Advertisement

Sex Roles

pp 1–12 | Cite as

The Power of Sisterhood: The Moderating Role of Womanism in the Discrimination-Distress Link among Women of Color in the United States

  • Caleb ChadwickEmail author
  • Cirleen DeBlaere
Original Article
  • 59 Downloads

Abstract

Sexism and racism play an important role in the psychological well-being of Women of Color (WOC). It is important to understand how protective factors, such as womanism (an outgrowth of Black feminist thought focused on the intersectional concerns of WOC), might disrupt the link between discrimination and psychological distress. With a sample of 204 U.S. heterosexual WOC, we examined (a) the links between perceived lifetime and recent sexist events and psychological distress and (b) the potential moderating role in these relations of womanism (an intersectional feminist perspective). Further, we conducted exploratory analysis on (c) the potential moderating role of womanism in the association between racism and distress. Findings indicated that all measured forms of discrimination were significantly and positively related to psychological distress. Womanism was found to moderate the relationship between each form of discrimination and psychological distress. The links between each form of discrimination and psychological distress were significant and positive for WOC with lower levels of womanism and not significant for those with higher levels. As one of the first known studies to investigate womanism as a protective factor, and the first known to explore its role in buffering experiences of racism, findings suggest that placing discrimination experiences within a larger sociocultural context of oppression may reduce distress for WOC.

Keywords

Sex bias/sexism Race-ethnicity/focus on women of color Womanism Feminism Classism/racism/sexism Prejudice/stereotyping/discrimination 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors of the submitted manuscript have no known potential conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All research was conducted under the approval of Georgia State University’s IRB and in compliance with highest standards in ethical practice of research with human subjects.

Informed Consent

All participants completed an informed consent prior to participating in the current research.

References

  1. Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Anthias, F., & Yuval-Davis, N. (1983). Contextualising feminism: Gender, ethnic and class divisions. Feminist Review, 15(1), 62–75.  https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.1983.33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowleg, L. (2008). When black+ lesbian+ woman≠ black lesbian woman: The methodological challenges of qualitative and quantitative intersectionality research. Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 312–325.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9400-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, E. B. (1989). Womanist consciousness: Maggie Lena Walker and the independent order of Saint Luke. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 14(3), 610–633.  https://doi.org/10.1086/494526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carte, T. A., & Russell, C. J. (2003). In pursuit of moderation: Nine common errors and their solutions. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 479–501.  https://doi.org/10.2307/30036541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
  8. Collins, P. H. (1995). Symposium: On west and Fenstermaker’s “Doing difference”. Gender & Society, 9(4), 491–513.  https://doi.org/10.1177/089124395009004006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Collins, P. H. (1998). It’s all in the family: Intersections of gender, race, and nation. Hypatia, 13(3), 62–82.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1998.tb01370.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crenshaw, K. W. (1994). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. In M. A. Fineman & R. Mykitiuk (Eds.), The public nature of private violence (pp. 93–118). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Crenshaw, K. W. (1995). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics and violence against women of color. In K. Crenshaw, N. Gotanda, G. Peller, & K. Thomas (Eds.), Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement (pp. 357–383). New York: New Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cuadraz, G. H., & Uttal, L. (1999). Intersectionality and in-depth interviews: Methodological strategies for analyzing race, class, and gender. Race, Gender & Class, 6(3), 156–186.Google Scholar
  13. DeBlaere, C., & Bertsch, K. N. (2013). Perceived sexist events and psychological distress of sexual minority women of color: The moderating role of womanism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(2), 167–178.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312470436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DeBlaere, C., Brewster, M. E., Bertsch, K. N., DeCarlo, A. L., Kegel, K. A., & Presseau, C. D. (2014). The protective power of collective action for sexual minority women of color: An investigation of multiple discrimination experiences and psychological distress. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38(1), 20–32.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313493252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Downing, N. E., & Roush, K. L. (1986). From passive acceptance to active commitment: A model of feminist identity development for women. The Counseling Psychologist, 13(4), 695–709.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000085134013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Else-Quest, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (2016). Intersectionality in quantitative psychological research: II. Methods and techniques. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(3), 319–336.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316629797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fischer, A. R., & Bolton Holz, K. (2007). Perceived discrimination and women's psychological distress: The roles of collective and personal self-esteem. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54(2), 154–164.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.54.2.154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fisher, A. R., & Bolton Holz, K. (2010). Testing a model of women’s personal sense of justice, control, well-being, and distress in the context of sexist discrimination. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(3), 297–310.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01576.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Friedman, C., & Leaper, C. (2010). Sexual-minority college women’s experiences with discrimination: Relations with identity and collective action. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(2), 152–164.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01558.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Garth, P. H. (1994). A new knowledge: Feminism from an Afrocentric perspective. Thresholds in Education, 20, 8–13.Google Scholar
  21. Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59(2), 93–104.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.2.93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Green, D. E., Walkey, F. H., McCormick, I. A., & Taylor, A. J. (1988). Development and evaluation of a 21-item version of the Hopkins, symptom checklist with New Zealand and United States respondents. Australian Journal of Psychology, 40(1), 61–70.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00049538808259070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Greene, B. (2003). Foreword: Lesbian and bisexual women’s mental health. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 15(2–3), xvii–xviii.  https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v15n02_a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hancock, A. M. (2007). When multiplication doesn't equal quick addition: Examining intersectionality as a research paradigm. Perspectives on Politics, 5(1), 63–79.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592707070065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Henley, N. M., & McCarthy, W. J. (1998). Measure feminist attitudes: Problems and prospects. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22(3), 363–369.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00162.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Henley, N. M., Meng, K., O’Brien, D., McCarthy, W. J., & Sockloskie, R. J. (1998). Developing a scale to measure the diversity of feminist attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22(3), 317–348.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00158.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy, J. A., Jr., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009). Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: An overview and some recommendations. Psychological Methods, 14(1), 6–23.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014694.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. King, K. (2003). Do you see what I see? Effects of group consciousness on African American women’s attributions to prejudice. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27(1), 17–30.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.t01-2-00003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Klonoff, E. A., & Landrine, H. (1995). The schedule of sexist events: A measure of lifetime and recent sexist discrimination in women’s lives. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19(4), 439–472.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1995.tb00086.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Landrine, H., & Klonoff, E. A. (1997). Discrimination against women: Prevalence, consequences, remedies. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Landrine, H., Klonoff, E. A., Corral, I., Fernandez, S., & Roesch, S. (2006). Conceptualizing and measuring ethnic discrimination in health research. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 29(1), 79–94.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-005-9029-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee, D. L., & Ahn, S. (2013). The relation of racial identity, ethnic identity, and racial socialization to discrimination–distress: A meta-analysis of black Americans. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60(1), 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031275.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Moller, N. P., Fouladi, R. T., McCarthy, C. J., & Hatch, K. D. (2003). Relationship of attachment and social support to college students' adjustment following a relationship breakup. Journal of Counseling & Development, 81(3), 354–369.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2003.tb00262.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moradi, B., & DeBlaere, C. (2010). Women’s experiences of sexist discrimination: Review of research and directions for centralizing race, ethnicity, and culture. In H. Landrine & N. Russo (Eds.), Handbook of diversity in feminist psychology (pp. 173–210). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  35. Moradi, B., & Funderburk, J. R. (2006). Roles of perceived sexist events and perceived social support in the mental health of women seeking counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(4), 464–473.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.53.4.464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moradi, B., & Subich, L. M. (2002). Perceived sexist events and feminist identity development attitudes: Links to women’s psychological distress. The Counseling Psychologist, 30(1), 44–65.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000002301003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moradi, B., & Subich, L. M. (2003). A concomitant examination of the relations of perceived racist and the sexist events to psychological distress for African American women. The Counseling Psychologist, 31(4), 451–469.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000003031004007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mullings, L. (1997). On our own terms: Race, class, and gender in the lives of African American women. NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Nakano Glenn, E. (1999). The social construction and institutionalization of gender and race: An integrative framework. In M. M. Feree, J. Lorber, & B. B. Hess (Eds.), Revisioning gender (pp. 3–43). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Pieterse, A. L., & Carter, R. T. (2007). An examination of the relationship between general life stress, racism-related stress, and psychological health among black men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54(1), 101–109.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.54.1.101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Purdie-Vaughns, V., & Eibach, R. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 377–391.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9424-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Risman, B. J. (2004). Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism. Gender & Society, 18(4), 429–450.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243204265349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sabik, N. J., & Tylka, T. L. (2006). Do feminist identity styles moderate the relation between perceived sexist events and disordered eating? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(1), 77–84.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00264.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shields, S. A. (2008). Gender: An intersectionality perspective. Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 301–311.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9501-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Solórazano, D. G. (1998). Critical race theory, race and gender microaggressions, and the experience of Chicana and Chicano scholars. Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(1), 121–136.  https://doi.org/10.1080/095183998236926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Szymanski, D. M. (2004). Relations among dimensions of feminism and internalized heterosexism in lesbians and bisexual women. Sex Roles, 51(3–4), 145–159.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000037759.33014.55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Szymanski, D. M., & Owens, G. P. (2009). Group-level coping as a moderator between heterosexism and sexism and psychological distress in sexual minority women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33(2), 197–205.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01489.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Szymanski, D. M., & Stewart, D. N. (2010). Racism and sexism as correlates of African American Women’s psychological distress. Sex Roles, 63(3–4), 226–238.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9788-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
  50. Walker, A. (1983). In search of our mothers’ gardens. San Diego: Harcourt.Google Scholar
  51. Warner, L. (2008). A best practices guide to intersectional approaches in psychological research. Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 454–463.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9504-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Weber, L., & Parra-Medina, D. (2003). Intersectionality and women’s health: Charting a path to eliminating health disparities. In V. Demos & M. T. Segal (Eds.), Advances in gender research: Gender perspectives on health and medicine (pp. 181–230). Amsterdam: Elsevier.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1529-2126(03)07006-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Weldon, S. L. (2006). The structure of intersectionality: A comparative politics of gender. Politics & Gender, 2(2), 235–248.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X06231040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Williams, C. B. (2005). Counseling African American women: Multiple identities – Multiple constraints. Journal of Counseling and Development, 83(3), 278–283.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2005.tb00343.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vaidyanathan. (2016). Before there was Hillary Clinton, there was Shirley Chisolm. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-35057641. Accessed 17 March 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Counseling and Psychological ServicesGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations