Sex Roles

, Volume 81, Issue 1–2, pp 16–33 | Cite as

Accusers Lie and Other Myths: Rape Myth Acceptance Predicts Judgments Made About Accusers and Accused Perpetrators in a Rape Case

  • Kathryn R. KlementEmail author
  • Brad J. Sagarin
  • John J. Skowronski
Original Article


Previous research results have yielded a consistent link between rape myth acceptance and sexual assault victim blaming: Individuals reporting higher levels of rape myth acceptance also report higher levels of victim blaming. In four studies we explored whether the presentation of rape-myth confirming information or rape-myth debunking information might moderate these tendencies. In these studies, U.S. undergraduates (97 in Study 1, 84 in Study 2, 98 in Study 3, and 116 in Study 4) read scenarios of a heterosexual sexual assault case and were randomly assigned to a control condition, a rape myth confirmation condition, or a rape myth debunking condition; they also reported the extent to which they endorsed or accepted rape myths. Rape myth acceptance robustly correlated with judgments made about accusers and accused rapists regardless whether the accuser/accused pairing was female/male (Studies 1 and 2) or male/female (Studies 3 and 4). For example, those who most strongly endorsed rape myths were also likely to disbelieve accusers. There were few instances indicating that the presentation of rape myth confirming information or rape myth debunking information moderated these effects. This lack of moderation occurred regardless of whether the information came from trial lawyers or from expert witnesses in the case. The relative impotence of the information presentations could be due to several factors (e.g., entrenched nature of rape myth acceptance, psychological reactance, timing and strength of manipulation), and we suggest ideas for how to overcome this relative impotence in future research.


Rape Rape myth acceptance Sexual violence Victim blaming 



We would like to thank Kristen Myers for her conceptual input and support. Some of the findings reported here were presented at the January 2017 Society for Personality and Social Psychology Meeting.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

The authors acknowledge that none has any conflict of interest regarding this manuscript.

Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals

All research studies were subject to approval and oversight by the Institutional Review Board at Northern Illinois University.

Informed Consent

All participants were given and affirmed informed consent prior to participating in this research.

Supplementary material

11199_2018_950_MOESM1_ESM.docx (29 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 29 kb)


  1. Angelone, D. J., Mitchell, D., & Grossi, L. (2015). Men's perceptions of an acquaintance rape: The role of relationship length, victim resistance, and gender role attitudes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 2278–2303. Scholar
  2. Black, M. C., Basile, K. C., Breiding, M. J., Smith, S. G., Walters, M. L., Merrick, M. T., … Stevens, M. R. (2011). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2010 summary report. Retrieved from
  3. Bless, H., & Schwarz, N. (2010). Mental construal and the emergence of assimilation and contrast effects: The inclusion/exclusion model. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 42, pp. 319–373). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  4. Bohner, G., & Dickel, N. (2011). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 391–417. Scholar
  5. Bolton, K. H., & DiLalla, D. L. (2007). Men's fear of unintentional rape: Measure development and psychometric evaluation. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 8, 201–214. Scholar
  6. Borgida, E., & Nisbett, R. E. (1977). The differential impact of abstract vs. concrete information on decisions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 7, 258–271. Scholar
  7. Brehm, S. S. (1981). Psychological reactance and the attractiveness of unobtainable objects: Sex differences in children’s responses to an elimination of freedom. Sex Roles, 7, 937–949. Scholar
  8. Breiding, M. J., Smith, S. G., Basile, K. C., Walters, M. L., Chen, J., & Merrick, M. T. (2014). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization–National Intimate Partner and sexual violence survey, United States, 2011. Surveillance Summaries, 63, 1–18. Retrieved from Scholar
  9. Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Edwards, K. M., Turchik, J. A., Dardis, C. M., Reynolds, N., & Gidycz, C. A. (2011). Rape myths: History, individual and institutional-level presence, and implications for change. Sex Roles, 65, 761–773. Scholar
  11. Eyssel, F., & Bohner, G. (2011). Schema effects of rape myth acceptance on judgments of guilt and blame in rape cases: The role of perceived entitlement to judge. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 1579–1605. Scholar
  12. Frese, B., Moya, M., & Megias, J. L. (2004). Social perception of rape: How rape myth acceptance modulates the influence of situational factors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 143–161. Scholar
  13. Gemberling, T. M., & Cramer, R. J. (2014). Expert testimony on sensitive myth-ridden topics: Ethics and recommendations for psychological professionals. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 45, 120–127. Scholar
  14. Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029–1046. Scholar
  15. Hale, M. (1847). The history of the pleas of the crown (1st American ed., Vol. 1). Philadelphia: Robert H. Small.Google Scholar
  16. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hogarth, R. M., & Einhorn, H. J. (1992). Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 1–55. Scholar
  18. Holz, K. B., Fischer, A. R., & Daood, C. J. (2018). The role of men’s beliefs in shaping their response to a sexual violence prevention program. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 19, 308–313. Scholar
  19. Klement, K. R. (2017). Women lie and other myths: How rape myths impact attributions of blame in a rape case (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). DeKalb: Northern Illinois University.Google Scholar
  20. Klement, K. R. (2018, April). Expectations of resistance to sexual assault: Female vs. male victims. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern psychological association, Chicago.Google Scholar
  21. Kovera, M. B., Gresham, A. W., Borgida, E., Gray, E., & Regan, P. C. (1997). Does expert psychological testimony inform or influence juror decision making? A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 78–191.Google Scholar
  22. Krahe, B., Temkin, J., Bieneck, S., & Berger, A. (2008). Prospective lawyers' rape stereotypes and schematic decision-making about rape cases. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 14, 461–479. Scholar
  23. Krakauer, J. (2015). Missoula: Rape and the justice system in a college town. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  24. Lakens, D. (2017). Equivalence tests: A practical primer for t tests, correlations, and meta-analyses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 355–362. Scholar
  25. Li, A., & Bagger, J. (2007). The balanced inventory of desirable responding (BIDR): A reliability generalization study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 525–544. Scholar
  26. Lisak, D., Gardinier, L., Nicksa, S. C., & Cote, A. M. (2010). False allegations of sexual assault: An analysis of ten years of reported cases. Violence Against Women, 16, 1318–1334. Scholar
  27. Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133–164. Scholar
  28. Lonsway, K. A., Banyard, V. L., Berkowitz, A. D., Gidycz, C. A., Katz, J. L., Ross, M. P., … Edwards, D. (2009). Rape prevention and risk reduction: Review of the research literature for practitioners. VAWnet. Retrieved from
  29. Mallenbaum, C., Ryan, P., & Puente, M. (2018, April 27). A complete list of the 60 Bill Cosby accusers and their reactions to the guilty verdict. Retrieved from
  30. Malone, N. (2015, July 26). “I’m no longer afraid”: 35 women tell their stories about being assaulted by Bill Cosby, and the culture that wouldn’t listen. Retrieved from
  31. McKimmie, B. M., Masser, B. M., & Bongiorno, R. (2014). What counts as rape? The effect of offense prototypes, victim stereotypes, and participant gender on how the complainant and defendant are perceived. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 2273–2303. Scholar
  32. McMahon, S., & Farmer, G. L. (2011). An updated measure for assessing subtle rape myths. Social Work Research, 35, 71–81. Scholar
  33. Melanson, P. S. K. (1999). Belief in male rape myths: A test of two competing theories. Retrieved from
  34. Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2, 175–220. Scholar
  35. Parrott, C. T., Neal, T. M. S., Wilson, J. K., & Brodsky, S. L. (2015). Differences in expert witness knowledge: Do mock jurors notice and does it matter? Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 43, 69–81.Google Scholar
  36. Paul, L. A., Kehn, A., Gray, M. J., & Salapska-Gelleri, J. (2014). Perceptions of, and assistance provided to, a hypothetical rape victim: Differences between rape disclosure recipients and nonrecipients. Journal of American College Health, 62, 426–433. Scholar
  37. Rape Abuse, and Incest National Network. (2016). The criminal justice system: Statistics.
  38. Sheldon, J. P., & Parent, S. L. (2002). Clergy's attitudes and attributions of blame toward female rape victims. Violence Against Women, 8, 233–256. Scholar
  39. Sleath, E., & Bull, R. (2012). Comparing rape victim and perpetrator blaming in a police officer sample: Differences between police officers with and without special training. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 646–665. Scholar
  40. Sleath, E., & Bull, R. (2015). A brief report on rape myth acceptance: Differences between police officers, law students, and psychology students in the United Kingdom. Violence and Victims, 30, 136–147. Scholar
  41. Suarez, E., & Gadalla, T. M. (2010). Stop blaming the victim: A meta-analysis on rape myths. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 2010–2035. Scholar
  42. Sussenbach, P., Eyssel, F., & Bohner, G. (2013). Metacognitive aspects of rape myths: Subjective strength of rape myth acceptance moderates its effects on information processing and behavioral intentions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28, 2250–2272. Scholar
  43. Taschler, M., & West, K. (2017). Contact with counter-stereotypical women predicts less sexism, less rape myth acceptance, less intention to rape (in men) and less projected enjoyment of rape (in women). Sex Roles, 76, 473–484. Scholar
  44. Temkin, J., & Krahe, B. (2008). Sexual assault and the justice gap: A question of attitude. Portland: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  45. Turchik, J. A., & Edwards, K. M. (2012). Myths about male rape: A literature review. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 13, 211–226. Scholar
  46. van der Bruggen, M., & Grubb, A. (2014). A review of the literature related to rape victim blaming: An analysis of the impact of observer and victim characteristics on attribution of blame in rape cases. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19, 523–531. Scholar
  47. Vladutiu, C. J., Martin, S. L., & Macy, R. J. (2011). College- or university-based sexual assault prevention programs: A review of program outcomes, characteristics, and recommendations. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 12, 67–86. Scholar
  48. Whatley, M. A. (2005). The effect of participant sex, victim dress, and traditional attitudes on causal judgments for marital rape victims. Journal of Family Violence, 20, 191–200. Scholar
  49. Will, G. F. (2014, June 6). George Will: Colleges become the victims of progressivism. Retrieved from

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyNorthern Illinois UniversityDeKalbUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyBemidji State UniversityBemidjiUSA

Personalised recommendations