Paternity Leave-Taking and Father Involvement among Socioeconomically Disadvantaged U.S. Fathers
In the present study, we examine the associations between the amount of time that U.S. employed fathers took off from work after the birth of a child (i.e., paternity leave-taking) and trajectories of how frequently fathers engage with their children and take responsibility for them. To do so, we analyze longitudinal data on 2109 fathers from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study, a data set that contains information from disproportionately socioeconomically disadvantaged families from large urban areas. The results indicate that, 1 year after birth, paternity leave-taking and lengths of leave are positively associated with fathers’ engagement and responsibility. In addition, paternity leave-taking is positively associated with trajectories of fathers’ responsibility over the first 5 years after birth. Lengths of paternity leave are positively associated with trajectories of fathers’ engagement. Finally, there is evidence that paternity leave-taking and lengths of leave-taking are especially likely to boost fathers’ engagement and responsibility among nonresident fathers. Overall, the findings from the present study suggest that an expansion of paternity leave-taking may encourage higher subsequent levels of father involvement—especially among nonresident fathers.
KeywordsParental leave Paternity leave Fatherhood Father involvement Father identity theory
The present research was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R03HD087875. Brianne Pragg is supported by funding from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) to the Population Research Institute at The Pennsylvania State University for Population Research Infrastructure (P2C HD041025) and Family Demography Training (T32 HD007514). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare regarding this work.
- Aumann, K., Galinsky, E., & Matos, K. (2011). The new male mystique. New York: Families and Work Institute Retrieved from http://familiesandwork.org/site/research/reports/newmalemystique.pdf.Google Scholar
- Brady, M., Stevens, E., Coles, L., Zadoroznyj, M., & Martin, B. (2017). “You can spend time… but not necessarily be bonding with them”: Australian fathers’ constructions and enactments of infant bonding. Journal of Social Policy, 46(1), 69–90. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279416000374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Edin, K., & Nelson, T. J. (2013). Doing the best I can: Fatherhood in the inner city. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Galinsky, E., Aumann, K., & Bond, J. T. (2011). Times are changing: Gender and generation at work and at home. New York: Families and Work Institute Retrieved from www.familiesandwork.org/site/research/reports/Times_Are_Changing.pdf.Google Scholar
- Harrington, B., Van Deusen, F., Fraone, J. S., Eddy, S., & Haas, L. (2014). The new dad: Take your leave. Boston College Center for Work and Family. Retrieved from https://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/centers/cwf/research/publications3/researchreports/The%20New%20Dad%202014_Take%20Your%20Leave.
- Heymann, J., & McNeill, K. (2013). Children’s chances: How countries can move from surviving to thriving. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Huerta, M. C., Adema, W., Baxter, J., Han, W., Lausten, M., Lee, R., & Waldfogel, J. (2014). Fathers’ leave and fathers’ involvement: Evidence from four OECD countries. European Journal of Social Security, 16, 308–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/138826271401600403.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Lamb, M. E., & Lewis, C. (2010). The development and significance of father-child relationships in two-parent families. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (5th ed., pp. 94–153). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Marsiglio, W., & Roy, K. (2012). Nurturing dads: Social initiatives for contemporary fatherhood. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Patnaik, A. (2018). Reserving time for daddy: The consequences of fathers’ quotas. Forthcoming in Journal of Labor Economics. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3225239.
- Petts, R. J., Knoester, C., & Li, Q. (2018). Paid paternity leave-taking in the United States. Community, Work & Family. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2018.1471589.
- Pew Research Center. (2017). Americans widely support paid family and medical leave, but differ over specific policies. Washington, DC: J. Horowitz, K. Parker, N. Graf, & G. Livingston.Google Scholar
- Pleck, J. H. (2010). Paternal involvement: Revised conceptualization and theoretical linkages with child outcomes. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (5th ed., pp. 58–93). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Society for Human Resource Management. (2015). 2015 employee benefits: An overview of employee benefits offerings in the U.S. Alexandria, VA. Retrieved from https://www.shrm.org/hr-today/trends-and-forecasting/research-and-surveys/Documents/2015-Employee-Benefits.pdf.
- Townsend, N. W. (2002). The package deal: Marriage, work, and fatherhood in men’s lives. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
- Waldfogel, J. (2006). What children need. Cambridge: Harvard University.Google Scholar