518779139.
  14. Bordo, S. (1993). Unbearable weight: Feminism, western culture and the body. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  15. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.  https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Brownmiller, S. (1984). Femininity. New York: Fawcett Columbine.Google Scholar
  18. Brushwood Rose, C., & Camilleri, A. (2002). Brazen femme: Queering femininity. Vancouver, BC: Arsenal Pulp.Google Scholar
  19. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Butler, J. (1997). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. In K. Conboy, N. Medina, & S. Stanbury (Eds.), Writing on the body: Female embodiment and feminist theory (pp. 401–418). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Carbado, D. W., Williams Crenshaw, K., Mays, V. M., & Tomlinson, B. (2013). Intersectionality: Mapping the movements of a theory. Du Bois Review, 10(2), 303–312.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X13000349.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Combahee River Collective. (1983). The Combahee River collective statement. In B. Smith (Ed.), Home girls, a black feminist anthology (pp. 264–274). Kitchen Table: Women of Color Press. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  24. Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Sydney: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  25. Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender and Society, 19(6), 829–859.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205278639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Coyote, I. E., & Sharman, Z. (2011). Persistence: All ways butch and femme. Vancouver, BC: Arsenal Pulp.Google Scholar
  27. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–168 https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8.Google Scholar
  28. Dahl, U. (2017). Femmebodiments: Notes on queer feminine shapes of vulnerability. Feminist Theory, 18(1), 35–53.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700116683902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Deliovsky, K. (2008). Normative white femininity: Race, gender and the politics of beauty. Atlantis: Critical Studies in Gender, Culture & Social Justice, 33(1), 49–59 http://journals.msvu.ca/index.php?journal=atlantis&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=429&path%5B%5D=422.Google Scholar
  30. Deliovsky, K. (2010). White femininity: Race, gender & power. Halifax and Winnipeg: Fernwood Publishing.Google Scholar
  31. DeVault, M. L., & Gross, G. (2006). Feminist interviewing: Experience, talk, and knowledge. In S. M. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis (pp. 173–198). London, UK: Safe Publications.Google Scholar
  32. Donat, P., & D'Emilio, J. (1992). A feminist redefinition of rape and sexual assault: Historical foundation and change. Journal of Social Issues, 48(1), 9–22.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01154.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dyer, R. (1997). White. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Eguchi, S. (2011). Negotiating sissyphobia: A critical/interpretive analysis of one ‘femme’ gay Asian body in the heteronormative world. Journal of Men’s Studies, 19(1), 37–56.  https://doi.org/10.3149/jms.1901.37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Eguchi, S. (2015). ‘But, I ain’t your geisha!’: (re)framing the ‘femme’ gay Asian male body in the global context. In K. Sorrells & S. Sekimoto (Eds.), Globalizing intercultural communication: A reader (pp. 77–85). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Fagot, B. J. (1977). Consequences of moderate cross-gender behaviour in preschool children. Child Development, 48(3), 902–907.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1128339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Forster, E. (2017). As a woman in science, I need to conceal my femininity to be taken seriously: It’s a thesis I tested myself. It proved to be true. Vox. Retrieved from https://www.vox.com/first-person/2017/5/4/15536932/women-stem-science-feminism.
  39. Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  40. Franco, C. (2014). Shameless: The canine and the feminine in ancient Greece. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Frankenberg, R. (1993). The social construction of whiteness: White women, race matters. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gilbert, M. A. (2006). The feminist cross-dresser. In K. Scott-Dixon (Ed.), Trans/forming feminisms: Trans-feminist voices speak out (pp. 105–111). Toronto: Sumach Press.Google Scholar
  43. Ginsberg, E. (1996). Passing and the fictions of identity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1999). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  45. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Grossman, A. H., D’Augeli, A. R., Salter, N. P., & Hubbard, S. M. (2006). Comparing gender expression, gender nonconformity, and parents’ responses to female-to-male and male-to-female transgender youth. Journal of LGBT Issues in Counseling, 1(1), 41–59.  https://doi.org/10.1300/j462v01n01_04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Harry, J. (1983). Parasuicide, gender and gender deviance. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 350–361.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2136401.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Hesse-Biber, S. N. (2007). The practice of feminist in-depth interviewing. In S. Hesse-Biber & P. L. Leavy (Eds.), Feminist research practice: A primer (pp. 111–148). London, UK: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. hooks, b. (1981). Ain’t I a woman?: Black women and feminism. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
  50. hooks, b. (1992). Black looks: Race and representation. Toronto, ON: Between the Lines.Google Scholar
  51. Hoskin, R. A. (2013). Femme theory: Femininity’s challenge to western feminist pedagogies (Master’s thesis). QSpace at Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. Retrieved from https://qspace.library.queensu.ca/handle/1974/8271.
  52. Hoskin, R. A. (2017a). Femme theory: Refocusing the intersectional lens. Atlantis: Critical Studies in Gender, Culture & Social Justice, 38(1), 95–109 http://journals.msvu.ca/index.php/atlantis/article/view/4771/95-109%20PDF.Google Scholar
  53. Hoskin, R. A. (2017b). Femme interventions and the proper feminist subject: Critical approaches to decolonizing contemporary western feminist pedagogies. Cogent Social Sciences, 3(1), 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2016.1276819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hoskin, R. A. (2018). Critical femininities: The development and application of femme theory.(Unpublished dissertation). QSpace at Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. https://qspace.library.queensu.ca/handle/1974/24491.
  55. Hoskin, R. A., & Hirschfeld, K. L. (2018). Beyond aesthetics: A femme manifesto. Atlantis: Critical Studies in Gender, Culture & Social Justice, 39(1), 85–87 http://journals.msvu.ca/index.php?journal=atlantis&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=5426&path%5B%5D=pdf_59.Google Scholar
  56. Hughes, G. (2006). Encyclopedia of swearing: The social history of oaths, profanity, foul language, and ethnic slurs in the English-speaking world. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  57. Human Rights Campaign Foundation. (2017). A time to act: Fatal violence against transgender people in 2017. Retrieved from http://assets2.hrc.org/files/assets/resources/A_Time_To_Act_2017_REV3.pdf.
  58. Hunter, B. (2019). Bruce McArthur: More serial killer victims across the province? Toronto Sun . Retrieved from https://torontosun.com/news/local-news/bruce-mcarthur-more-serial-killer-victims-across-the-province.
  59. Huxley, C., Clarke, V., & Halliwell, E. (2013). Resisting and conforming to the ‘lesbian look’: The importance of appearance norms for lesbian and bisexual women. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 24(3), 205–219.  https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Jewell, L. M., & Morrison, M. A. (2012). Making sense of homonegativity: Heterosexual men and women’s understanding of their own prejudice and discrimination toward gay men. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 9(4), 351–370.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2011.586098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kavanaugh, P. R. (2013). The continuum of sexual violence women’s accounts of victimization in urban nightlife. Feminist Criminology, 8(1), 20–39.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085112442979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Keeling, K. (2007). The witch’s flight: The cinematic, the black femme and the image of common sense. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kennedy, E. L., & Davis, M. D. (1993). Boots of leather, slippers of gold: The history of a lesbian community. New York: Routledge/Penguin.Google Scholar
  64. Kierski, W., & Blazina, C. (2009). The male fear of the feminine and its effects on counseling and psychotherapy. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 17(2), 155–172.  https://doi.org/10.3149/jms.1702.155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kilianski, S. E. (2003). Explaining heterosexual men’s attitudes toward women and gay men: The theory of exclusively masculine identity. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 4(1), 37–56.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.4.1.37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Kimmel, M. S. (1997). Masculinity as homophobia: Fear, shame, and silence in the construction of gender identity. In M. M. Gergen & S. N. Davis (Eds.), Toward a new psychology of gender (pp. 223–242). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. LeBlanc, L. (1999). Pretty in punk: Girls' gender resistance in a boys' subculture. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Levitt, H., Gerrish, E. A., & Hiestand, K. R. (2003). The misunderstood gender: A model of modern femme identity. Sex Roles, 48(4), 99–113.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022453304384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Levitt, H. M., Surace, F. I., Wheeler, E. E., Maki, E., Alcantara, D., Cadet, M., … Ngai, C. (2018). Drag gender: Experiences of gender for gay and queer men who perform drag. Sex Roles, 78(5–6), 367–384.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0802-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Lu, W. (2016). 8 LGBTQ activists share what “love is love” means to them in Donald Trump’s America. Bustle. Retrieved from https://www.bustle.com/p/8-lgbtq-activists-share-what-love-is-love-means-to-them-in-donald-trumps-america-7278041.
  71. McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1771–1800.  https://doi.org/10.1086/426800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. McLean, K. (2008). ‘Coming out, again’: Boundaries, identities and spaces of belonging. Australian Geographer, 39(3), 303–313.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00049180802270507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Mezzofiore, G. (2018). The Toronto suspect apparently posted about an ‘incel rebellion.’ Here’s what that means. CNN. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/25/us/incel-rebellion-alek-minassian-toronto-attack-trnd/index.html.
  74. Miller, B. (2015). ‘Dude, where’s your face?’ Self-presentation, self-description, and partner preferences on a social networking application for men who have sex with men: A content analysis. Sexuality & Culture, 19(4), 637–658.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-015-9283-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Miller, B., & Behm-Morawitz, E. (2016). “Masculine guys only”: The effects of femmephobic mobile dating application profiles on partner selection for men who have sex with men. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 176–185.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen, 16(3), 6–18.  https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/16.3.6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Myketiak, C. (2016). Fragile masculinity: Social inequalities in the narrative frame and discursive construction of a mass shooter’s autobiography/manifesto. Contemporary Social Science, 11(4), 289–303.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2016.1213414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Namaste, V. (2005). Sex change. Social change: Reflections on identity, institutions and imperialism. Toronto, ON: Women’s Press.Google Scholar
  79. Oliver, K. (1994). Womanizing Nietzsche: Philosophy’s relation to the feminine. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  80. Pain, R. (1991). Space, sexual violence and social control: Integrating geographical and feminist analyses of women’s fear of crime. Progress in Human Geography, 15(4), 415–431.  https://doi.org/10.1177/030913259101500403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Pain, R. (2001). Gender, race, age and fear in the city. Urban Studies, 38(5–6), 899–913.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980120046590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Pascoe, C. J. (2007). Dude, you’re a fag: Masculinity and sexuality in high school. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  83. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  84. Pfeffer, C. A. (2014). ‘I don’t like passing as a straight woman’: Queer negotiations of identity and social group membership. American Journal of Sociology, 120(1), 1–44.  https://doi.org/10.1086/677197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Pickens, C., & Braun, V. (2018). “Stroppy bitches who just need to learn how to settle”? Young single women and norms of femininity and heterosexuality. Sex Roles, 79(7–8), 431–448.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0881-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Pope, C., Ziebland, S., & Mays, N. (2000). Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative data. British Medical Journal, 320, 114–116.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Rich, A. (1980). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian experience. Signs, 5(4), 631–660.  https://doi.org/10.1086/493756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Sanchez, F. J., & Vilain, E. (2012). ‘Straight-acting gays’: The relationship between masculine consciousness, anti-effeminacy, and negative gay identity. Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 41, 111–119.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-9912-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Schippers, M. (2007). Recovering the feminine other: Masculinity, femininity, and gender hegemony. Theory and Society, 36(85), 85–102.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-007-9022-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Segarra, L.M. (2017). The 10 deadliest mass shootings in modern U.S. history. Time. Retrieved from http://time.com/4967879/deadliest-mass-shootings-las-vegas/.
  91. Serano, J. (2007). Whipping girl: A transsexual woman on sexism and the scapegoating of femininity. Emeryville, CA: Seal Press.Google Scholar
  92. Serano, J. (2013). Excluded: Making feminist and queer movements more inclusive. Emeryville, CA: Seal Press.Google Scholar
  93. Sharpley-Whiting, T. D. (1999). Black Venus: Sexualized savages, primal fears, and primitive narratives in French. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Stone, A., & Gorga, A. (2014). Containing pariah femininities: Lesbians in the sorority rush process. Sexualities, 17(3), 348–364.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460713516336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Tanenbaum, L. (2015). I am not a slut: Slut-shaming in the age of the internet. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  96. Taywaditep, K. J. (2001). Marginalization among the marginalized: Gay men’s anti-effeminacy attitudes. Journal of Homosexuality, 42(1), 1–28.  https://doi.org/10.1300/j082v42n01_01.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Tetreault, M. A. (2001). Frontier politics: Sex, gender, and the deconstruction of the public sphere. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 26(1), 53–72.  https://doi.org/10.1177/030437540102600103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Volcano, D. L., & Dahl, U. (2008). Femmes of power: Exploding queer femininities. London, UK: Serpent’s Tail.Google Scholar
  99. Wexler, L., Robbennolt, J. K., & Murphy, C. (2018). #MeToo, Time’s up, and theories of justice. University of Illinois College of Law Legal Studies Research Paper.  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3135442.
  100. Wilson, D., & Neville, S. (2009). Culturally safe research with vulnerable populations. Contemporary Nurse, 33(1), 69–79.  https://doi.org/10.5172/conu.33.1.69.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Yavorsky, J., & Sayer, L. (2013). “Doing fear”: The influence of hetero-femininity on (trans)women’s fears of victimization. The Sociological Quarterly, 54(4), 511–533.  https://doi.org/10.1111/tsq.12038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Gender Studies & PsychologyQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations