On the Prowl: Examining the Impact of Men-as-Predators and Women-as-Prey Metaphors on Attitudes that Perpetuate Sexual Violence
A common metaphor used to describe heterosexual relationships frames men as predators and women as prey. The present work assessed potential consequences of these metaphoric portrayals. Participants read a heterosexual dating scenario that did or did not metaphorically frame the situation in predator and prey terms. Using a U.S. college undergraduate sample of 120 women and 82 men in Study 1, exposure to these metaphors led to greater rape myth acceptance among men (but not among women). Using a broader sample of 76 women and 72 men via MTurk, Study 2 replicated these results and also found metaphor exposure led to greater rape myth acceptance and rape proclivity. Furthermore, a mediation analysis indicated that men exposed to these metaphors were more likely to accept rape myths, which in turn predicted their self-reported greater rape proclivity. Such results demonstrate the harmful outcomes that can result from describing romantic interactions where men are the predators and women are the prey.
KeywordsAnimalization Dehumanization Metaphors Predator Prey Sexual aggression Rape myth acceptance
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, in any part of the research process.
Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Abrams, D., Viki, G. T., Masser, B., & Bohner, G. (2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.168.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baker, R. (1981). “Pricks” and “chicks”: A plea for “persons.” In R. Baker & F. Elliston (Eds.), Philosophy and sex (pp. 45–64). New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
- Bar-Tal, D., & Hammack, P. L. (2012). Conflict, delegitimization, and violence. In L. R. Tropp & L. R. Tropp (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of intergroup conflict. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199747672.013.0003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bartneck, C., Duenser, A., Moltchanova, E., & Zawieska, K. (2015). Comparing the similarity of responses received from studies in Amazon’s mechanical Turk to studies conducted online and with direct recruitment. PLoS One, 10(4), e0121595. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121595.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Bock, J., Burkley, M., & Byrd-Craven, J. (2017). Hunting for you: Examining individual differences in implicit associations of women as prey and men as predators (Unpublished master’s thesis). Department of Psychology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK.Google Scholar
- Bohner, G., Reinhard, M.-A., Rutz, S., Sturm, S., Kerschbaum, B., & Effler, D. (1998). Rape myths as neutralizing cognitions: Evidence for a causal impact of anti-victim attitudes on men's self-reported likelihood of raping. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(2), 257–268. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199803/04)28:2<257::AID-EJSP871>3.0.CO;2-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Burt, M. R. (1978). Attitudes supportive of rape in American culture. In House Committee on Science and Technology; Subcommittee on Domestic and International Scientific Planning, Analysis and Cooperation; Research Into Violent Behavior: Sexual Assaults (Eds.), Hearing, 95 th Congress, 2nd session, January 10–12, 1978 (pp. 277–322). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women's lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gilbert, M. (1987). The holocaust: A history of the Jews of Europe during the second world war. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Halliday, M. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
- Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1994). Rape myths. In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18(2), 133–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb00448.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Maass, M., Arcuri, L., & Suitner, C. (2014). Shaping intergroup relations through language. In T. Holtgraves (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 157–176). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199838639.013.036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Malamuth, N. M. (1981). Rape proclivity among males. Journal of Social Issues, 37(4), 138–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1981.tb01075.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Maroon 5. (2014). Animals. On V [CD]. Santa Monica, CA: Interscope Records.Google Scholar
- Ortner, S. (1974). Is female to male as nature is to culture? In M. Z. Rosaldo & L. Lamphere (Eds.), Woman, culture, and society (pp. 68–87). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Rodríguez, I. L. (2009). Of women, bitches, chickens and vixens: Animal metaphors for women in English and Spanish. Cultura, Lenguaje y Representación/Culture, Language and Representation, 7, 77–100.Google Scholar
- Sanghani, R. (2014). Maroon 5, stop trivializing stalking. Women aren’t “prey.” Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-life/11138129/Maroon-5-stop-trivialising-stalking.-Women-arent-prey.html.
- Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (1998). Prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence against Women Survey. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED434980.pdf.
- Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2006). Extent, nature, and consequences of rape victimization: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice & Center for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar