Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 81, Issue 1–2, pp 74–86 | Cite as

Does Traditional Stereotyping of Career as Male Affect College Women’s, but Not College Men’s, Career Decision Self-Efficacy and Ultimately Their Career Adaptability?

  • Yun-Jeong Shin
  • Eun Sul LeeEmail author
  • Yumi Seo
Original Article
  • 531 Downloads

Abstract

In South Korea, strong beliefs about traditional gender roles in accordance with Confucian and patriarchic atmosphere still strongly influence daily life and the career development process. Cultural and contextual factors impact the development of gender role socialization, which influences an individual’s career decision self-efficacy (CDSE) and adaptability to manage the challenging career decision-making process. In our study, we recruited 291 South Korean undergraduate students (138 women, 153 men) and investigated how an implicit gender-career stereotyping impacts career adaptability via CDSE and whether there is a gender difference on the direct and indirect effects of implicit gender-career stereotyping on career adaptability. The Implicit Association Test (IAT) was implemented to measure implicit gender-career stereotyping. By testing a moderated mediation model, we found a mediated effect of CDSE in the link between implicit gender-career stereotyping and career adaptability in the female students. Moreover, the direct relationship between implicit gender-career stereotyping and CDSE was significant only for female students. Given the findings, practitioners and educators who work with South Korean women need to explore the degree of clients’ traditional gender role stereotyping and provide tailored interventions to increase their level of career adaptability by minimizing the negative impacts of gender role stereotyping and by increasing CDSE.

Keywords

Gender-career stereotyping Career decision self-efficacy Career adaptability Implicit association test (IAT) Gender difference 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals

The authors verify that this manuscript describes a study wherein humans were subjects, the treatment of human subjects was in accordance with established ethical guidelines and appropriate institutional approval. The research that this manuscript reports was approved by the University of Seoul IRB where the first author, Yun-Jeong Shin, is affiliated.

Informed Consent

The authors verify that every participant for a study that this manuscript describes provided written informed consent. In prior to give informed consent, all participants were provided with detailed information of study. Written information about the study includes research purpose and procedures, potential risks and benefits of participation, confidentiality, and compensation and highlighted voluntary participation.

References

  1. Ahn, S. S., Kim, I. S., Kang, H. R., & Park, K. H. (2016). Development of a production guideline for broadcasting programs aimed towards spreading of egalitarian culture. Seoul: Korean Women’s Development Institute. Retrieved from https://www.nkis.re.kr:4445/subject_view1.do?otpId=KWDI00049411&otpSeq=0&eoSeq=0.Google Scholar
  2. Akhter, M. (April, 2018). Members build confidence, portfolio of experience that help them stand out to employers. Retrieved from https://www.ucdavis.edu/majors/blog/exploring-options/female-majority-clubs.
  3. Ashmore, R. A., Del Boca, F. K., & Bilder, S. M. (1995). Construction and validation of the Gender Attitude Inventory, a structured inventory to assess multiple dimensions of gender attitudes. Sex Roles, 32, 753–785.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01560188.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.  https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221129.n6.Google Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.  https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.35-1826.Google Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1.Google Scholar
  7. Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children's aspirations and career trajectories. Child Development, 72(1), 187–206.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00273.Google Scholar
  8. Banse, R., Seise, J., & Zerbes, N. (2001). Implicit attitudes towards homosexuality: Reliability, validity, and controllability of the IAT. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48(2), 145–160.  https://doi.org/10.1026//0949-3946.48.2.145.Google Scholar
  9. Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2005). The burden of benevolent sexism: How it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(5), 633–642.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.270.Google Scholar
  10. Bearman, S. B., Korobov, M., & Thorne, A. (2009). The fabric of internalized sexism. Journal of Integrated Social Sciences, 1, 10–47. Retrieved from http://www.jiss.org/documents/volume_1/issue_1/JISS_2009_1-1_10-47_Fabric_of_Internalized_Sexism.pdf.Google Scholar
  11. Betz, N. E. (1993). Toward the integration of multicultural and career psychology. The Career Development Quarterly, 42(1), 53–55.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.1993.tb00245.x.Google Scholar
  12. Betz, N. E., Klein, K. L., & Taylor, K. M. (1996). Evaluation of a short-form of career decision making self-efficacy scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 4, 47–57.  https://doi.org/10.1177/106907279600400103.Google Scholar
  13. Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1972). Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28(2), 59–78.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1972.tb00018.x.Google Scholar
  14. Chang, T. F. H. (2003). A social psychological model of women’s gender-typed occupational mobility. Career Development International, 8, 27–39.  https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430310459496.Google Scholar
  15. Chiesa, R., Massei, F., & Guglielmi, D. (2016). Career decision-making self-efficacy change in Italian high school students. Journal of Counseling & Development, 94(2), 210–224.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12077.Google Scholar
  16. Cho, S.-Y., & Min, K.-S. (2011). Differences and relationship of career identity, career decision-making self-efficacy, and career adaptability of college students. The Journal of Career Education Research, 24, 59–76. http://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/ArticleDetail/NODE02409887#.Google Scholar
  17. Chung, Y. B. (2002). Career decision-making self-efficacy and career commitment: Gender and ethnic differences among college students. Journal of Career Development, 28, 277–284.  https://doi.org/10.1177/089484530202800404.Google Scholar
  18. Clement, S. (1987). The self-efficacy expectations and occupational preferences of females andmales. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 60(3), 257–265.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1987.tb00258.x.Google Scholar
  19. Correll, S. J. (2004). Constraints into preferences; gender, status, and emerging career aspiration. American Sociological Review, 69, 93–113.  https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240406900106.Google Scholar
  20. Creed, P. A., Patton, W., & Prideaux, L.-A. (2007). Predicting change over time in career planning and career exploration for high school students. Journal of Adolescence, 30, 377–392.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.04.003.Google Scholar
  21. De Lemus, S., Moya, M., Lupiáñez, J., & Bukowski, M. (2014). Men in the office, women in the kitchen? Contextual dependency of gender stereotype activation in Spanish women. Sex Roles, 70(11–12), 468–478.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0328-6.Google Scholar
  22. Eddleston, K. A., Veiga, J. F., & Powell, G. N. (2006). Explaining sex differences in managerial career satisfier preferences: The role of gender self-schema. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 437–445.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.437.Google Scholar
  23. Enders, C. K. (2001). A primer on maximum likelihood algorithms available for use with missing data. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 128–141.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem0801_7.Google Scholar
  24. Evans, C. D., & Diekman, A. B. (2009). On motivated role selection: Gender beliefs, distant goals, and career interest. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 235–249.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01493.x.Google Scholar
  25. Gilbert, L. A. (1993). Two careers/one family. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Ginevra, M. C., & Nota, L. (2017). Occupational gender stereotypes and problem-solving in Italian adolescents. British Journal of Guidance and Counseling, 45(3), 312–327.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2015.106384.Google Scholar
  27. Gottfredson, L. S. (1996). Gottfredson's theory of circumscription and compromise. In D. Brown & L. Brooks (Eds.), Career choice and development (pp. 179–232). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  28. Greenhaus, J. H., & Simon, W. E. (1971). Career salience, work values, and vocational indecision. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 10, 104–110.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(77)90047-1.Google Scholar
  29. Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.102.1.4.Google Scholar
  30. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.74.6.1464.Google Scholar
  31. Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197–216.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197.Google Scholar
  32. Guan, P., Capezio, A., Restubog, S. L. D., Read, S., Lajom, J. A. L., & Li, M. (2016). The role of traditionality in the relationships among parental support, career decision-making self-efficacy, and career adaptability. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 94, 114–123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.02.018.Google Scholar
  33. Guay, F. (2005). Motivations underlying career decision-making activities: The career decision-making autonomy scale (CDMAS). Journal of Career Assessment, 13, 77–97.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072704270297.Google Scholar
  34. Gushue, G. V. (2006). The relationship of ethnic identity, career decision-making self-efficacy and outcome expectations among Latino/a high school students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 85–95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.03.002.Google Scholar
  35. Hackett, G., & Betz, N. E. (1981). A self-efficacy approach to the career development of women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 18(3), 326–339.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(81)90019-1.Google Scholar
  36. Hackett, G., & Betz, N. E. (1989). An exploration of the mathematics self-efficacy/mathematics performance correspondence. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 261–273.  https://doi.org/10.2307/749515.Google Scholar
  37. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12050.Google Scholar
  38. Holland, J. L. (1985). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice.Google Scholar
  39. Hou, C., Wu, L., & Liu, Z. (2014). Effect of proactive personality and decision-making self-efficacy on career adaptability among Chinese graduates. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 42(6), 903–912.  https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2014.42.6.903.Google Scholar
  40. Huffpost. (2016, November). An epic battle between feminism and deep-seated misogyny is under way in South Korea.. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/feminism-misogyny-south-korea_us_5818dc1be4b0f96eba963f6c.
  41. Jin, M-S. (2018, May). Whose side is gender equity center in College? Hankyoreh. Retrieved from http://h21.hani.co.kr/arti/special/special_general/45336.html.
  42. Jodry, J., & Armstrong, K. (2010). The personal is political: Using feminist theory as a model of career and employment counseling. Retrieved from https://counselingoutfitters.com/vistas/vistas10/Article_06.pdf.
  43. Joo, Y. J., Go, K. Y., & Jung, Y. (2015). The effect of positive affect, social support, career decision-making self-efficacy, outcome expectancy, and career preparation behavior on career satisfaction of university students. The Journal of Career Education Research, 28(3), 65–83. https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002037049.Google Scholar
  44. Keifer, A. K., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2005). Implicit stereotypes and women’s math performance: How implicit gender-math stereotypes influence women’s susceptibility to stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 825–832.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.08.004.Google Scholar
  45. Kim, D. I. (2001). Sociology of sex. Seoul, South Korea: Moonumsa Publisher.Google Scholar
  46. Kim, J.-S. (2007). How are occupational aspirations formed among female college students? Focusing on recognitions of the gender division of labor in the home and labor market and coping strategies. Korean Journal of Sociology of Education, 17, 77–108. Retrieved from https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001046638.Google Scholar
  47. Kim, K.-O., & Ha, J.-Y. (2007). Portrayal of women’s image in the prime-time TV commercials on three Korean TV networks. Korean Journal of Journalism and Communication Studies, 51(2), 453–478. Retrieved from https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001249328.Google Scholar
  48. Kim, M. Y., Lee, J. S., & Lee, J. H. (2015). Relationship among types of decision making, career decision-making self efficacy, career motivation, and career indecision of college students. The Korean Journal of Youth Counseling, 23(2), 1–19. Retrieved from https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002053441.Google Scholar
  49. Kray, L. J., Howland, L. H., Russell, A. G., & Jackman, L. M. (2017). The effects of implicit gender role theories on gender system justification: Fixed beliefs strengthen masculinity to preserve the status quo. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 98–115.  https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000124.Google Scholar
  50. Lee, S. G., & Baek, S. G. (2013). Gender representations in TV advertisements and their ideological implications a semiotic and discourse analysis on “electronic rice cooker” ads. The Korean Journal of Advertising and Public Relations, 15(4), 197–237. Retrieved from https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001817219.Google Scholar
  51. Lee, K. H., & Lee, H. J. (2000). The effect of career self-efficacy in predicting the level of career attitude maturity of college students. The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 12(1), 127–136. http://kiss.kstudy.com/thesis/thesis-view.asp?key=1755414.Google Scholar
  52. Lee, S. H., & Lee, E. J. (2009). The influence of gender role identity, and gender role attitude on career decision-making self-efficacy and career maturity. The Korean Journal of Counseling, 10(4), 2137–2151.  https://doi.org/10.15703/kjc.10.4.200912.2137.Google Scholar
  53. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027.Google Scholar
  54. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(1), 36–49.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0167.47.1.36.Google Scholar
  55. Maume Jr., D. (1999). Occupational segregation and the career mobility of white men and women. Social Forces, 77, 1433–1459.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3005882.Google Scholar
  56. McWhirter, E. H. (1997). Perceived barriers to education and career: Ethnic and gender differences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50(1), 124–140.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1995.1536.Google Scholar
  57. McWhirter, E. H., Hackett, G., & Bandalos, D. L. (1998). A causal model of the educational plans and career expectations of Mexican American high school girls. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45(2), 166–181.Google Scholar
  58. Meade, A. W. (2009). FreeIAT: An open-source program to administer the implicit association test. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 643.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621608327803.Google Scholar
  59. Moya, M., Expósito, F., & Ruiz, J. (2000). Close relationships, gender, and career salience. Sex Roles, 42, 825–846.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007094232453.Google Scholar
  60. Na, S. W., & Ahn, K. Y. (2018, April). Men-women hiring ratio 4:1…. Gender discrimination hiring in Hana Bank. Kukminilbo. Retrieved from http://news.kmib.co.kr/article/view.asp?arcid=0923927177.
  61. Nam, S. K., Yang, E., Lee, S. M., Lee, S. H., & Seol, H. (2010). A psychometric evaluation of the career decision self-efficacy scale with Korean students: A Rasch model approach. Journal of Career Development, 38(2), 147–166.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845310371374.Google Scholar
  62. Nevill, D. D., & Super, D. (1988). Career maturity and commitment to work in university students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31, 139–151.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(88)90011-5.Google Scholar
  63. Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., Lindner, N. M., Devos, T., Ayala, A., … Greenwald, A. G. (2009). National differences in gender–science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10593–10597.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0809921106.
  64. O'Brien, K. M., & Fassinger, R. E. (1993). A causal model of the career orientation and career choice of adolescent women. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 40(4), 456–469.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0167.40.4.456.Google Scholar
  65. Park, G. (2016). Married women’ use of discretion time and time management. Seoul: Seoul Foundation of Women & Family. Retrieved from https://www.seoulwomen.or.kr/c2/sub1_1_view.jsp?regNo=1482195991110.Google Scholar
  66. Park, Y.-H. (2017). The effect of career decision making self-efficacy and career maturity on university students’ job seeking anxiety. The Journal of Career Education Research, 30(2), 41–61. http://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/ArticleDetail/NODE07226666.Google Scholar
  67. Porfeli, E. J., Lee, B., Vondracek, F. W., & Weigold, I. K. (2011). A multi-dimensional measure of vocational identity status. Journal of Adolescence, 34(5), 853–871.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.02.001.Google Scholar
  68. Rudman, L. A., & Phelan, J. E. (2010). The effect of priming gender roles on women’s implicit gender beliefs and career aspiration. Social Psychology, 41, 192–202.  https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000027.Google Scholar
  69. Savickas, M. L. (2002). Career construction: A developmental theory of vocational behavior. In D. Brown & Associates (Eds.), Career choice and development (4th ed., pp. 149–205). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Retrieved from http://www.borbelytiborbors.extra.hu/ZSKF/CareerDevelopment.pdf#page=170.Google Scholar
  70. Savickas, M. L. (2013). Career construction theory and practice. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (2nd ed., pp. 42–70). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  71. Savickas, M. L., & Porfeli, E. J. (2012). Career adapt-abilities scale: Construction, reliability, and measurement equivalence across 13 countries. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(3), 661–673.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.01.011.Google Scholar
  72. Shin, Y.-J. (2013). Exploration of the relationship among calling, career decision-making self-efficacy, intrinsic motivation, and career adaptability. Korean Journal of Counseling, 14, 209–226.  https://doi.org/10.15703/kjc.14.1.201302.209.Google Scholar
  73. Su, R., Rounds, J., & Armstrong, P. I. (2009). Men and things, women and people: A meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 859–884.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017364.Google Scholar
  74. Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(2), 199–214.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.68.2.199.Google Scholar
  75. Tak, J. (1995). Occupational sex stereotypes among Korean college students: Differences based on sex, sex-role type, and culture. Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 161–174. Retrieved from http://dl.nanet.go.kr/SearchDetailView.do?cn=KINX2003103354&sysid=uci.Google Scholar
  76. Tak, J. (2012). Career adapt-abilities scale—Korea form: Psychometric properties and construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(3), 712–715.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.01.008.Google Scholar
  77. Taylor, K. M., & Betz, N. E. (1983). Applications of self-efficacy theory to the understanding and treatment of career indecision. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 22(1), 63–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(83)90006-4.Google Scholar
  78. The Diplomat. (2016, August). The struggles of South Korea’s working women: How structural barriers impede South Korean women from joining the workforce. Retrieved from http://thediplomat.com/2016/08/the-struggles-of-south-koreas-working-women.
  79. Thoits, P. A. (1991). On merging identity theory and stress research. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 101–112.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2786929.Google Scholar
  80. Weitzman, L. M., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1993). Employed mothers: Labor force profiles and diverse lifestyles. In J. Frankel (Ed.), The employed mothers and the family context. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  81. White, M. J., & White, G. B. (2006). Implicit and explicit occupational gender stereotypes. Sex Roles, 55(3–4), 259–266.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9078-z.Google Scholar
  82. World Economic Forum. (2015). The global gender gap report 2015. In World Economic Forum (Ed.), The global gender gap report (pp. 1–391). Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum. Retrieved from http://reports.weforum.org/global-gender-gap-report-2015/economies/.Google Scholar
  83. Yang, N. M. (2008). The mediating effect of career self-efficacy on the relationship of sex-role stereotype and career aspiration in middle school students. The Korean Journal of Counseling, 9(2), 537–550.  https://doi.org/10.15703/kjc.9.2.200806.537.Google Scholar
  84. Yon, K. J., Choi, W., & Goh, M. (2012). Career maturity growth curve and sex-role stereotypes of Korea adolescents. Journal of Career Development, 40(3), 203–222.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845312445515.Google Scholar
  85. Yonhapnews. (2016, March). 74% of companies in South Korea prefer to hire male rather than female. Retrieved from http://www.yonhapnews.co.kr/bulletin/2016/03/15/0200000000AKR20160315057900003.HTML?input=1195m.
  86. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82–91.  https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of EducationUniversity of SeoulSeoulRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of EducationSejong UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.College of Business AdministrationUniversity of SeoulSeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations