Advertisement

Sex Roles

pp 1–21 | Cite as

Meanings of Bodily and Sexual Expression in Youth Sexting Culture: Young Women’s Negotiation of Gendered Risks and Harms

  • Emily Setty
Original Article

Abstract

The present paper explores how young people construct gendered social meanings and cultural norms surrounding sexual and bodily expression in youth sexting culture. Previous research suggests youth sexting is a gendered phenomenon in which young men are able to seek social capital through sexting, whereas young women are subject to social shaming and harassment. Drawing upon findings from group and one-to-one interviews with 41 young people aged 14–18, I show how constructs of risk, shame, and responsibility operated along gendered lines. Young people attributed agency and legitimacy to young men’s sexual practices, whereas young women were disempowered, denied legitimacy, and tasked with managing gendered risks of harm in youth sexting culture. I discuss how young women negotiated and navigated risk and shame and, in some instances, made space for safe, pleasurable sexting experiences despite and within these narratives. The accounts of two young women, who shared experiences sexting and social shaming, are presented to show some of the ways young women make sense of social meanings and cultural norms on individual and interpersonal levels. I conclude that challenging gendered harm requires a (re)legitimisation of feminine sexuality and bodily expression away from narratives of risk and shame.

Keywords

Sexting Young people Gender Sexism Shame 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to extend my sincere gratitude to the young people who participated in my research and who spoke about their perceptions and practices so openly and honestly. I am also grateful to the gatekeepers who took their time to facilitate the research. I also thank my supervisors Professor Jon Garland and Dr. Laura Harvey who supported the project. My work was supported by the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at the University of Surrey through a Faculty Studentship.

Funding

This research was funded by a faculty studentship from the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at the University of Surrey.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

The research involved human participants and informed consent was obtained from all participants in the study. This study was reviewed and received a Favourable Ethical Opinion from the University of Surrey Ethics Committee.

Supplementary material

11199_2018_957_MOESM1_ESM.docx (35 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 34 kb)

References

  1. Albury, K. (2013). Young people, media and sexual learning: Rethinking representation. Sex Education, 13(1), 32–44.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2013.767194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albury, K., & Crawford, K. (2012). Sexting, consent and young people's ethics: Beyond Megan's story. Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 26(3), 463–473.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2012.665840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Albury, K., Crawford, K., Bryon, P., & Matthews, B. (2013). Young people and sexting in Australia: Ethics, representation and the law, final report. Sydney: Australian Research Centre for Creative Industries and Innovation, University of New South Wales. Retrieved from: http://www.cci.edu.au/sites/default/files/Young_People_And_Sexting_Final.pdf.Google Scholar
  4. Allen, L., & Ingram, T. (2015). Bieber fever’: Girls, desire and the negotiation of girlhood sexualities. In E. Renold, J. Ringrose, & R. D. Egan (Eds.), Childhood, sexuality and sexualisation (pp. 141–158). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Angrove, G. (2015). “She’s such a slut!” The sexualised cyberbullying of teen girls and the education law response. In J. Bailey & V. Steeves (Eds.), eGirls, eCitizens (pp. 307–336). Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
  6. Associated Press and MTV. (2009). Digital abuse survey. Retrieved from http://www.athinline.org/MTV-AP_Digital_Abuse_Study_Full.pdf.
  7. Bailey, J., & Mouna, H. (2011). The gendered dimensions of sexting: Assessing the applicability of Canada’s child pornography provision. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 23(2), 405–441.  https://doi.org/10.3138/cjwl.23.2.405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bay-Cheng, L. Y. (2003). The trouble of teen sex: The construction of adolescent sexuality through school-based sexuality education. Sex Education: Sexuality, Society and Learning, 3(1), 61–74.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1468181032000052162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bay-Cheng, L. Y. (2015). The agency line: A neoliberal metric for appraising young women’s sexuality. Sex Roles, 73(7), 279–291.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0452-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beres, M. A. (2007). ‘Spontaneous’ sexual consent: An analysis of sexual consent literature. Feminism and Psychology, 17(1), 93–108.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353507072914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.Google Scholar
  12. Bond, E. (2010). The mobile phone = bike shed? Children, sex and mobile phones. New Media and Society, 13(4), 587–604.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810377919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown, L. M., & Gilligan, C. (1992). Meeting at the crossroads: Women’s psychology and girls’ development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burkett, M. (2015). Sex(t) talk: A qualitative analysis of young adults’ negotiations of the pleasures and perils of sexting. Sexuality and Culture, 19(4), 835–863.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-015-9295-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burman, M. J., Batchelor, S. A., & Brown, J. A. (2001). Researching girls and violence: Facing the dilemmas of fieldwork. British Journal of Criminology, 41(3), 443–459.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/41.3.443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chalfen, R. (2009). “It’s only a picture”: Sexting, “smutty” snapshots and felony charges. Visual Studies, 24(3), 258–268.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860903309203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Charmaz, K. (1990). Discovering chronic illness: Using grounded theory. Social Science and Medicine, 30(11), 1161–1172.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(90)90256-R.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Charmaz, K. (2014a). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  19. Charmaz, K. (2014b). Grounded theory in global perspective: Reviews by international researchers. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(9), 1074–1084.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414545235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cooper, K., Quayle, E., Jonsson, L., & Svedin, C. G. (2016). Adolescents and self-taken sexual images: A review of the literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 55(Part B), 706–716.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.10.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Correa, S., & Petchesky, R. P. (1994). Reproductive and sexual rights: A feminist perspective. Physis Revista de Saude Colevita, 6(1–2), 147–177.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-73311996000100008.Google Scholar
  22. Coy, M., Kelly, L., Elvines, F., Garner, M., & Kanyeredzi, A. (2013). “Sex without consent, I suppose that is rape”: How young people in England understand sexual consent. London: Office of the Children’s Commissioner.Google Scholar
  23. Crofts, T., Lee, M., McGovern, A., & Milivojevic, S. (2015). Sexting and young people. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Curtis, K., Roberts, H., Copperman, J., Downie, A., & Liabo, K. (2004). ‘How come I don’t get asked no questions?’ Researching ‘hard to reach’ children and teenagers. Children and Family Social Work, 9(2), 167–175.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2004.00304.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dobson, A. S., & Ringrose, J. (2015). Sext education: Pedagogies of sex, gender and shame in the schoolyards of tagged and exposed. Sex Education, 16(1), 8–21.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2015.1050486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Döring, N. (2014). Consensual sexting among adolescents: Risk prevention through abstinence education or safer sexting? Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 8(1), article 9.  https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2014-1-9
  27. Draper, N. R. A. (2012). Is your teen at risk? Discourses of adolescent sexting in United States television news. Journal of Children and Media, 6(2), 221–236.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2011.587147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Egan, R. D., & Hawkes, G. L. (2008). Endangered girls and incendiary objects: Unpacking the discourse on sexualisation. Sexuality and Culture, 12(4), 291–311.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-008-9036-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Englander, E. (2012). Low risk associated with most teenage sexting: A study of 617 18-year-olds. Bridgewater: Massachusetts Aggression Reduction Centre (MARC), Bridgewater State College. Retrieved from http://webhost.bridgew.edu/marc/SEXTING%20AND%20COERCION%20report.pdf.Google Scholar
  30. Fine, M. (1988). Sexuality, schooling, and adolescent females: The missing discourse of desire. Harvard Educational Review, 58(1), 29–54.  https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.58.1.u0468k1v2n2n8242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fine, M., & McClelland, S. I. (2006). Sexuality education and desire: Still missing after all these years. Harvard Educational Review, 76(3), 297–338.  https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.76.3.w5042g23122n6703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Frosh, S., Phoenix, A., & Pattman, R. (2002). Young masculinities: Understanding boys in contemporary society. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gavey, N. (2012). Beyond “empowerment”? Sexuality in a sexist world. Sex Roles, 66(11–12), 718–724.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0069-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love & eroticism in modern societies. Cambridge: Polity Press in association with Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
  35. Gill, R. (2007). Critical respect: The difficulties and dilemmas of agency and ‘choice’ for feminism (a reply to Duits and van Zoonen). European Journal of Women’s Studies, 14(1), 69–80.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506807072318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gill, R. (2012). Media, empowerment and the ‘sexualisation of culture’ debates. Sex Roles, 66(11/12), 736–745.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0107-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gillepsie, A. A. (2013). Adolescents, sexting and human rights. Human Rights Law Review, 13(4), 623–643.  https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngt032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Goffman, E. (1959). Presentation of the self. New York: Anchor Books, Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc.Google Scholar
  39. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Inc.Google Scholar
  40. Hardin, R. (2006). Trust. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  41. Harris, A., Aapola, S., & Gonick, M. (2000). Doing it differently: Young women managing heterosexuality in Australia, Finland and Canada. Journal of Youth Studies, 3(4), 373–388.  https://doi.org/10.1080/713684386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Harris, A., Davidson, J., Letourneau, E., Paternite, C., & Miofsky, K. T. (2013). Building a preventative framework to address teen “sexting” behaviours. US Department of Justice. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/grants/244001.pdf. Accessed 10 Dec 2014.
  43. Hasinoff, A. A. (2014). Blaming sexualisation for sexting. Girlhood Studies, 7(1), 102–120.  https://doi.org/10.3167/ghs.2014.070108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hasinoff, A. A. (2015). Sexting panic: Rethinking criminalization, privacy, and consent. Urbana, Chicago and Springfield: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  45. Herriot, L., & Hiseler, L. E. (2015). Documentaries on the sexualization of girls: Examining slut-shaming, victim blaming and what’s being left off screen. In E. Renold, J. Ringrose, & R. D. Egan (Eds.), Childhood, sexuality and sexualisation (pp. 289–304). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Holland, J., Ramazanoglu, C., Sharpe, S., & Thomson, R. (1998). The male in the head: Young people, heterosexuality and power. London: The Tufnell Press.Google Scholar
  47. Huberman, M., & Miles, M. B. (2002). The qualitative researcher’s companion. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jackson, S., & Scott, S. (2010). Theorizing sexuality. Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Johansson, T. (2012). Transformation of sexuality. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  50. Jonsson, L. S., Bladh, M., & Priebe, G. (2015). Online sexual behaviours among Swedish youth: Associations to background factors, behaviours and abuse. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 24(10), 1245–1260.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-015-0673-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Karaian, L. (2012). Lolita speaks: “Sexting,” teenage girls and the law. Crime Media Culture, 8(1), 57–73.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659011429868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Karaian, L. (2014). Policing sexting: Responsibilisation, respectability and sexual subjectivity in child protection/crime prevention responses to teenagers’ digital sexual expression. Theoretical Criminology, 18(3), 282–299.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480613504331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Karaian, L., & Van Meyl, K. (2015). Reframing risqué/risky: Queer temporalities, teenage sexting and freedom of expression. Laws, 4(1), 18–36.  https://doi.org/10.3390/laws4010018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. King, N., & Horrocks, C. (2010). Interviews in qualitative research. London: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  55. Klettke, B., Hallford, D. J., & Mellor, D. J. (2014). Sexting prevalence and correlates: A systematic literature review. Clinical Psychology Review, 34(1), 44–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2013.10.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Lamb, S., & Peterson, Z. D. (2012). Adolescent girls’ sexual empowerment: Two feminists explore the concept. Sex Roles, 66(11), 703–712.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9995-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Laverty, L. (2016). Shame, disgust and the moral economies of young women’s sexual health in the North of England. In P. Kelly & J. Pike (Eds.), Neo-liberalism and austerity: The moral economies of young people’s health and wellbeing (pp. 179–195). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  58. Lee, M., Crofts, T., Salter, M., Milivojevic, S., & McGovern, A. (2013). ‘Let’s get sexting’: Risk, power, sex and criminalisation in the moral domain. International Journal for Crime and Justice, 2(1), 35–49.  https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.v2i1.89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lenhart, A. (2009). Teens and sexting: How and why minor teens are sending sexually suggestive nude or nearly nude images via text messaging. Washington, DC: Pew Research Centre. Retrieved from http://pewresearch.org/assets/pdf/teens-andsexting.pdf.Google Scholar
  60. Levy, A. (2005). Female chauvinist pigs: Women and the rise of raunch culture. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  61. Lippman, J. R., & Campbell, S. W. (2014). Damned if you do, damned if you don't… if you're a girl: Relational and normative contexts of adolescent sexting in the United States. Journal of Children and Media, 8(4), 371–386.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2014.923009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Livingstone, S., & Third, A. (2017). Children and young people’s rights in the digital age: An emerging agenda. New Media and Society, 19(5), 657–670.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816686318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lunceford, B. (2008). The walk of shame: A normative description. ETC. A Review of General Semantics, 65(4), 319–329.Google Scholar
  64. Marwick, A., & boyd, d. (2014). Networked privacy: how teenagers negotiate context in social media. New Media and Society, 16(7), 1051–1067.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814543995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. McClelland, S. I., & Fine, M. (2008). Rescuing a theory of adolescent sexual excess: Young women and wanting. In A. Harris (Ed.), Next wave cultures: Feminism, subcultures, activism (pp. 83–102). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  66. McGeeney, E. (2013). What is good sex?: Young people, sexual pleasure and sexual health services (Unpublished thesis). The Open University, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  67. McGraw, J. M. (2013). Sexting unleashed: the social phenomenon according to youth sexters. Dissertations and Theses, Paper 1491. Retrieved from http://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds/1491.
  68. Moran-Ellis, J. (2012). Sexting, intimacy and criminal acts: Translating teenage sexualities. In P. Johnson & D. Dalton (Eds.), Policing sex (pp. 115–132). Abingdon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  69. National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy & CosmoGirl.com. (2008). Sex and tech: Results from a survey of teens and young adults. Retrieved from http://www.thenationalcampaign.org/sextech/pdf/sextech_summary.pdf.
  70. Neilsen, S., Paasonen, S., & Spisak, S. (2015). ‘Pervy role-play and such’: Girls’ experiences of sexual messaging online. Sex Education, 15(5), 472–485.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2015.1048852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. O'Sullivan, L. F., & Allegeier, E. R. (1998). Feigning sexual desire: Consenting to unwanted sexual activity in heterosexual dating relationships. The Journal of Sex Research, 35(3), 234–243.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499809551938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Papacharissi, Z., & Gibson, P. L. (2011). Fifteen minutes of privacy: Privacy, sociality, and publicity on social network sites. In S. Trempte & L. Reinecke (Eds.), Privacy online: Perspectives on privacy and self-disclosure in the social web (pp. 75–90). Dordrecht, London and New York: Springer Heidelberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Phippen, A. (2012). Sexting: An exploration of practices, attitudes and influences. London: NSPCC and UK Safer Internet Centre. Retrieved from http://www.nspcc.org.uk/globalassets/documents/research-reports/sexting-report-2012.Google Scholar
  74. Powell, A. (2010). Sex, power and consent: Youth culture and the unwritten rules. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Probyn, E. (2004). Everyday shame. Cultural Studies, 18(2/3), 328–349.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0950238042000201545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Probyn, E. (2005). Shame in the habitus. The Sociological Review, 52(s2), 224–248.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00533.x.Google Scholar
  77. Raby, R. (2007). Across a great gulf? Conducting research with adolescents. In A. L. Best (Ed.), Representing youth: Methodological issues in critical youth studies (pp. 39–59). New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  78. Renold, E. (2016). A young people’s guide to making positive relationships matter. Cardiff University, Children’s Commissioner for Wales, NSPCC Cymru, Welsh Government, Welsh Women’s Aid. Retrieved from https://www.nspcc.org.uk/services-and-resources/research-and-resources/2016/agenda-young-peoples-guide-positive-relationships/.
  79. Renold, E., & Ringrose, J. (2011). Schizoid subjectivities? Re-theorising teen girls’ sexual cultures in an era of ‘sexualisation’. Journal of Sociology, 47(4), 389–409.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783311420792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Ringrose, J., & Dobson, A. (2015). Sext education: Pedagogies of sex, gender and shame in the schoolyards of Tagged and Exposed. Sex Education, 16(1), 8–21.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2015.1050486.Google Scholar
  81. Ringrose, J., & Harvey, L. (2015). "BBM is like match.com": Social networking and the digital mediation of teen’s sexual cultures? In J. Bailey & V. Steeves (Eds.), eGirls, eCitizens: Putting technology theory, policy & education into dialogue with girls' and young women's voices (pp. 199–227). Canada: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
  82. Ringrose, J., Gill, R., Livingstone, S., & Harvey, L. (2012). A qualitative study of children, young people and ‘sexting’: A report prepared for the NSPCC. London: NSPCC. Retrieved from https://www.nspcc.org.uk/globalassets/documents/researchreports/qualitative-study-children-young-people-sexting-report.pdf.Google Scholar
  83. Rollins, J. (2015). Sexting cyberchildren: Gender, sexuality, and childhood in social media and law. Sexuality and Culture, 19(1), 57–71.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-014-9243-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Rosenthal, D., Gifford, S., & Moore, S. (1998). Safe sex or safe love: Competing discourses? AIDS Care, 10(1), 35–47.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540129850124569.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Rupp, H. A., & Wallen, K. (2008). Sex differences in response to visual sexual stimuli: A review. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37(2), 206–218.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9217-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Salter, M. (2015). Privates in the online public: Sex(ting) and reputation on social media. New Media and Society, 18(11), 2723–2739.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815604133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Scheff, T. J. (2003). Shame in self and society. Symbolic Interaction, 26(2), 239–262.  https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2003.26.2.239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Schwalbe, M., Godwin, S., Holden, D., Schrock, D., Thompson, S., & Wolkomir, M. (2000). Generic processes in the reproduction of inequality: An interactionist analysis. Social Forces, 79(2), 419–452.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2675505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Simpson, B. (2013). Challenging childhood, challenging children: Children’s rights and sexting. Sexualities, 16(5/6), 690–709.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460713487467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Skeggs, B. (2004). Class, self and culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  91. Strassberg, D. S., Rullo, J. E., & Mackaronis, J. E. (2014). The sending and receiving of sexually explicit cell phone photos (“sexting”) while in high school: One college’s students’ retrospective reports. Computers in Human Behaviour, 41, 177–183.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Tolman, D. L. (2012). Female adolescents, sexual empowerment and desire: A missing discourse of gender inequity. Sex Roles, 66(11/12), 746–757.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0122-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Tolman, D. L., Anderson, S. M., & Belmonte, K. (2015). Mobilizing metaphor: Considering complexities, contradictions and contexts in adolescent girls’ and young women’s sexual agency. Sex Roles, 73(7), 298–310.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0510-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Walker, S. J. (2012). Sexting and young people: A qualitative study (Unpublished masters thesis). University of Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved from https://minervaaccess.unimelb.edu.au/bitstream/handle/11343/37683/287493_SJW%20thesis%207-11-12.pdf?sequence=1.
  95. Wolak, J., Finkelhor, D., Walsh, W., & Treitman, L. (2018). Sextortion of minors: Characteristics and dynamics. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 62(1), 72–79 https://doi.org.uk/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.08.014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Wood, M., Barter, C., Stanley, N., Aghtaie, N., & Larkins, C. (2015). Images across Europe: The sending and receiving of sexual images and associations with interpersonal violence in young people’s relationships. Children and Youth Services Review, 59, 149–160.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.11.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2014). “Sexting” and its relation to sexual activity and sexual risk behaviour in a national survey of adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55(6), 757–764.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.07.012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Arts and Social SciencesUniversity of SurreySurreyUK

Personalised recommendations