Sex Roles

, Volume 81, Issue 1–2, pp 59–73 | Cite as

Pursuing Medicina [Medicine]: Latina Physicians and Parental Messages on Gendered Career Choices

  • Glenda M. FloresEmail author
Original Article


Prior research underscores that college-educated Latinas are hyper-segregated into highly feminized occupations and that Latino parents socialize their daughters to seek out these careers. Despite this trend, a small and growing number of Latinas are steadily entering prestigious non-traditional careers in medicine. Drawing on in-depth interviews with 20 Latina physicians of various generational backgrounds in California, I examine how Latina doctors explain the role parental messages played in their occupational trajectories. I document the fluid and often contradicting gendered expectations Latina physicians received from parents and identify three primary patterns in these messages, including: (a) fathers’ contradictory gendered expectations for their wives versus their U.S. born/raised daughters, (b) fathers and mothers’ differing messages about procuring financial and social independence from men, and (c) parental messages about sexuality. The messages that young Latinas receive vary and reflect tensions between gendered expectations for women in the immigrant parents’ home country and those available in the United States. The messages of support and resistance that Latina physicians receive from their parents regarding the pursuit of a career in medicine show how changing structural contexts—such as access and entry into prestigious non-traditional fields—rearranges gendered dynamics within Latino families.


Latina doctors Parenting Ethnicity Gender Fathers Careers Medicine 



The Hellman Fellows Program and the UC/ACCORD organization supported the present research. I wish to thank the physicians who participated in the study and the study’s undergraduate research assistants: Thalia Fabian and Yoselinda Mendoza. I am also grateful to Raul Fernández, Belinda Campos, and the anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful comments on prior drafts.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

This study was approved by the author’s Institutional Review Board. Informed consent was given by all participants.

Supplementary material

11199_2018_979_MOESM1_ESM.docx (17 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 16 kb)


  1. Abrego, L. (2014). Sacrificing families. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alfaro, E. C., Umaña-Taylor, A., & Bámanca, M. Y. (2006). The influence of academic support on Latino adolescents’ academic motivation. Family Relations, 55, 279–291.
  3. Anzaldúa, G. (1997). Movimientos de rebeldia y las culturas que traicionan [rebellious movements and the cultures they betray]. In A. Darder, R. Torres, & H. Gutierrez (Eds.), In Latinos and education (pp. 259–268). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Association of American Medical Colleges. (2014). Diversity in the physician workforce. Retrieved from
  5. Bettie, J. (2003). Women without class. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bhatt, W. (2013). Little brown woman. Gender and Society, 27, 659–680.
  7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
  8. Cantú, N. (2008). Paths to discovery. Los Angeles: UCLA Chicano Studies Research Center Press.Google Scholar
  9. Castillo-Speed, L. (1995). Latina: Women’s voices from the borderlands. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  10. Catanzarite, L., & Trimble, L. (2008). Latinos in the United States labor market. In H. Rodriguez, R. Saenz, & C. Menjivar (Eds.), In Latinas/os in the United States (pp. 149–167). Boston: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Chatfield, S. L. (2018). Considerations in qualitative research reporting: a guide for authors preparing articles for sex roles. Sex Roles, 79, 125–135.
  12. Coltrane, S., Park, R., & Adams, M. (2004). Complexity of father involvement in low-income Mexican-American families. Family Relations, 53, 179–189.
  13. Dasgupta, S. D., & DasGupta, S. (1996). Public face, private space. In N. B. Maglin & D. Perry (Eds.), Bad girls/good girls (pp. 226–243). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dill, M. J., & Salsberg, E. S. (2008). The complexities of physician supply and demand: Projections through 2025. Washington: Association of American Medical Colleges.Google Scholar
  15. Espin, O. (1999). Women crossing boundaries. New York: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
  16. Espiritu, Y. L. (2001). “We don’t sleep around like White girls do.” Signs, 26, 415–440.
  17. Espiritu, Y. L. (2003). Home bound. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Estrada, E. (2013). Changing household dynamics. Childhoods, 20, 51–65.
  19. Estrada, E., & Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. (2013). Living the third shift: Latina adolescent street vendors in Los Angeles. In N. Flores-Gonzalez, A. R. Guevarra, M. Toro-Morn, & G. Chang (Eds.), Immigrant women workers in the neoliberal age (pp.144–163). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  20. Fernández-Kelly, M.P. (1983). For we are sold. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  21. Fernández-Kelly, M.P., & García, A. M. (1997). Power surrendered, power restored. In M. Romero, P. Hondagneu-Sotelo, & V. Ortiz (Eds.), Challenging fronteras (pp. 215–228). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Flores, G. M. (2017). Latina teachers: Creating careers and guarding culture. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Flores, G. M., & Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. (2014). The social dynamics Latina college graduates into the teaching profession. Gender, Work and Organization, 21, 491–515.
  24. Galindo, R. (1996). Reframing the past in the present: Chicana teacher role identity as bridging identity. Education and Urban Society, 29, 85–102.
  25. García, L. (2012). Respect yourself, protect yourself. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  26. García-López, G. (2008). Nunca de toman en cuenta [they never take you into acccount]. Gender & Society, 22, 590–612.
  27. González-López, G. (2004). Fathering Latina sexualities: Mexican men and the virginity of their daughters. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1118–1130.
  28. González-López, G. (2005). Erotic journeys. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  29. Grijalva, C. A., & Coombs, R. H. (1997). Latinas in medicine: Stressors, survival skills, and strengths. Aztlán, 22(2), 67–88.Google Scholar
  30. Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. (1994). Gendered transitions. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  31. Kibria, N. (1993). Family tightrope. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. López, N. (2002). Hopeful girls, troubled boys. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. López, N. (2005). Homegrown: How the family does gender. In M. B. Zinn, P. Hondagneu-Sotelo, & M. Messner (Eds.), Gender through the prism of difference (pp. 447–464). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Mirande, A. (1997). Hombres y machos. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  35. Murti, L. (2012). Who benefits from the white coat? Ethnic and Racial Studies, 35, 1–19.
  36. Pinto, K., & Coltrane, S. (2009). Divisions of labor in Mexican origin and Anglo families. Sex Roles, 60, 485–495.
  37. Raffaelli, M., & Green, S. (2003). Parent-adolescent communication about sex. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 474–481.
  38. Raffaelli, M., & Ontai, L. L. (2004). Gender socialization in Latino/a families: Results from two retrospective studies. Sex Roles, 50, 287–299.
  39. Reyes, D. V. (2016). Conundrums of desire: Sexual discourses of Mexican-origin mothers. Sexuality and Culture, 20, 1020–1041.
  40. Segura, D. (1992). Chicanas in white collar jobs: “You have to prove yourself more.” Sociological Perspectives, 35, 163–182.
  41. Smith, R.C. (2005). Mexican New York. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  42. Taningco, T. M. (2008). Latinos in STEM professions (pp. 1–20, Rep.). Los Angeles: Tomas Rivera Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  43. Telles, E., & Ortiz, V. (2008). Generations of exclusion. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  44. U.S. Census Bureau. (2015). Poverty thresholds for 2015 by size of family and number of related children under 18 years. Retrieved from
  45. Vasquez, J. M. (2011). Mexican Americans across generations. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Villegas, M., & Vincent, K. M. (2005). Factors that influence the underrepresentation of Latino/a students majoring in mathematics in the state of Washington. WSU McNair Journal, 3, 114–129.Google Scholar
  47. Waters, M. C. (1996). The intersection of gender, race, and ethnicity in identity development of Caribbean American teens. In B. J. R. Leadbeater, & N. Way (Eds.), Urban adolescent girls (pp. 65–84). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Wolf, D. L. (1997). Family secrets: Transnational struggles among children of Filipino immigrants. Sociological Perspectives, 40, 457–82.
  49. Zambrana, R. E., & Hurtado, A. (2015). The magic key. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  50. Zhou, M., & Bankston, C. (1998). Growing up American. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  51. Zinn, M. B. (1979). Political familism: Toward sex role equality in Chicano families. Aztlán, 8, 13–26.Google Scholar
  52. Zinn, M. B. (2001). Insider field research in minority Communities. In R. M. Emerson (Ed.), Contemporary field research (pp. 159–166). Long Grove: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
  53. Zinn, M. B., & Eitzen, S. (2004). Diversity in families (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chicano/Latino Studies and Department of SociologyUniversity of CaliforniaIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations