Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 79, Issue 5–6, pp 253–259 | Cite as

Gender-Typing of Children’s Toys: Causes, Consequences, and Correlates

  • Lisa M. Dinella
  • Erica S. Weisgram
Original Article

Abstract

Gender differences in children’s toy interests and play behaviors are large and may lead to gender differentiation of physical, cognitive, and social development among children. In this Special Issue, we gather together cutting-edge research on the factors that affect gender differences in children’s toy interests, how subtle gender-related messages affect children’s performance and behaviors, and how adults create these gender-related messages and affect children’s interests. We illustrate themes found in the current literature, but also comment on issues that need to be addressed by future research. We also identify points of intervention in which stereotypes about toys and gender differentiated play behaviors and toy interests can be reduced in an effort to promote greater diversity of children’s play.

Keywords

Gender Gender-typing Gender stereotypes Toys Play Children 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Lisa M. Dinella and Erica S. Weisgram have equal authorship of this introduction.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

This manuscript was prepared under the ethical guidelines of the American Psychological Association and the Society for Research in Child Development.

References

  1. Advertising Standards Authority. (2017). Depictions, perceptions, and harm: A report on gender stereotypes in advertising. London: Advertising Standards Authority Ltd..Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, G. M., & Hines, M. (2002). Sex differences in response to children’s toys in nonhuman primates (Cercopithecus aethiops sabaeus). Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 467–479.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00107-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Psychological Association. (2015). Guidelines for psychological practice with transgender and gender nonconforming people. American Psychologist, 70, 832–864.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036215.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Berenbaum, S. A., & Hines, M. (1992). Early androgens are related to childhood sex-typed toy preferences. Psychological Science, 3, 203–206.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00028.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boe, J. L., & Woods, R. J. (2017). Parents’ influence on infants’ gender-typed toy preferences. Sex Roles. Advance online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0858-4.
  7. Brewer, J., & Hunter, A. (1989). Multimethod research: A synthesis of styles. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, C. S. (2014). Parenting beyond pink and blue: How to raise your kids free of gender stereotypes. New York: Ten Speed Press.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, C. S., & Stone, E. A. (2018). Environmental and social contributions to children’s gender-typed toy play: The role of family, peers, and media. In E. S. Weisgram & L. M. Dinella (Eds.), Gender typing of children’s toys: How early play experiences impact development (pp. 166–198). Washington, DC: APA Books.Google Scholar
  10. Cherney, I. D. (2008). Mom, let me play more computer games: They improve my mental rotation skills. Sex Roles, 59, 776–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coyle, E. F., & Liben, L. S. (2015, March 19). Preschoolers’ mechanical learning from a STEM toy: The roles of parental guidance and gender-targeted marketing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the SRCD biennial meeting, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  12. Dinella, L. M. (2018). Research methods in studying gender and toy preferences. In E. S. Weisgram & L. M. Dinella (Eds.), Gender typing of children’s toys: How early play experiences impact development (pp. 25–61). Washington, DC: APA Books.Google Scholar
  13. Dinella, L. M., Weisgram, E. S., & Fulcher, M. (2017). Children’s gender-typed toy interests: Does propulsion matter? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(5), 1295–1305.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0901-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fulcher, M., & Hayes, A. R. (2017). Building a pink dinosaur: The effects of gendered construction toys on girls’ and boys’ play. Sex Roles. Advance online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0806-3.
  15. Golden, J. C., & Jacoby, J. W. (2017). Playing princess: Preschool girls’ interpretations of gender stereotypes in Disney Princess media. Sex Roles. Advance online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0773-8.
  16. Greene, J. C. (2008). Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology? Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2, 7–22.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807309969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grinberg, E. (2015, September 24). Let toys be toys: The case for gender-neutral marketing. CNN. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2015/09/24/living/gender-neutral-toys-marketing-feat/index.html.
  18. Haines, R. (2015, August 13). Target will stop labeling toys for boys or for girls. Good. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/08/13/target-will-stop-selling-toys-for-boys-or-for-girls-good/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.6734f3e2e2e9.
  19. Hines, M., & Davis, J. (2018). Sex hormones, particularly testosterone, and children’s gender-typed toy play. In E. S. Weisgram & L. M. Dinella (Eds.), Gender typing of children’s toys: How early play experiences impact development (pp. 130–165). Washington, DC: APA Books.Google Scholar
  20. Hofferth, S. L. (2009). Changes in American children’s time, 1997-2003. Electronic International Journal of Time Use Research, 6, 26–47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Horn, S. (2015, August 20). Target’s decision for gender-neutral signage signals bigger issues to come, Christian experts say. Christian Examiner. Retrieved from https://www.christianexaminer.com/article/targets-decision-for-gender-neutral-signage-signals-bigger-issues-to-come-christian-experts-say/49395.htm.
  22. Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. The American Psychologist, 60, 581–592.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kollmayer, M., Schultes, M., Schober, B., Hodosi, T., & Spiel, C. (2018). Parents’ judgments about the desirability of toys for their children: Associations with gender role attitudes, gender-typing of toys, and demographics. Sex Roles. Advance online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0882-4.
  24. Li, R. Y. H., & Wong, W. I. (2016). Gender-typed play and social abilities in boys and girls: Are they related? Sex Roles, 74, 399–410.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0580-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liben, L. S., & Bigler, R. S. (2002). The developmental course of gender differentiation: Conceptualizing, measuring, and evaluating constructs and pathways. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 67(2), vii–147.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5834.t01-1-00187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liben, L. S., Schroeder, K. M., Borriello, G. A., & Weisgram, E. S. (2018). Cognitive consequences of gendered toy play. In E. S. Weisgram & L. M. Dinella (Eds.), Gender typing of children’s toys: How early play experiences impact development (pp. 295–364). Washington, DC: APA Books.Google Scholar
  27. Magra, I. (2017, July 18). Britain cracking down on gender stereotypes in ads. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/18/world/europe/britain-ads-gender-stereotypes.html.
  28. Martin, C. L., & Halverson, C. F. (1981). A schematic processing model of sex typing and stereotyping in children. Child Development, 52, 1119–1134.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.ep8860414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Martin, C. L., Eisenbud, L., & Rose, H. A. (1995). Children's gender-based reasoning about toys. Child Development, 66, 1453–1471.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1131657.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30, 1771–1800.  https://doi.org/10.1086/426800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nelson, A. (2005). Children’s toy collections in Sweden – A less gender-typed country? Sex Roles, 52, 93–102.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-1196-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reich, S. M., Black, R. W., & Foliaki, T. (2017). Constructing difference: LEGO® set narratives promote stereotypic gender roles and play. Sex Roles. Advance online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0868-2.
  33. Robb, A. (2015, August 12). How gender-specific toys can negatively impact a child’s development. Women in the World. Retrieved from https://womenintheworld.com/2015/08/12/how-gender-specific-toys-can-negatively-impact-a-childs-development/.
  34. Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2003). Classifying the findings in qualitative studies. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 905–923.  https://doi.org/10.1177/049732303253488.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Shields, S. A. (2008). Gender: An intersectionality perspective. Sex Roles, 59, 301–311.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9501-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sieczkowski, C. (2015, August 11). Target angers customers with its stores’ new non-gendered policy. The Huffington Post. Retrieved from https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/target-gender-biased-signs_us_55c9ffe6e4b0923c12be0f96.
  37. Spinner, L., Cameron, L., & Calogero, R. (2018). Peer toy play as a gateway to children’s gender flexibility: The effect of (counter)stereotypic portrayals of peers in children’s magazines). Sex Roles. Advance online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0883-3.
  38. Tabuchi, H. (2015, October 27). Sweeping away gender-specific toys and labels. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/28/business/sweeping-away-gender-specific-toys-and-labels.html.
  39. Target. (2015, August 7). What’s in store: Moving away from gender-based signs. A Bullseye View. Retrieved from https://corporate.target.com/article/2015/08/gender-based-signs-corporate.
  40. Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C., & Sines, M. C. (2013). Utilizing mixed method s in psychological research. In J. A. Schinka, W. F. Velicer, & I. B. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Research methods in psychology (pp. 428–450). Hoboken: WileyGoogle Scholar
  41. Tate, C. C., Ledbetter, J. N., & Youssef, C. P. (2013). A two-question method for assessing gender categories in the social and medical sciences. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 767–776.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.690110.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Torney-Purta, J. V. (2009). International psychological research that matters for policy and practice. American Psychologist, 64, 825–837.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.64.8.825.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Weisgram, E. (2015, August 17). Now that Target won’t label toys by gender, some alternatives. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://parenting.blogs.nytimes.com/author/erica-weisgram/.
  44. Weisgram, E. S. (2016). The cognitive construction of gender stereotypes: Evidence for the dual pathways model of gender differentiation. Sex Roles, 75, 301–313.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0624-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Weisgram, E. S., & Bruun, S. T. (2018). Predictors of gender-typed toy purchases by prospective parents and mothers: The roles of childhood experiences and gender attitudes. Sex Roles. Advance online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0928-2.
  46. Weisgram, E. S., & Dinella, L. M. (Eds.). (2018a). Gender-typing of children’s toys: How early play experiences impact development. Washington, DC: APA Books.Google Scholar
  47. Weisgram, E. S., & Dinella, L. M. (2018b). Toward a greater understanding of children’s gender-typed toy play. In E. S. Weisgram & L. M. Dinella (Eds.), Gender typing of children’s toys: How early play experiences impact development (pp. 443–464). Washington, DC: APA Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Weisgram, E. S., Fulcher, M., & Dinella, L. M. (2014). Pink gives girls permission: Exploring the roles of explicit gender labels and gender-typed colors on preschool children’s toy preferences. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35, 401–409.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.06.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. White House. (2016, April 6). Breaking down gender stereotypes in media and toys so that our children can explore, learn, and dream without limits [Press release]. Retrieved from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2016/04/06/factsheet-breaking-down-gender-stereotypes-media-and-toys-so-our.
  50. Yeung, S. P., & Wong, W. I. (2018). Gender labels on gender-neutral colors: Do they affect children’s color preferences and play performance? Sex Roles. Advance online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0875-3.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology and Gender Studies ProgramMonmouth UniversityWest Long BranchUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Wisconsin-Stevens PointStevens PointUSA

Personalised recommendations