Body Surveillance Predicts Men’s and Women’s Perceived Loneliness: A Serial Mediation Model
- 277 Downloads
Previous research on self-objectification mainly focuses on its influences on intrapersonal psychological distress whereas our study examined whether self-objectification would influence interpersonal distress (i.e., loneliness) and its corresponding mechanisms in a sample of American women and men recruited with MTurk. Participants’ self-objectification was indexed by their level of body surveillance, and we proposed that body surveillance would increase women’s and men’s tendency to experience shame about their body and decrease their general self-esteem, which would in turn predict their level of loneliness. A total of 373 Americans (235 women; Mdnage = 33 years-old, range = 18–77) participated in the present study, and the results provided support for the proposed theoretical model. Specifically, we found that body surveillance positively predicted people’s body shame, and body shame negatively predicted self-esteem, which in turn predicted people’s loneliness. Moreover, this mediational model was not different between men and women. These results expand the scope of investigation by incorporating male samples, and they suggest that in addition to intrapersonal consequences, self-objectification can also influence people’s interpersonal well-being. Implications were discussed.
KeywordsSelf-objectification Body surveillance Loneliness Body shame Self-esteem
The present research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC:31600916), The Ministry of Education of Humanities and Social Science Project (MOE: 16YJC630111), Guizhou Confucius Academy: The project on the relation between Yangming school of Mind and Social psychology (KXTXT201604).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
We wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication. The manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors.
All the human participants involved in this research provided their consent before they participated in this research and were fully debriefed at the end of the research.
- Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
- Cacioppo, J. T., & Hawkley, L. C. (2005). People thinking about people: The vicious cycle of being a social outcast in one’s own mind. In K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (pp. 91–108). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Cacioppo, J. T., Hawkley, L. C., Crawford, L. E., Ernst, J. M., Burleson, M. H., Kowalewski, R. B., … Berntson, G. G. (2002). Loneliness and health. Potential mechanisms. Psychosomatic Medicine, 64, 407–417. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-200205000-00005.
- Cacioppo, J. T, Hawkley, L. C., Ernst, J. M., Burleson, M., Berntson, G. G., Nouriani, B., … Spiegel, D. (2006). Loneliness within a nomological net: An evolutionary perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 1054–1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.11.007.
- Cooley, C. H. (1994). Looking-glass self. In P. Kollock & J. O’Brien (Eds.), The production of reality (pp. 266–268). Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
- Fredrickson, B., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x.Google Scholar
- Garner, D. M. (1997, January). The 1997 body image survey results. Psychology Today. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/articles/199702/body-image-in-america-survey-results.
- Holland, D., & Skinner, D. (1987). Prestige and intimacy: The cultural models behind Americans’ talk about gender types. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 78–111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Hymel, S., Rubin, K. H., Rowden, L., & LeMare, L. (1990). Children's peer relationships: Longitudinal prediction of internalizing and externalizing problems from middle to late childhood. Child Development, 61, 2004–2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1990.tb03582.x.Google Scholar
- Jung, J., & Forbes, G. B. (2007). Body dissatisfaction and disordered eating among college women in China, South Korea, and the United States: Contrasting predictions from sociocultural and feminist theories. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 381–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00387.x.Google Scholar
- Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., Ricker, D., George, J., Messick, G., Speicher, C. E., Garner, W., … Glaser, R. (1984b). Urinary cortisol levels, cellular immune competency, and loneliness in psychiatric inpatients. Psychosomatic Medicine, 46, 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-1984010000-00004.
- Kline, R. (2005). Methodology in the social sciences: Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Larson, R. G. (1999). The structure and rheology of complex fluids (Vol. 150). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Leit, R. A., Pope, H. G., & Gray, J. J. (2001). Cultural expectations of muscularity in men: The evolution of playgirl centerfolds. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 29, 90–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-108X(200101)29:1<90::AID-EAT15>3.0.CO;2-F.Google Scholar
- Lemay Jr., E. P., Clark, M. S., & Greenberg, A. (2010). What is beautiful is good because what is beautiful is desired: Physical attractiveness stereotyping as projection of interpersonal goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 339–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209359700.Google Scholar
- Lewis, M. (1995). Shame: The exposed self. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Lowery, S. E., Robinson Kurpius, S. E., Befort, C., Hull Banks, E., Sollenberger, S., … Huser, L. (2005). Body image, self-esteem, and health-related behaviors among male and female first year college students. Journal of College Student Development, 46, 612–623. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2005.0062.
- Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2.Google Scholar
- McKinley, N., & Hyde, J. (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00467.x.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2015). Mplus user's guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Noll, S. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00181.x.Google Scholar
- Olmstead, R. E., Guy, S. M., O'Mally, P. M., & Bentler, P. M. (1991). Longitudinal assessment of the relationship between self-esteem, fatalism, loneliness, and substance use. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 749–770.Google Scholar
- Park, L., & Maner, J. (2009). Does self-threat promote social connection? The role of self-esteem and contingencies of self-worth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 203–217.Google Scholar
- Peplau, L. A., & Perlman, D. (1982). Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
- Perlman, D., & Peplau, L. A. (1981). Toward a social psychology of loneliness. Personal Relationships, 3, 31–56.Google Scholar
- Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Wiseman, H. (1997). Interpersonal relatedness and self-definition in the experience of loneliness during the transition to university. Personal Relationships, 4, 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1997.tb00146.x.Google Scholar
- Yang, J. (2011). Nennu and shunu: Gender, body politics, and the beauty economy in China. Signs, 36, 333–357. 10.86/655913Google Scholar