A Short-Term Longitudinal Exploration of the Impact of TV Exposure on Objectifying Attitudes Toward Women in Early Adolescent Boys
- 516 Downloads
The present study aimed to examine the relationships over time between television viewing (music and tween TV) and boys’ endorsement of sexualized gender roles, that is, views of women as sex objects and men as sexually dominant, as well as a tendency to objectify women’s bodies. As an additional question, we were interested in how parental socialization to gender roles related to these pathways. A sample of 496 Belgian boys aged 11.18 years (SD = 1.06, range = 9–13), participated in a longitudinal study and completed measures three times at 6-month intervals. Findings revealed that music TV was associated with increases in views of men as sexually dominant. Tween TV was associated with increases in views of women as sex objects, which in turn was associated with increased objectification of women’s bodies among adolescents who experienced high levels of gender-typical socialization from their parents. These findings suggest that media exposure among early adolescent boys may contribute to the development of sexually objectifying attitudes toward women. In addition, they highlight the critical role of parents in modulating the effect of media exposure and suggest the usefulness of engaging parents in interventions aiming to decrease these deleterious effects.
KeywordsTelevision Parental gender-role socialization Gender stereotypes Sexual objectification Early adolescent boys
The present research was funded by a grant (G050513 N) from the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) granted to the first author.
This study was funded by a grant from the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) granted to the last author.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Uniqueness of Publication
The manuscript has not been submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration. The manuscript was submitted to the International Communication Association conference. If the manuscript is accepted, the findings will be presented at the ICA conference, but the manuscript will not be published in the conference’s proceedings.
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. This study involved human participants, and procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Active informed consent was obtained from all participants. Authorship and ordering: All authors agree to the authorship order and manuscript content.
- Arndorfer, C. L., & Stormshak, E. A. (2008). Same-sex versus other-sex best friendship in early adolescence: Longitudinal predictors of antisocial behavior throughout adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 1059–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9311-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 121–154). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Bond, B. J., & Drogos, K. L. (2014). Sex on the shore: Wishful identification and parasocial relationships as mediators in the relationship between Jersey Shore exposure and emerging adults' sexual attitudes and behaviors. Media Psychology, 17, 102–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2013.872039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Collins, W. A., Welsh, D. P., & Furman, W. (2009). Adolescent romantic relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 631–652. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163459.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T.-A. (1997). Objectification theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1980). The mainstreaming of America: Violence profile no. 11. Journal of Communication, 30, 10–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1980.tb01987.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gondoli, D. M., Corning, A. F., Blodgett Salafia, E. H., Bucchianeri, M. M., & Fitzsimmons, E. E. (2011). Heterosocial involvement, peer pressure for thinness, and body dissatisfaction among young adolescent girls. Body Image, 8, 143–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2010.12.005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
- Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53–60. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254742561_Structural_Equation_Modeling_Guidelines_for_Determining_Model_Fit.Google Scholar
- Kågesten, A., Gibbs, S., Blum, R. W., Moreau, C., Chandra-Mouli, V., Herbert, A., & Amin, A. (2016). Understanding factors that shape gender attitudes in early adolescence globally: A mixed-methods systematic review. PLoS One, 11, e0157805. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157805.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- McDonald, D. G. (2009). Media use and the social environment. In R. L. Nabi & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media processes and effects (pp. 251–268). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
- Noll, S. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00181.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Parkes, A., Wight, D., Hunt, K., Henderson, M., & Sargent, J. (2013). Are sexual media exposure, parental restrictions on media use and co-viewing TV and DVDs with parents and friends associated with teenagers' early sexual behaviour? Journal of Adolescence, 36, 1121–1133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.08.019.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Reinecke, L., & Oliver, M. B. (2017). Media use and well-being. Status quo and open questions. In L. Reinecke & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of media use and well-being. International perspectives on theory and research on positive media effects (pp. 3–13). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Rideout, V. (2007). Parents, children & media: A Kaiser Family Foundation survey. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED542901.
- Rideout, V. (2015). The common sense census: Media use by tweens and teens. Retrieved from https://www.commonsensemedia.org/research/the-common-sense-census-mediause-by-tweens-and-teens.
- Rousseau, A., Eggermont, S., Bels, A., & Van den Bulck, H. (2018). Separating the sex from the object: Conceptualizing sexualization and (sexual) objectification in Flemish preteens’ popular television programs. Journal of Children and Media, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2018.1425888.
- Shen, F. (2004). Chronic accessibility and individual cognitions: Examining the effects of message frames in political advertisements. Journal of Communication, 54, 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02617.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Snell Jr., W. E. (1998). The stereotypes about male sexuality scale. In C. M. Davis, W. L. Yarber, R. Baurerman, G. Schreer, & S. L. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures: A compendium (2nd ed., pp. 463–465). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Toomey, R. B., Card, N. A., & Casper, D. M. (2014). Peers’ perceptions of gender nonconformity: Associations with overt and relational peer victimization and aggression in early adolescence. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 34, 463–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431613495446.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Valkenburg, P. M., & Cantor, J. (2000). Children’s likes and dislikes of entertainment programs. In D. Zillmann & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Media entertainment: The psychology of its appeal (pp. 135–152). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Widman, L., Choukas-Bradley, S., Helms, S. W., Golin, C. E., & Prinstein, M. J. (2014). Sexual communication between early adolescents and their dating partners, parents, and best friends. The Journal of Sex Research, 51, 731–741. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.843148.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar