Advertisement

What about the Male Victims? Exploring the Impact of Gender Stereotyping on Implicit Attitudes and Behavioural Intentions Associated with Intimate Partner Violence

Abstract

Although intimate partner violence (IPV) is considered stereotypically as a gendered phenomenon, empirical evidence contradicts such gender asymmetry in reported rates of victimisation and perpetration. The current research explored the impact of stereotype priming on implicit attitudes associated with IPV victimisation (Study 1) and perpetration (Study 2), and further examined behavioural intentions associated with hypothetical gendered scenarios of IPV. Participants recruited in the United Kingdom were primed with either stereotype congruent, incongruent or no information about IPV victimisation (Study 1, n = 122) or perpetration rates (Study 2, n = 101). They then completed an Implicit Association Test and reported their subjective norms, self-efficacy, behavioural intentions, and outcome expectancies pertaining to different scenarios depicting gendered IPV. Findings indicate that priming an incongruent stereotype did not impact significantly on implicit or explicit attitudes toward IPV. Gendered scenarios were found to be influential on explicit attitudes, with IPV less likely to be identified toward male victims and considered more acceptable compared to when the victim was female. Moreover, individuals reported feeling more capable and likely to intervene in an act of IPV when the victim was female compared to male, were more likely to report such an incident, and anticipated greater outcomes. These findings highlight the need for an inclusive research approach that recognises men’s victimisation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 199

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

References

  1. Addis, M. E., & Mahalik, J. R. (2003). Men, masculinity, and the contexts of help seeking. American Psychologist, 58, 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.1.5.

  2. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control (pp. 11–39). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

  3. Ajzen, I. (1987). Attitudes, traits, and actions: Dispositional prediction of behavior in personality and social psychology. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. l–63). New York: Academic Press.

  4. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.

  5. Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 453–474.

  6. Ambady, N., Paik, S. K., Steele, J., Owen-Smith, A., & Mitchell, J. P. (2004). Deflecting negative self-relevant stereotype activation: The effects of individuation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 401–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2003.08.003.

  7. Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651–680. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.651.

  8. Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in real world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8, 291–322. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.8.4.291.

  9. Archer, J. (2006). Cross-cultural differences in physical aggression between partners: A social-role analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1002_3.

  10. Armitage, C., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471–499. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164939.

  11. Bates, E. A. (2017, November). Hidden victims: Men and their experiences of domestic violence. Paper presented at ManKind initiative conference, London, UK.

  12. Bates, E. A. (2018). Contexts for women’s aggression against men. In: T. Shackelford, V. Weekes-Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_901-1.

  13. Bates, E. A., & Graham-Kevan, N. (2016). Is the presence of control related to help-seeking behavior? A test of Johnson’s assumptions regarding sex-differences and the role of control in intimate partner violence. Partner Abuse, 7, 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.7.1.3.

  14. Bates, E. A., Graham-Kevan, N., & Archer, J. (2014). Testing predictions from the male control theory of men’s partner violence. Aggressive Behaviour, 40, 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21499.

  15. Bates, E. A., Graham-Kevan, N., Bolam, L. T., & Thornton, A. J. V. (2017). A review of domestic violence perpetrator programs in the UK. Partner Abuse, 8, 3–46. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.8.1.3.

  16. Blair, I. V., & Banaji, M. R. (1996). Automatic and controlled processes in stereotype priming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1142–1163. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-/3514.70.6.1142.

  17. Bookwala, J., Frieze, I. H., Smith, C., & Ryan, K. (1992). Predictors of dating violence: A multivariate analysis. Violence and Victims, 7, 297–311.

  18. Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106, 676–713. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.676.

  19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011). National intimate partner and sexual violence survey: 2010 summary report. Atlanta: Author.

  20. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.

  21. de Groot, J., & Steg, L. (2006). Impact of transport pricing on quality of life, acceptability, and intentions to reduce car use: An exploratory study in five European countries. Journal of Transport Geography, 14(6), 463–470.

  22. Dijksterhuis, A., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). The perception-behavior expressway: Automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1–40). London: Academic Press.

  23. Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy. London: Open Books.

  24. Douglas, E. M., & Hines, D. A. (2011). Helpseeking experiences of men who sustain intimate partner violence: An overlooked population and implications for practice. Journal of Family Violence, 26, 473–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-011-9382-4.

  25. Drijber, B. C., Reijnders, U. J. L., & Ceelen, M. (2013). Male victims of domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 28, 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-012-9482-9.

  26. Dutton, D. (2006). The gender debate and the feminist paradigm. In D. G. Dutton (Ed.), Rethinking domestic violence (pp. 109–129). Vancouver: UBS Press.

  27. Dutton, D. G., & Nicholls, T. L. (2005). The gender paradigm in domestic violence research and theory: Part 1 – The conflict of theory and data. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 680–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2005.02.001.

  28. Eagly, A. H., & Crowley, M. (1986). Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 283–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.100.3.283.

  29. Erickson, K. A., Jonnson, M., Langile, J. I., & Walsh, Z. (2017). Victim gender, rater attitudes, and rater violence history influence perceptions of intimate partner violence. Violence and Victims, 32, 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-15-00086.

  30. Felson, R. B. (2002). Violence and gender reexamined. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

  31. Felson, R. B., & Feld, S. L. (2009). When a man hits a woman: Moral evaluations and reporting of violence to the police. Aggressive Behavior, 35, 477–488. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20323.

  32. Felson, R. B., & Paré, P. (2005). The reporting of domestic violence and sexual assault by nonstrangers to the police. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 597–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00156.x.

  33. Fisher, C. (2013). Changed and changing gender and family roles and domestic violence in African refugee background communities post-settlement in Perth, Australia. Violence Against Women, 19, 833–847. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801213497535.

  34. Forscher, P. S., Lai, C. K., Axt, J., Ebersole, C. R., Herman, M., Devine, P. G., & Nosek, B. A. (2018, July 13). A meta-analysis of change in implicit bias. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/dv8tu; https://psyarxiv.com/dv8tu/. Accessed 15 May 2018.

  35. Galdas, P. M., Cheater, F., & Marshall, P. (2005). Men and health help-seeking behaviour: Literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 49, 616–623. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03331.x.

  36. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491.

  37. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464.

  38. Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197.

  39. Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and using the implicit association test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015575.

  40. Harris, R. J., & Cook, C. A. (1994). Attributions about spouse abuse: It matters who the batterers and victims are. Sex Roles, 30, 553–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01420802.

  41. Hines, D. A., Brown, J., & Dunning, E. (2007). Characteristics of callers to the domestic abuse helpline for men. Journal of Family Violence, 22(2), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-006-9052-0.

  42. Hodell, E. C., Wasarhaley, N. E., Rose Lynch, K., & Golding, J. M. (2014). Mock juror gender biases and perceptions of self-defense claims in intimate partner homicide. Journal of Family Violence, 29, 495–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-014-9609-2.

  43. Hogan, K. (2016). Mens experiences of female-perpetrated intimate partner violence: A qualitative exploration (unpublished thesis). University of the West of England. Retrieved from http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/28618.

  44. Ialongo, C. (2017). The logic of equivalence testing and its use in laboratory medicine. Biochemia medica: Biochemia medica, 27(1), 5–13.

  45. Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 283–294. https://doi.org/10.2307/353683.

  46. Johnson, M. P. (2006). Conflict and control: Gender symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 12, 1003–1018. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801206293328.

  47. Kindermann, H. (2017). Priming and context effects of banner ads on consumer based brand equity: A pilot study. In F. H. Nah & C. H. Tan (Eds.), HCI in business, government and organizations. Supporting business. HCIBGO 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 10294). https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-58484-3_5#citeas. Accessed 15 May 2018.

  48. Lai, C. K., Marini, M., Lehr, S., Cerruti, C., Shin, J. E., Joy-Gaba, J., … Nosek, B. A. (2014). Reducing implicit racial preferences: I. A comparative investigation of 17 interventions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1765–1785.

  49. Lakens, D. (2017). Equivalence tests: A practical primer for t tests, correlations, and meta-analyses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 355–362.

  50. Lakens, D., Smell, A., & Isager, P. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1, 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963.

  51. Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000225.

  52. Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Misra, T. A., Selwyn, C., & Rohling, M. L. (2012). Rates of bidirectional versus unidirectional intimate partner violence across samples, sexual orientations, and race/ethnicities: A comprehensive review. Partner Abuse, 3, 199–230. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.3.2.199.

  53. Lerner, M. J. (1977). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. Journal of Personality, 45, 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1977.tb00591.x.

  54. Lövestad, S., Löve, J., Vaez, M., & Krantz, G. (2017). Prevalence of intimate partner violence and its association with symptoms of depression: A cross-sectional study based on a female population sample in Sweden. BMC Public Health, 17, 335. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4222y.

  55. Macrae, C. N., Stangor, C., & Hewstone, M. (1996). Stereotypes and stereotyping. London: Guilford Press.

  56. McCarrick, J., Davis-McCabe, C., & Hirst-Winthrop, S. (2016). Men’s experiences of the criminal justice system following female perpetrated intimate partner violence. Journal of Family Violence, 31(2), 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-015-9749-z.

  57. McCarthy, R. J., Hartnett, J. L., Header, J. D., Scherer, C. R., Wood, S. E., Nichols, A. L., … Walker, W. R. (2018). An investigation of abstract construal on impression formation: A multi-lab replication of McCarthy and Skowronski (2011). International Review of Social Psychology, 31, 15. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.133.

  58. Menard, K. S., Anderson, A. L., & Godboldt, S. M. (2009). Gender differences in intimate partner recidivism: A 5-year follow up. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854808325905.

  59. Nelson, T. D. (2009). Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination. New York: Psychology Press.

  60. Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2005). Understanding and using the implicit association test: II. Method variables and construct validity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 166–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271418.

  61. Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., Lindner, N. M., Devos, T., Ayala, A., ... Greenwald, A. G. (2009). National differences in gender–science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10593–10597.

  62. Nosek, B. A., Hawkins, C. B., & Frazier, R. S. (2012). Implicit social cognition: From measures to mechanisms. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 152–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.005.

  63. Office for National Statistics. (2015). Chapter 4: Violent crime and sexual offences- Intimate personal violence and serious sexual assault. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20160105160709/http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171776_394500.pdf.

  64. Rhodes, R. E., Jones, L. W., & Courneya, K. S. (2002). Extending the theory of planned behavior in the exercise domain: A comparison of social support and subjective norm. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 73, 193–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2002.10609008.

  65. Rohmer, O., & Louvet, E. (2012). Implicit measures of the stereotype content associated with disability. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 732–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02087.x.

  66. Santana, M. C., Raj, A., Decker, M. R., Marche, A. L., & Silverman, J. G. (2006). Masculine gender roles associated with increased sexual risk and intimate partner violence perpetration among young adult men. Journal of Urban Health, 83, 575–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-006-9061-6.

  67. Scarduzio, J. A., Carlyle, K. E., Lockwood Harris, K., & Savage, M. W. (2017). “Maybe she was provoked”: Exploring gender stereotypes about male and female perpetrators of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 23, 89–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216636240.

  68. Seelau, S., & Seelau, E. (2005). Gender-role stereotypes and perceptions of heterosexual, gay and lesbian domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 20, 363–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-005-7798-4.

  69. Sorenson, S. B., & Taylor, C. A. (2005). Female aggression toward male intimate partners: An examination of social norms in a community-based sample. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 78–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00170.x.

  70. Sugarman, D., & Frankel, S. L. (1996). Patriarchal ideology and wife-assault: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Family Violence, 11, 13–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02333338.

  71. Sylaska, K. M., & Walters, A. S. (2014). Testing the extent of the gender trap: College students’ perceptions of and reactions to intimate partner violence. Sex Roles, 70, 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0344-1.

  72. Terry, D. J., & O’Leary, J. E. (1995). The theory of planned behaviour: The effects of perceived behavioral control and self-efficacy. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 199–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1995.tb01058.x.

  73. Terry, D. J., Hogg, M. A., & White, K. M. (1999). The theory of planned behaviour: Self-identity, social identity and group norms. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 225–244.

  74. Walsh, J., Spangaro, J., & Soldatic, K. (2015). Global understandings of domestic violence. Nursing & Health Sciences, 17, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12197.

  75. Welch, W. W., & Barlau, A. N. (2013). Addressing survey nonresponse issues: Implications for ATE principal investigators, evaluators, and researchers. Retrieved from http://www.colorado.edu/ibs/decaproject/pubs/Survey%20nonresponse%20issues%20Implications%20for%20ATE%20PIs%20researchers%20%20evaluators.pdf.

  76. Wheeler, S. C., & Petty, R. E. (2000). The effects of stereotype activation on behavior: A review of possible mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 797–826. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.6.797.

  77. Wheeler, S. C., Javis, B. G., & Petty, R. E. (2001). Think unto others: The self-destructive impact of negative racial stereotypes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2000.1448.

  78. Whitaker, D. J., Haileyesus, T., Swahn, M., & Saltzman, L. S. (2007). Differences in frequency of violence and reported injury between relationships with reciprocal and nonreciprocal intimate partner violence. American Journal of Public Health, 97, 941–947. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2005.079020.

  79. Williams, D. M., Anderson, E. S., & Winett, R. A. (2005). A review of the outcome expectancy construct in physical activity research. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 29, 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm2901_10.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Elizabeth A. Bates.

Ethics declarations

We confirm that the research protocol adheres to BPS and APA ethical guidelines. We do not see any potential conflicts of interests, we have adhered to ethical guidelines from our individual institutions as well as our professional bodies. We also sought and gained informed consent from participants.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 45 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bates, E.A., Kaye, L.K., Pennington, C.R. et al. What about the Male Victims? Exploring the Impact of Gender Stereotyping on Implicit Attitudes and Behavioural Intentions Associated with Intimate Partner Violence. Sex Roles 81, 1–15 (2019) doi:10.1007/s11199-018-0949-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Intimate partner violence
  • Stereotypes
  • Implicit association test
  • Gender
  • Behavioural intentions
  • Domestic violence